Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke

Several neuroimaging methods have been proposed to assess the integrity of the corticospinal tract (CST) for predicting recovery of motor function after stroke, including conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). In this study, we aimed to compare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingyan Tao, Zhaoqing Li, Yang Liu, Jianhua Li, Ruiliang Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4203698
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554967355883520
author Jingyan Tao
Zhaoqing Li
Yang Liu
Jianhua Li
Ruiliang Bai
author_facet Jingyan Tao
Zhaoqing Li
Yang Liu
Jianhua Li
Ruiliang Bai
author_sort Jingyan Tao
collection DOAJ
description Several neuroimaging methods have been proposed to assess the integrity of the corticospinal tract (CST) for predicting recovery of motor function after stroke, including conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). In this study, we aimed to compare the predicative performance of these methods using different neuroimaging modalities and optimize the prediction protocol for upper limb motor function after stroke in a clinical environment. We assessed 28 first-ever stroke patients with upper limb motor impairment. We used the upper extremity module of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (UE-FM) within 1 month of onset (baseline) and again 3 months poststroke. sMRI (T1- and T2-based) was used to measure CST-weighted lesion load (CST-wLL), and DTI was used to measure the fractional anisotropy asymmetry index (FAAI) and the ratio of fractional anisotropy (rFA). The CST-wLL within 1 month poststroke was closely correlated with upper limb motor outcomes and recovery potential. CST‐wLL≥2.068 cc indicated serious CST damage and a poor outcome (100%). CST‐wLL<1.799 cc was correlated with a considerable rate (>70%) of upper limb motor function recovery. CST-wLL showed a comparable area under the curve (AUC) to that of the CST-FAAI (p=0.71). Inclusion of extra-CST-FAAI did not significantly increase the AUC (p=0.58). Our findings suggest that sMRI-derived CST-wLL is a precise predictor of upper limb motor outcomes 3 months poststroke. We recommend this parameter as a predictive imaging biomarker for classifying patients’ recovery prognosis in clinical practice. Conversely, including DTI appeared to induce no significant benefits.
format Article
id doaj-art-89ffa97d2cb849209b4f9a0d33376893
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-5443
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neural Plasticity
spelling doaj-art-89ffa97d2cb849209b4f9a0d333768932025-02-03T05:50:00ZengWileyNeural Plasticity1687-54432022-01-01202210.1155/2022/4203698Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after StrokeJingyan Tao0Zhaoqing Li1Yang Liu2Jianhua Li3Ruiliang Bai4Department of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and Interdisciplinary Institute of Neuroscience and TechnologyDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and Interdisciplinary Institute of Neuroscience and TechnologySeveral neuroimaging methods have been proposed to assess the integrity of the corticospinal tract (CST) for predicting recovery of motor function after stroke, including conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). In this study, we aimed to compare the predicative performance of these methods using different neuroimaging modalities and optimize the prediction protocol for upper limb motor function after stroke in a clinical environment. We assessed 28 first-ever stroke patients with upper limb motor impairment. We used the upper extremity module of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (UE-FM) within 1 month of onset (baseline) and again 3 months poststroke. sMRI (T1- and T2-based) was used to measure CST-weighted lesion load (CST-wLL), and DTI was used to measure the fractional anisotropy asymmetry index (FAAI) and the ratio of fractional anisotropy (rFA). The CST-wLL within 1 month poststroke was closely correlated with upper limb motor outcomes and recovery potential. CST‐wLL≥2.068 cc indicated serious CST damage and a poor outcome (100%). CST‐wLL<1.799 cc was correlated with a considerable rate (>70%) of upper limb motor function recovery. CST-wLL showed a comparable area under the curve (AUC) to that of the CST-FAAI (p=0.71). Inclusion of extra-CST-FAAI did not significantly increase the AUC (p=0.58). Our findings suggest that sMRI-derived CST-wLL is a precise predictor of upper limb motor outcomes 3 months poststroke. We recommend this parameter as a predictive imaging biomarker for classifying patients’ recovery prognosis in clinical practice. Conversely, including DTI appeared to induce no significant benefits.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4203698
spellingShingle Jingyan Tao
Zhaoqing Li
Yang Liu
Jianhua Li
Ruiliang Bai
Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke
Neural Plasticity
title Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke
title_full Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke
title_short Performance Comparison of Different Neuroimaging Methods for Predicting Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke
title_sort performance comparison of different neuroimaging methods for predicting upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4203698
work_keys_str_mv AT jingyantao performancecomparisonofdifferentneuroimagingmethodsforpredictingupperlimbmotoroutcomesinpatientsafterstroke
AT zhaoqingli performancecomparisonofdifferentneuroimagingmethodsforpredictingupperlimbmotoroutcomesinpatientsafterstroke
AT yangliu performancecomparisonofdifferentneuroimagingmethodsforpredictingupperlimbmotoroutcomesinpatientsafterstroke
AT jianhuali performancecomparisonofdifferentneuroimagingmethodsforpredictingupperlimbmotoroutcomesinpatientsafterstroke
AT ruiliangbai performancecomparisonofdifferentneuroimagingmethodsforpredictingupperlimbmotoroutcomesinpatientsafterstroke