East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East London

Background Sex workers’ risk of violence and ill-health is shaped by their work environments, community and structural factors, including criminalisation. Aim We evaluated the impact of removing police enforcement on sex workers’ safety, health and access to services. Design Mixed-methods participat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pippa Grenfell, Jocelyn Elmes, Rachel Stuart, Janet Eastham, Josephine Walker, Chrissy Browne, Carolyn Henham, M Paz Hernandez Blanco, Kathleen Hill, Sibongile Rutsito, Maggie O’Neill, MD Sarker, Sarah Creighton, Peter Vickerman, Marie-Claude Boily, Lucy Platt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NIHR Journals Library 2024-09-01
Series:Public Health Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3310/GFVC7006
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846111700043956224
author Pippa Grenfell
Jocelyn Elmes
Rachel Stuart
Janet Eastham
Josephine Walker
Chrissy Browne
Carolyn Henham
M Paz Hernandez Blanco
Kathleen Hill
Sibongile Rutsito
Maggie O’Neill
MD Sarker
Sarah Creighton
Peter Vickerman
Marie-Claude Boily
Lucy Platt
author_facet Pippa Grenfell
Jocelyn Elmes
Rachel Stuart
Janet Eastham
Josephine Walker
Chrissy Browne
Carolyn Henham
M Paz Hernandez Blanco
Kathleen Hill
Sibongile Rutsito
Maggie O’Neill
MD Sarker
Sarah Creighton
Peter Vickerman
Marie-Claude Boily
Lucy Platt
author_sort Pippa Grenfell
collection DOAJ
description Background Sex workers’ risk of violence and ill-health is shaped by their work environments, community and structural factors, including criminalisation. Aim We evaluated the impact of removing police enforcement on sex workers’ safety, health and access to services. Design Mixed-methods participatory study comprising qualitative research, a prospective cohort study, mathematical modelling and routine data collation. Setting Three boroughs in London, UK. Participants People aged ≥ 18 years, who provided in-person sexual services. Interventions Simulated removal of police enforcement. Outcomes Primary – recent or past experience of sexual, physical or emotional violence. Secondary – depression/anxiety symptoms, physical health, chlamydia/gonorrhoea, and service access. Results A combination of enforcement by police, local authorities and immigration, being denied justice when reporting violence, and linked cuts to specialist health and support services created harmful conditions for sex workers. This disproportionately affected cisgender and transgender women who work on the streets, use drugs, are migrants and/or women of colour. Among women (n = 197), street-based sex workers experienced higher levels than indoor sex workers of recent violence from clients (73% vs. 36%), police (42% vs. 7%) and others (67% vs. 17%); homelessness (65% vs. 7%); anxiety and depression (71% vs 35%); physical ill-health (57% vs 31%); and recent law enforcement (87% vs. 9%). For street-based sex workers, recent arrest was associated with violence from others (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)) 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 6.94). Displacement by police was associated with client violence (AOR 4.35; 95% CI 1.36 to 13.90) as were financial difficulties (AOR 4.66; CI 1.64 to 13.24). Among indoor sex workers, unstable residency (AOR 3.19; 95% CI 1.36 to 7.49) and financial difficulties (AOR 3.66; 95% CI 1.64 to 8.18) contributed to risk of client violence. Among all genders (n = 288), ethnically and racially minoritised sex workers (26.4%) reported more police encounters than white sex workers, partly linked to increased representation in street settings (51.4% vs. 30.7%; p = 0.002) but associations remained after adjusting for work setting. Simulated removal of police displacement and homelessness was associated with a 71% reduction in violence (95% credible interval 55% to 83%). Participants called for a redirection of funds from enforcement towards respectful, peer-led services. Limitations Restriction to one urban locality prevents generalisability of findings. More interviews with under-represented participants (e.g. trans/non-binary sex workers) may have yielded further insights into inequities. Correlation between different risk factors restricted outcomes of interest for the modelling analyses, which were largely limited to experience of violence. Conclusion Our research adds to international evidence on the harms of criminalisation and enforcement, particularly for women who work on street and/or are racially or ethnically minoritised. Findings add weight to calls to decriminalise sex work, tackle institutionally racist, misogynist and otherwise discriminatory practices against sex workers in police and other agencies, and to (re)commission experience-based, peer-led services by and for sex workers