A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring

Optimal sensor placement (OSP) is an important task during the implementation of sophisticated structural health monitoring (SHM) systems for large-scale structures. In this paper, a comparative study between the genetic algorithm (GA) and the firefly algorithm (FA) in solving the OSP problem is con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guang-Dong Zhou, Ting-Hua Yi, Huan Zhang, Hong-Nan Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/518692
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563369225224192
author Guang-Dong Zhou
Ting-Hua Yi
Huan Zhang
Hong-Nan Li
author_facet Guang-Dong Zhou
Ting-Hua Yi
Huan Zhang
Hong-Nan Li
author_sort Guang-Dong Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Optimal sensor placement (OSP) is an important task during the implementation of sophisticated structural health monitoring (SHM) systems for large-scale structures. In this paper, a comparative study between the genetic algorithm (GA) and the firefly algorithm (FA) in solving the OSP problem is conducted. To overcome the drawback related to the inapplicability of the FA in optimization problems with discrete variables, some improvements are proposed, including the one-dimensional binary coding system, the Hamming distance between any two fireflies, and the semioriented movement scheme; also, a simple discrete firefly algorithm (SDFA) is developed. The capabilities of the SDFA and the GA in finding the optimal sensor locations are evaluated using two disparate objective functions in a numerical example with a long-span benchmark cable-stayed bridge. The results show that the developed SDFA can find the optimal sensor configuration with high reliability. The comparative study indicates that the SDFA outperforms the GA in terms of algorithm complexity, computational efficiency, and result quality. The optimization mechanism of the FA has the potential to be extended to a wide range of optimization problems.
format Article
id doaj-art-8990ed81bcb74fb483c82df6f9383946
institution Kabale University
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Shock and Vibration
spelling doaj-art-8990ed81bcb74fb483c82df6f93839462025-02-03T01:20:23ZengWileyShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92032015-01-01201510.1155/2015/518692518692A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health MonitoringGuang-Dong Zhou0Ting-Hua Yi1Huan Zhang2Hong-Nan Li3College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, ChinaCollege of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, ChinaOptimal sensor placement (OSP) is an important task during the implementation of sophisticated structural health monitoring (SHM) systems for large-scale structures. In this paper, a comparative study between the genetic algorithm (GA) and the firefly algorithm (FA) in solving the OSP problem is conducted. To overcome the drawback related to the inapplicability of the FA in optimization problems with discrete variables, some improvements are proposed, including the one-dimensional binary coding system, the Hamming distance between any two fireflies, and the semioriented movement scheme; also, a simple discrete firefly algorithm (SDFA) is developed. The capabilities of the SDFA and the GA in finding the optimal sensor locations are evaluated using two disparate objective functions in a numerical example with a long-span benchmark cable-stayed bridge. The results show that the developed SDFA can find the optimal sensor configuration with high reliability. The comparative study indicates that the SDFA outperforms the GA in terms of algorithm complexity, computational efficiency, and result quality. The optimization mechanism of the FA has the potential to be extended to a wide range of optimization problems.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/518692
spellingShingle Guang-Dong Zhou
Ting-Hua Yi
Huan Zhang
Hong-Nan Li
A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring
Shock and Vibration
title A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring
title_full A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring
title_short A Comparative Study of Genetic and Firefly Algorithms for Sensor Placement in Structural Health Monitoring
title_sort comparative study of genetic and firefly algorithms for sensor placement in structural health monitoring
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/518692
work_keys_str_mv AT guangdongzhou acomparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring
AT tinghuayi acomparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring
AT huanzhang acomparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring
AT hongnanli acomparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring
AT guangdongzhou comparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring
AT tinghuayi comparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring
AT huanzhang comparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring
AT hongnanli comparativestudyofgeneticandfireflyalgorithmsforsensorplacementinstructuralhealthmonitoring