De quelques trahisons involontaires du passé. Fonctionnement et interprétation du lapsus
This paper deals with how a Freudian lapsus could be integrated in a historical approach concerned about the analysis of written pieces. It does not aim at delivering a psychoanalysis of writers or at tracking down repression or unconscious in writings. It rather investigates how a lapsus may allow...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Groupe de Recherches Interdisciplinaires sur l'Histoire du Littéraire
2015-02-01
|
| Series: | Les Dossiers du GRIHL |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/6222 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper deals with how a Freudian lapsus could be integrated in a historical approach concerned about the analysis of written pieces. It does not aim at delivering a psychoanalysis of writers or at tracking down repression or unconscious in writings. It rather investigates how a lapsus may allow to approach the functioning of Christian scribal tradition.This paper is based on two articles: the first one by Carlo Ginzburg about a lapsus made by Pope Wojtila when he made his famous pilgrimage to the Great Synagogue of Rome in 1986; the second one by Jacques Le Brun about a Fenelon's handwritten erasure at the time of the pure love controversy. Both texts have nothing in common neither the period nor their content. However they both focuse on lapsus, thematize, theorize and discuss how it works to approach unwitting writings which, using the negative way, put the past back into the present and turn the written form into a relation to time and History. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1958-9247 |