Testing for reviewer anchoring in peer review: A randomized controlled trial.
<h4>Objective</h4>Peer review frequently follows a process where reviewers first provide initial reviews, authors respond to these reviews, then reviewers update their reviews based on the authors' response. There is mixed evidence regarding whether this process is useful, including...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Ryan Liu, Steven Jecmen, Vincent Conitzer, Fei Fang, Nihar B Shah |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301111 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Peer reviews of peer reviews: A randomized controlled trial and other experiments.
by: Alexander Goldberg, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
A large scale randomized controlled trial on herding in peer-review discussions.
by: Ivan Stelmakh, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
A randomized controlled trial on anonymizing reviewers to each other in peer review discussions.
by: Charvi Rastogi, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization for pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial of coil and anchored needle localization
by: Ya-Nan Lv, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Testing the Reliability of Anchoring Susceptibility Scores
by: Lucia Weber, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)