Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing

Abstract Background New sequencing technologies provide options for the scientific community to design studies and build clinical workflows. These options expand user choice, and can enable more accurate, scalable, or affordable workflows depending on the fit between scientist needs and platform cap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Carroll, Alexey Kolesnikov, Daniel E. Cook, Lucas Brambrink, Kelly N. Wiseman, Sophie M. Billings, Semyon Kruglyak, Bryan R. Lajoie, Junhua Zhao, Shawn E. Levy, Cory Y. McLean, Kishwar Shafin, Maria Nattestad, Pi-Chuan Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06191-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849332253379788800
author Andrew Carroll
Alexey Kolesnikov
Daniel E. Cook
Lucas Brambrink
Kelly N. Wiseman
Sophie M. Billings
Semyon Kruglyak
Bryan R. Lajoie
Junhua Zhao
Shawn E. Levy
Cory Y. McLean
Kishwar Shafin
Maria Nattestad
Pi-Chuan Chang
author_facet Andrew Carroll
Alexey Kolesnikov
Daniel E. Cook
Lucas Brambrink
Kelly N. Wiseman
Sophie M. Billings
Semyon Kruglyak
Bryan R. Lajoie
Junhua Zhao
Shawn E. Levy
Cory Y. McLean
Kishwar Shafin
Maria Nattestad
Pi-Chuan Chang
author_sort Andrew Carroll
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background New sequencing technologies provide options for the scientific community to design studies and build clinical workflows. These options expand user choice, and can enable more accurate, scalable, or affordable workflows depending on the fit between scientist needs and platform capability. However, it is essential to understand the performance of these new technologies for different tasks, especially for capabilities that were not possible or tractable in prior technologies. We investigate the new sequencing technology avidity from Element Biosciences. to help the scientific community understand the performance of the options to generate sequencing data. Results We show that Element whole genome sequencing achieves higher mapping and variant calling accuracy compared to Illumina sequencing at the same coverage, with larger differences at lower coverages (20–30x). We quantify base error rates of Element reads, finding lower error rates, especially in homopolymer and tandem repeat regions. We use Element’s ability to generate paired end sequencing with longer insert sizes than typical short–read sequencing. We show that longer insert sizes result in even higher accuracy, with long insert Element sequencing giving more accurate genome analyses at all coverages. Conclusions New options for sequencing technologies can analyze genomes comparably or better than prior standard methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-87ef3a54d4034b79b7acca0640d7f450
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2105
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Bioinformatics
spelling doaj-art-87ef3a54d4034b79b7acca0640d7f4502025-08-20T03:46:15ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052025-07-0126111210.1186/s12859-025-06191-4Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencingAndrew Carroll0Alexey Kolesnikov1Daniel E. Cook2Lucas Brambrink3Kelly N. Wiseman4Sophie M. Billings5Semyon Kruglyak6Bryan R. Lajoie7Junhua Zhao8Shawn E. Levy9Cory Y. McLean10Kishwar Shafin11Maria Nattestad12Pi-Chuan Chang13Google LLCGoogle LLCGoogle LLCGoogle LLCElement BiosciencesElement BiosciencesElement BiosciencesElement BiosciencesElement BiosciencesElement BiosciencesGoogle LLCGoogle LLCGoogle LLCGoogle LLCAbstract Background New sequencing technologies provide options for the scientific community to design studies and build clinical workflows. These options expand user choice, and can enable more accurate, scalable, or affordable workflows depending on the fit between scientist needs and platform capability. However, it is essential to understand the performance of these new technologies for different tasks, especially for capabilities that were not possible or tractable in prior technologies. We investigate the new sequencing technology avidity from Element Biosciences. to help the scientific community understand the performance of the options to generate sequencing data. Results We show that Element whole genome sequencing achieves higher mapping and variant calling accuracy compared to Illumina sequencing at the same coverage, with larger differences at lower coverages (20–30x). We quantify base error rates of Element reads, finding lower error rates, especially in homopolymer and tandem repeat regions. We use Element’s ability to generate paired end sequencing with longer insert sizes than typical short–read sequencing. We show that longer insert sizes result in even higher accuracy, with long insert Element sequencing giving more accurate genome analyses at all coverages. Conclusions New options for sequencing technologies can analyze genomes comparably or better than prior standard methods.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06191-4GenomicsSequencingBioinformaticsWGSVariant calling
spellingShingle Andrew Carroll
Alexey Kolesnikov
Daniel E. Cook
Lucas Brambrink
Kelly N. Wiseman
Sophie M. Billings
Semyon Kruglyak
Bryan R. Lajoie
Junhua Zhao
Shawn E. Levy
Cory Y. McLean
Kishwar Shafin
Maria Nattestad
Pi-Chuan Chang
Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing
BMC Bioinformatics
Genomics
Sequencing
Bioinformatics
WGS
Variant calling
title Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing
title_full Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing
title_fullStr Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing
title_short Accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing
title_sort accurate human genome analysis with element avidity sequencing
topic Genomics
Sequencing
Bioinformatics
WGS
Variant calling
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06191-4
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewcarroll accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT alexeykolesnikov accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT danielecook accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT lucasbrambrink accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT kellynwiseman accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT sophiembillings accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT semyonkruglyak accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT bryanrlajoie accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT junhuazhao accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT shawnelevy accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT coryymclean accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT kishwarshafin accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT marianattestad accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing
AT pichuanchang accuratehumangenomeanalysiswithelementaviditysequencing