Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of Turkey

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of different climate and geographic conditions on bone mineral density. Materials and Methods: The patients who had been examined with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for the suspicion of osteoporosis in two different regions of Turkey...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Umut Hatay Gölge, Erkam Kömürcü, Burak Kaymaz, Ferdi Göksel, Yunus Güzel, Gürhan Adam, Pırıl Erbay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Publishing House 2014-08-01
Series:Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.turkosteoporozdergisi.org/article_7255/Comparison-Of-Osteoporosis-In-Two-Different-Regions-Of-Turkey
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849400417258045440
author Umut Hatay Gölge
Erkam Kömürcü
Burak Kaymaz
Ferdi Göksel
Yunus Güzel
Gürhan Adam
Pırıl Erbay
author_facet Umut Hatay Gölge
Erkam Kömürcü
Burak Kaymaz
Ferdi Göksel
Yunus Güzel
Gürhan Adam
Pırıl Erbay
author_sort Umut Hatay Gölge
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of different climate and geographic conditions on bone mineral density. Materials and Methods: The patients who had been examined with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for the suspicion of osteoporosis in two different regions of Turkey were included in the study. Medical records of these 2457 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and osteoporosis etiology of these patients were recorded. Results: Dual X-ray Absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck and lomber vertebras of these patients were investigated. 927 of the patients were found to be osteoporotic and 907 of the patients to be osteopenic. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender and BMI. Lumbar vertebras (L1-4) and femoral neck T scores of the patients with similar age and gender in these 2 different regions were compared and the difference between the groups was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The effect of geography and climate conditions on the bone quality is well known. In this respect regional strategies in the prevention and treatment of the osteoporosis may be judicious. (Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis 2014;20: 56-9)
format Article
id doaj-art-87fd096875f44077b7b7651c327da5b6
institution Kabale University
issn 2147-2653
language English
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher Galenos Publishing House
record_format Article
series Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-87fd096875f44077b7b7651c327da5b62025-08-20T03:38:05ZengGalenos Publishing HouseTürk Osteoporoz Dergisi2147-26532014-08-01202565910.4274/tod.62681Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of TurkeyUmut Hatay Gölge0Erkam Kömürcü1Burak Kaymaz2Ferdi Göksel3Yunus Güzel4Gürhan Adam5Pırıl Erbay6Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, TürkiyeÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, TürkiyeÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, TürkiyeÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, TürkiyeOrdu Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Ordu, TürkiyeÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, TürkiyeÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, TürkiyeObjective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of different climate and geographic conditions on bone mineral density. Materials and Methods: The patients who had been examined with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for the suspicion of osteoporosis in two different regions of Turkey were included in the study. Medical records of these 2457 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and osteoporosis etiology of these patients were recorded. Results: Dual X-ray Absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck and lomber vertebras of these patients were investigated. 927 of the patients were found to be osteoporotic and 907 of the patients to be osteopenic. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender and BMI. Lumbar vertebras (L1-4) and femoral neck T scores of the patients with similar age and gender in these 2 different regions were compared and the difference between the groups was found to be statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The effect of geography and climate conditions on the bone quality is well known. In this respect regional strategies in the prevention and treatment of the osteoporosis may be judicious. (Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis 2014;20: 56-9)http://www.turkosteoporozdergisi.org/article_7255/Comparison-Of-Osteoporosis-In-Two-Different-Regions-Of-TurkeyBone mineral densityosteoporosisT scoreregional differences
spellingShingle Umut Hatay Gölge
Erkam Kömürcü
Burak Kaymaz
Ferdi Göksel
Yunus Güzel
Gürhan Adam
Pırıl Erbay
Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of Turkey
Türk Osteoporoz Dergisi
Bone mineral density
osteoporosis
T score
regional differences
title Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of Turkey
title_full Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of Turkey
title_fullStr Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of Turkey
title_short Comparison of Osteoporosis in Two Different Regions of Turkey
title_sort comparison of osteoporosis in two different regions of turkey
topic Bone mineral density
osteoporosis
T score
regional differences
url http://www.turkosteoporozdergisi.org/article_7255/Comparison-Of-Osteoporosis-In-Two-Different-Regions-Of-Turkey
work_keys_str_mv AT umuthataygolge comparisonofosteoporosisintwodifferentregionsofturkey
AT erkamkomurcu comparisonofosteoporosisintwodifferentregionsofturkey
AT burakkaymaz comparisonofosteoporosisintwodifferentregionsofturkey
AT ferdigoksel comparisonofosteoporosisintwodifferentregionsofturkey
AT yunusguzel comparisonofosteoporosisintwodifferentregionsofturkey
AT gurhanadam comparisonofosteoporosisintwodifferentregionsofturkey
AT pırılerbay comparisonofosteoporosisintwodifferentregionsofturkey