The prognostic power of major pathological response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: a multi-center cohort study
BackgroundFor esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC), neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) constitutes an innovative therapeutic strategy. However, The relationship between its short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis requires further clarification. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the p...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Immunology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1599526/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | BackgroundFor esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC), neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) constitutes an innovative therapeutic strategy. However, The relationship between its short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis requires further clarification. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of major pathological response (MPR) in ESCC patients receiving nICT.MethodThis is a retrospective multi-center study enrolling 306 ESCC patients undergoing nICT. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and recurrence patterns. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to address heterogeneity between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were utilized to analyze survival difference.Results144 achieved a MPR, while 68 achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Cox regression analysis identified MPR as an independent prognostic factor [HR = 0.48, 95%CI= (0.28 - 0.82), P = 0.007]. Survival analysis demonstrated that MPR patients experienced significantly improved RFS compared to non-MPR patients, before (P<0.001) and after PSM (P = 0.016). Importantly, the RFS of MPR patients was comparable to that of pCR patients (P = 0.319 in the unmatched cohort; P = 0.456 in the matched cohort). Furthermore, adjuvant therapy did not provide additional recurrence-free benefits for MPR patients. Compared to pCR patients, MPR patients exhibited a similar recurrence rate, with similar recurrence sites.ConclusionMPR represents a significant prognostic indicator in ESCC patients undergoing nICT, demonstrating prognostic outcomes comparable to those of pCR. These findings indicated that MPR could function as a surrogate endpoint for pCR, potentially influencing treatment strategies by refining follow-up protocol and the implementation of adjuvant therapy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1664-3224 |