Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and Osseointegration
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the surface roughness and design features of titanium dental implants on primary stability and osseointegration. Methods: Sixty titanium dental implants were categorized into three groups based on their surface roughness: smooth (Subgroup A1), mo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1030_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850098646112010240 |
|---|---|
| author | Ravindranath Dhulipalla Ramanarayana Boyapati Kishore K. Katuri Yamuna Marella Chaitanya Adurty Lakshmikanth Kolaparthy |
| author_facet | Ravindranath Dhulipalla Ramanarayana Boyapati Kishore K. Katuri Yamuna Marella Chaitanya Adurty Lakshmikanth Kolaparthy |
| author_sort | Ravindranath Dhulipalla |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the surface roughness and design features of titanium dental implants on primary stability and osseointegration.
Methods:
Sixty titanium dental implants were categorized into three groups based on their surface roughness: smooth (Subgroup A1), moderately rough (Subgroup A2), and highly rough (Subgroup A3). Each roughness category was further divided into three design subgroups: cylindrical (B1), tapered (B2), and hybrid (B3). Primary stability was assessed using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Osseointegration was evaluated through histological and histomorphometric analyses, measuring bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation in rabbit models.
Results:
Highly rough-surface implants (Subgroup A3) demonstrated significantly higher insertion torque and ISQ values than smooth (Subgroup A1) and moderately rough (Subgroup A2) implants (P < 0.001). Among the design features, tapered implants (Subgroup B2) exhibited the highest insertion torque and ISQ values (P < 0.001). Histological and histomorphometric analyses revealed that highly rough-surface implants (Subgroup A3) and tapered implants (Subgroup B2) had the highest BIC and BAFO percentages at all time points (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
These findings indicate that both surface roughness and implant design significantly influence primary stability and osseointegration. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8a0784f0502745e998ebe3af0456e2d1 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-8a0784f0502745e998ebe3af0456e2d12025-08-20T02:40:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3571S357310.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1030_24Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and OsseointegrationRavindranath DhulipallaRamanarayana BoyapatiKishore K. KaturiYamuna MarellaChaitanya AdurtyLakshmikanth KolaparthyObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the surface roughness and design features of titanium dental implants on primary stability and osseointegration. Methods: Sixty titanium dental implants were categorized into three groups based on their surface roughness: smooth (Subgroup A1), moderately rough (Subgroup A2), and highly rough (Subgroup A3). Each roughness category was further divided into three design subgroups: cylindrical (B1), tapered (B2), and hybrid (B3). Primary stability was assessed using insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Osseointegration was evaluated through histological and histomorphometric analyses, measuring bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO) at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation in rabbit models. Results: Highly rough-surface implants (Subgroup A3) demonstrated significantly higher insertion torque and ISQ values than smooth (Subgroup A1) and moderately rough (Subgroup A2) implants (P < 0.001). Among the design features, tapered implants (Subgroup B2) exhibited the highest insertion torque and ISQ values (P < 0.001). Histological and histomorphometric analyses revealed that highly rough-surface implants (Subgroup A3) and tapered implants (Subgroup B2) had the highest BIC and BAFO percentages at all time points (P < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings indicate that both surface roughness and implant design significantly influence primary stability and osseointegration.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1030_24implant designosseointegrationprimary stabilitysurface roughnesstitanium dental implants |
| spellingShingle | Ravindranath Dhulipalla Ramanarayana Boyapati Kishore K. Katuri Yamuna Marella Chaitanya Adurty Lakshmikanth Kolaparthy Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and Osseointegration Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences implant design osseointegration primary stability surface roughness titanium dental implants |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and Osseointegration |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and Osseointegration |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and Osseointegration |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and Osseointegration |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness and Design Features of Titanium Dental Implants on Primary Stability and Osseointegration |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of surface roughness and design features of titanium dental implants on primary stability and osseointegration |
| topic | implant design osseointegration primary stability surface roughness titanium dental implants |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1030_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ravindranathdhulipalla comparativeanalysisofsurfaceroughnessanddesignfeaturesoftitaniumdentalimplantsonprimarystabilityandosseointegration AT ramanarayanaboyapati comparativeanalysisofsurfaceroughnessanddesignfeaturesoftitaniumdentalimplantsonprimarystabilityandosseointegration AT kishorekkaturi comparativeanalysisofsurfaceroughnessanddesignfeaturesoftitaniumdentalimplantsonprimarystabilityandosseointegration AT yamunamarella comparativeanalysisofsurfaceroughnessanddesignfeaturesoftitaniumdentalimplantsonprimarystabilityandosseointegration AT chaitanyaadurty comparativeanalysisofsurfaceroughnessanddesignfeaturesoftitaniumdentalimplantsonprimarystabilityandosseointegration AT lakshmikanthkolaparthy comparativeanalysisofsurfaceroughnessanddesignfeaturesoftitaniumdentalimplantsonprimarystabilityandosseointegration |