Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists

Contrary to the tradition of some scholars such as Forouzanfar, Homaee, Zarrinkoub who mainly discussed life and thought of the author / poet, some of the works by Dr. Shafiee Kadkani are specific and different because they have emphasized the question of form and the form of literary work apart fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Issa Amankhani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) 2018-04-01
Series:پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3098_070fd8015f37b8f9955fb60da6a4c6c4.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543846994903040
author Issa Amankhani
author_facet Issa Amankhani
author_sort Issa Amankhani
collection DOAJ
description Contrary to the tradition of some scholars such as Forouzanfar, Homaee, Zarrinkoub who mainly discussed life and thought of the author / poet, some of the works by Dr. Shafiee Kadkani are specific and different because they have emphasized the question of form and the form of literary work apart from the content and theme, and they have sometimes written books (poetry, music) or perfectly have crafted oriented articles (based on formalist). Resurrection of Words:  A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists has been the most formalist work by him which is discussed in the introduction of the formalism (history, teachings and characters affected), and some of his articles have been included which have been written with inspiration from their ideas. With all the advantages that this book has (such as all works by Dr. Shafiee Kadkani), there are some criticisms leveled against it. The main criticisms are as follows: 1- incomplete expression (and possibly incorrect) background / context of the emergence of Russian Formalism, 2- lack of coherence of theories presented by the author, 3- some irrefutable and non-scientific propositions in the book and 4-, the inclusion of chapters such as "potter motif evolution in the poetry of Omar Khayyam" which is not consistent with formalism space of the book of resurrection of words.
format Article
id doaj-art-897126e75a944e4f9a2f79f71acb485b
institution Kabale University
issn 2383-1650
language fas
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
record_format Article
series پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
spelling doaj-art-897126e75a944e4f9a2f79f71acb485b2025-01-13T05:31:20ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی2383-16502018-04-0118247673098Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian FormalistsIssa Amankhani0Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Golestan UniversityContrary to the tradition of some scholars such as Forouzanfar, Homaee, Zarrinkoub who mainly discussed life and thought of the author / poet, some of the works by Dr. Shafiee Kadkani are specific and different because they have emphasized the question of form and the form of literary work apart from the content and theme, and they have sometimes written books (poetry, music) or perfectly have crafted oriented articles (based on formalist). Resurrection of Words:  A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists has been the most formalist work by him which is discussed in the introduction of the formalism (history, teachings and characters affected), and some of his articles have been included which have been written with inspiration from their ideas. With all the advantages that this book has (such as all works by Dr. Shafiee Kadkani), there are some criticisms leveled against it. The main criticisms are as follows: 1- incomplete expression (and possibly incorrect) background / context of the emergence of Russian Formalism, 2- lack of coherence of theories presented by the author, 3- some irrefutable and non-scientific propositions in the book and 4-, the inclusion of chapters such as "potter motif evolution in the poetry of Omar Khayyam" which is not consistent with formalism space of the book of resurrection of words.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3098_070fd8015f37b8f9955fb60da6a4c6c4.pdfresurrection wordsshafiee kadkaniformalismformrussian formalists
spellingShingle Issa Amankhani
Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists
پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی
resurrection words
shafiee kadkani
formalism
form
russian formalists
title Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists
title_full Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists
title_fullStr Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists
title_full_unstemmed Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists
title_short Resurrection of Words: A Work in Defending Formalism A Critique on Resurrection of Words A Lesson of Speeches on Literary Theory of Russian Formalists
title_sort resurrection of words a work in defending formalism a critique on resurrection of words a lesson of speeches on literary theory of russian formalists
topic resurrection words
shafiee kadkani
formalism
form
russian formalists
url https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_3098_070fd8015f37b8f9955fb60da6a4c6c4.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT issaamankhani resurrectionofwordsaworkindefendingformalismacritiqueonresurrectionofwordsalessonofspeechesonliterarytheoryofrussianformalists