Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse Backgrounds

The veracity of qualitative research is typically measured according to well-established principles of trustworthiness. Adhering to these principles demonstrates that findings are the result of a rigorous methodology and that findings accurately describe the experiences of participants. Member check...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriela López-Zerón, M. Isidora Bilbao-Nieva, Kathryn A.V. Clements
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Specialty Publications 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Participatory Research Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.24412
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850219415485808640
author Gabriela López-Zerón
M. Isidora Bilbao-Nieva
Kathryn A.V. Clements
author_facet Gabriela López-Zerón
M. Isidora Bilbao-Nieva
Kathryn A.V. Clements
author_sort Gabriela López-Zerón
collection DOAJ
description The veracity of qualitative research is typically measured according to well-established principles of trustworthiness. Adhering to these principles demonstrates that findings are the result of a rigorous methodology and that findings accurately describe the experiences of participants. Member checking is one strategy often utilized to ensure the credibility of the findings, while also generating a valuable opportunity for research participants to actively participate in the analytic process. However, there is limited guidance as to how to conduct member checks that are culturally and contextually relevant to all research participants, particularly if data has been collected in multiple languages with diverse participants. In these instances, researchers must remain vigilant to avoid excluding the voices of participants or designing member checks that might not be culturally and contextually responsive. This article describes a technique --- utilizing “I-poems” --- as an innovative way to conduct the member checking process with a diverse group of survivors of intimate partner violence who participated in a longitudinal evaluation of the services they received. This inclusive and innovative member checking process was found to be a culturally relevant way to maximize participation, minimize power imbalances, and invite research participants to become active partners in the analytic process.
format Article
id doaj-art-88be402df67b445cafe6bd24268aeb33
institution OA Journals
issn 2688-0261
language English
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Specialty Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Participatory Research Methods
spelling doaj-art-88be402df67b445cafe6bd24268aeb332025-08-20T02:07:23ZengSpecialty PublicationsJournal of Participatory Research Methods2688-02612021-07-012210.35844/001c.24412Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse BackgroundsGabriela López-ZerónM. Isidora Bilbao-NievaKathryn A.V. ClementsThe veracity of qualitative research is typically measured according to well-established principles of trustworthiness. Adhering to these principles demonstrates that findings are the result of a rigorous methodology and that findings accurately describe the experiences of participants. Member checking is one strategy often utilized to ensure the credibility of the findings, while also generating a valuable opportunity for research participants to actively participate in the analytic process. However, there is limited guidance as to how to conduct member checks that are culturally and contextually relevant to all research participants, particularly if data has been collected in multiple languages with diverse participants. In these instances, researchers must remain vigilant to avoid excluding the voices of participants or designing member checks that might not be culturally and contextually responsive. This article describes a technique --- utilizing “I-poems” --- as an innovative way to conduct the member checking process with a diverse group of survivors of intimate partner violence who participated in a longitudinal evaluation of the services they received. This inclusive and innovative member checking process was found to be a culturally relevant way to maximize participation, minimize power imbalances, and invite research participants to become active partners in the analytic process.https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.24412
spellingShingle Gabriela López-Zerón
M. Isidora Bilbao-Nieva
Kathryn A.V. Clements
Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse Backgrounds
Journal of Participatory Research Methods
title Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse Backgrounds
title_full Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse Backgrounds
title_fullStr Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse Backgrounds
title_full_unstemmed Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse Backgrounds
title_short Conducting Member Checks With Multilingual Research Participants From Diverse Backgrounds
title_sort conducting member checks with multilingual research participants from diverse backgrounds
url https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.24412
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielalopezzeron conductingmembercheckswithmultilingualresearchparticipantsfromdiversebackgrounds
AT misidorabilbaonieva conductingmembercheckswithmultilingualresearchparticipantsfromdiversebackgrounds
AT kathrynavclements conductingmembercheckswithmultilingualresearchparticipantsfromdiversebackgrounds