The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundOsteoporosis is a global bone disease, and drug therapy carries the risk of side effects, requiring exploration of safe and effective alternative therapies. Virtual reality (VR) has shown potential in rehabilitation medicine, but its efficacy in the management of osteoporosis and osteopeni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shunxia He, Shiqiu Dong, Xiaoguang Lin, Zhijie Wang, Yuzi Diao, Xiao Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1612882/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849428503118741504
author Shunxia He
Shiqiu Dong
Shiqiu Dong
Xiaoguang Lin
Zhijie Wang
Yuzi Diao
Xiao Gao
Xiao Gao
author_facet Shunxia He
Shiqiu Dong
Shiqiu Dong
Xiaoguang Lin
Zhijie Wang
Yuzi Diao
Xiao Gao
Xiao Gao
author_sort Shunxia He
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundOsteoporosis is a global bone disease, and drug therapy carries the risk of side effects, requiring exploration of safe and effective alternative therapies. Virtual reality (VR) has shown potential in rehabilitation medicine, but its efficacy in the management of osteoporosis and osteopenia has not been systematically evaluated.MethodUsing PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, we conducted a comprehensive database search to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of VR on osteoporosis and bone loss. Trials published up to 30 March 2025 met our predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We extracted data, reviewed the literature. We assessed the methodological quality of the included trials and the certainty of the pooled evidence. Meta-analyses were performed using StataSE version 16.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 216 patients from 5 RCTs. All cases included in our study adopted the non-immersive VR intervention approach. Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35–1.19, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%), balance (SMD = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.10–4.05, P = 0.001, I2 = 91.2%) and mobility (SMD = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.14–3.13, P = 0.032, I2 = 93.7%) were improved compared to the control group. However, lumbar BMD (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: −0.02, 0.80, P = 0.062, I2 = 0%) and quality of life (QOL) (SMD = 2.50, 95% CI: −2.15, 7.16, P = 0.292, I2 = 97.4%) were not significantly improved compared to the control group. None of the included studies reported adverse events or safety data.ConclusionThis systematic evaluation provides valuable evidence for the management of osteoporosis and osteopenia through VR. However, given the overall low and very low level of evidence, the results need to be treated with caution. In the future, VR may be a potential treatment for osteoporosis and osteopenia.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251023178, PROSPERO, identifier CRD420251023178.
format Article
id doaj-art-881e9d54f7a84aeca17dd0d2d2059524
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-042X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj-art-881e9d54f7a84aeca17dd0d2d20595242025-08-20T03:28:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2025-07-011610.3389/fphys.2025.16128821612882The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsShunxia He0Shiqiu Dong1Shiqiu Dong2Xiaoguang Lin3Zhijie Wang4Yuzi Diao5Xiao Gao6Xiao Gao7Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, ChinaHeilongjiang Nursing College, Harbin, ChinaGraduate School, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of KoreaHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, ChinaShanxi Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, ChinaHeilongjiang Vocational College of Winter Sports, Harbin, ChinaHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, ChinaThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, ChinaBackgroundOsteoporosis is a global bone disease, and drug therapy carries the risk of side effects, requiring exploration of safe and effective alternative therapies. Virtual reality (VR) has shown potential in rehabilitation medicine, but its efficacy in the management of osteoporosis and osteopenia has not been systematically evaluated.MethodUsing PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, we conducted a comprehensive database search to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of VR on osteoporosis and bone loss. Trials published up to 30 March 2025 met our predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We extracted data, reviewed the literature. We assessed the methodological quality of the included trials and the certainty of the pooled evidence. Meta-analyses were performed using StataSE version 16.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 216 patients from 5 RCTs. All cases included in our study adopted the non-immersive VR intervention approach. Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35–1.19, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%), balance (SMD = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.10–4.05, P = 0.001, I2 = 91.2%) and mobility (SMD = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.14–3.13, P = 0.032, I2 = 93.7%) were improved compared to the control group. However, lumbar BMD (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: −0.02, 0.80, P = 0.062, I2 = 0%) and quality of life (QOL) (SMD = 2.50, 95% CI: −2.15, 7.16, P = 0.292, I2 = 97.4%) were not significantly improved compared to the control group. None of the included studies reported adverse events or safety data.ConclusionThis systematic evaluation provides valuable evidence for the management of osteoporosis and osteopenia through VR. However, given the overall low and very low level of evidence, the results need to be treated with caution. In the future, VR may be a potential treatment for osteoporosis and osteopenia.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251023178, PROSPERO, identifier CRD420251023178.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1612882/fullosteopeniavirtual realityexerciseagingosteoporosis
spellingShingle Shunxia He
Shiqiu Dong
Shiqiu Dong
Xiaoguang Lin
Zhijie Wang
Yuzi Diao
Xiao Gao
Xiao Gao
The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Frontiers in Physiology
osteopenia
virtual reality
exercise
aging
osteoporosis
title The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness of virtual reality in people with osteoporosis or osteopenia a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic osteopenia
virtual reality
exercise
aging
osteoporosis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2025.1612882/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shunxiahe theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shiqiudong theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shiqiudong theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaoguanglin theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhijiewang theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuzidiao theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaogao theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaogao theeffectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shunxiahe effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shiqiudong effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shiqiudong effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaoguanglin effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhijiewang effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yuzidiao effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaogao effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaogao effectivenessofvirtualrealityinpeoplewithosteoporosisorosteopeniaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials