Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography May Carry Similar (but Very Low) Risks of Carcinogenesis
In comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), it is often stated thata significant advantage of MRI is its lack of ionizing radiation, which may contribute to carcinogenesis. This article questions whether this concern is justified. First, the basis for the linear no-th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Yuta Shibamoto |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Dose-Response |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/15593258251356102 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Improved Guided Image Fusion for Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging
by: Amina Jameel, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Imaging of pediatric great vessel stents: Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?
by: A M den Harder, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Evaluating the Efficiency of Work of the Department of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by: K. K. Osadchiy, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Denoising very low-field magnetic resonance images using native noise modeling
by: Tonny Ssentamu, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Current Approaches for Image Fusion of Histological Data with Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by: Philipp Nolte, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)