The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

The present work was conducted to evaluate AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) and SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) marker systems for their ability to detect genetic diversity within a set of 29 common bean accessions spanning both the Andean and Mesoamerican gene pools and to compare the eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marko MARAS, Jelka ŠUŠTAR-VOZLIČ, Branka JAVORNIK, Vladimir MEGLIČ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2008-05-01
Series:Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/aas/article/view/15170
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849772074305847296
author Marko MARAS
Jelka ŠUŠTAR-VOZLIČ
Branka JAVORNIK
Vladimir MEGLIČ
author_facet Marko MARAS
Jelka ŠUŠTAR-VOZLIČ
Branka JAVORNIK
Vladimir MEGLIČ
author_sort Marko MARAS
collection DOAJ
description The present work was conducted to evaluate AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) and SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) marker systems for their ability to detect genetic diversity within a set of 29 common bean accessions spanning both the Andean and Mesoamerican gene pools and to compare the efficiency of these two marker types in the classification of accessions according to the gene pools of origin. The ten AFLP primer combinations produced 112 polymorphic bands, while 14 SSR primer pairs generated 100 polymorphic bands. Almost two-fold higher value of expected heterozygosity was calculated for SSR (0.63) than for AFLP (0.32). As the result of a higher multiplex ratio component (11.20), higher marker index value was observed for AFLP (3.56) in comparison to SSR (0.63). The higher level of polymorphism detected by SSR markers has contributed to the lower genetic similarity estimates based on SSR markers (mean 0.25) as compared to AFLP markers (mean 0.88). The dendrograms generated with hierarchical UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean) cluster analysis of the Jaccard's similarity coefficient matrices revealed two major clusters, which were identified as the Andean and the Mesoamerican gene pools. Both marker systems showed comparable accuracy in grouping genotypes of common bean according to their gene pool of origin.
format Article
id doaj-art-8900d33f56ca48429886720f2bb5bb1e
institution DOAJ
issn 1854-1941
language English
publishDate 2008-05-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
spelling doaj-art-8900d33f56ca48429886720f2bb5bb1e2025-08-20T03:02:26ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Acta Agriculturae Slovenica1854-19412008-05-01911879610.14720/aas.2008.91.1.1517021563The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Marko MARAS0Jelka ŠUŠTAR-VOZLIČ1Branka JAVORNIK2Vladimir MEGLIČ3Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Hacquetova 17, SloveniaAgricultural Institute of Slovenia, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Hacquetova 17, SloveniaBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SloveniaAgricultural Institute of Slovenia, SI- 1000 Ljubljana, Hacquetova 17, SloveniaThe present work was conducted to evaluate AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) and SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) marker systems for their ability to detect genetic diversity within a set of 29 common bean accessions spanning both the Andean and Mesoamerican gene pools and to compare the efficiency of these two marker types in the classification of accessions according to the gene pools of origin. The ten AFLP primer combinations produced 112 polymorphic bands, while 14 SSR primer pairs generated 100 polymorphic bands. Almost two-fold higher value of expected heterozygosity was calculated for SSR (0.63) than for AFLP (0.32). As the result of a higher multiplex ratio component (11.20), higher marker index value was observed for AFLP (3.56) in comparison to SSR (0.63). The higher level of polymorphism detected by SSR markers has contributed to the lower genetic similarity estimates based on SSR markers (mean 0.25) as compared to AFLP markers (mean 0.88). The dendrograms generated with hierarchical UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean) cluster analysis of the Jaccard's similarity coefficient matrices revealed two major clusters, which were identified as the Andean and the Mesoamerican gene pools. Both marker systems showed comparable accuracy in grouping genotypes of common bean according to their gene pool of origin.https://journals.uni-lj.si/aas/article/view/15170aflpssrgene poolgenetic diversityphaseolus vulgaris
spellingShingle Marko MARAS
Jelka ŠUŠTAR-VOZLIČ
Branka JAVORNIK
Vladimir MEGLIČ
The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Acta Agriculturae Slovenica
aflp
ssr
gene pool
genetic diversity
phaseolus vulgaris
title The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_full The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_fullStr The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_full_unstemmed The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_short The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
title_sort efficiency of aflp and ssr markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean phaseolus vulgaris l
topic aflp
ssr
gene pool
genetic diversity
phaseolus vulgaris
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/aas/article/view/15170
work_keys_str_mv AT markomaras theefficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl
AT jelkasustarvozlic theefficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl
AT brankajavornik theefficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl
AT vladimirmeglic theefficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl
AT markomaras efficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl
AT jelkasustarvozlic efficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl
AT brankajavornik efficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl
AT vladimirmeglic efficiencyofaflpandssrmarkersingeneticdiversityestimationandgenepoolclassificationofcommonbeanphaseolusvulgarisl