particularly benefiting the most marginalised communities. Future work Realist informed trials, co-produced with sex workers, would provide rigorous evidence on effective approaches to protect sex workers’ health, safety and rights. Funding This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number 15/55/58. Plain language summary Some sex workers experience greater levels of violence, anxiety, depression and drug use than people who do not sell sex. This research evaluated the effects of removing police enforcement on sex workers’ safety and health (violence, depression and anxiety) and access to health and social care in East London. The study was participatory: co-researchers with lived experience of sex work or of working closely with sex workers worked with university-based researchers to design, conduct and disseminate the research. We conducted qualitative research (interviews and neighbourhood walks) to understand how police enforcement affected sex workers’ safety, health and service access. We measured how much enforcement affected levels of violence, through a cohort study (recruiting participants and following up with them over time). We then developed a mathematical model to simulate the effects of removing enforcement. In this urban locality, we found that women (cisgender and transgender) who worked on the street experienced far higher levels of police enforcement and reported more violence from all perpetrators, including police themselves, than those working indoors. They reported higher levels of anxiety and depression and were less likely to be getting help for these problems. In our study, sex workers’ safety and mental health were affected by entrenched poverty, insecure housing, police enforcement and service cuts. Cisgender and transgender women who worked on the street, used drugs, were migrants and/or were women of colour were particularly targeted for enforcement, denied justice and affected by funding cuts to specialist health and support services. Ethnically and racially minoritised sex workers more frequently worked in lower-paid, street-based settings and, regardless of work setting, were more frequently arrested and imprisoned. Our mathematical modelling suggested that stopping the displacement of street-based sex workers alongside the provision of housing could result in a significant (71%) reduction in client violence. Participants recommended redirecting funds from enforcement towards respectful, peer-led services. Findings add weight to existing international evidence on ending enforcement against sex workers and the need to address other of violence and poor health, including reducing poverty, providing housing and commissioning appropriate, community-led services for sex workers.
format Article
id doaj-art-87e85cde421544c2818b739ae6597b09
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-439X
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher NIHR Journals Library
record_format Article
series Public Health Research
spelling doaj-art-87e85cde421544c2818b739ae6597b092024-12-23T06:53:33ZengNIHR Journals LibraryPublic Health Research2050-439X2024-09-0110.3310/GFVC700615/55/58East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East LondonPippa Grenfell0Jocelyn Elmes1Rachel Stuart2Janet Eastham3Josephine Walker4Chrissy Browne5Carolyn Henham6M Paz Hernandez Blanco7Kathleen Hill8Sibongile Rutsito9Maggie O’Neill10MD Sarker11Sarah Creighton12Peter Vickerman13Marie-Claude Boily14Lucy Platt15Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKBrunel University, London, UKIndependent researcherPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UKFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKOpen Doors, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UKSchool of Health Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKDepartment of Sociology, University College Cork, Cork, IrelandFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKDepartment of Sexual Health, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UKFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKBackground Sex workers’ risk of violence and ill-health is shaped by their work environments, community and structural factors, including criminalisation. Aim We evaluated the impact of removing police enforcement on sex workers’ safety, health and access to services. Design Mixed-methods participatory study comprising qualitative research, a prospective cohort study, mathematical modelling and routine data collation. Setting Three boroughs in London, UK. Participants People aged ≥ 18 years, who provided in-person sexual services. Interventions Simulated removal of police enforcement. Outcomes Primary – recent or past experience of sexual, physical or emotional violence. Secondary – depression/anxiety symptoms, physical health, chlamydia/gonorrhoea, and service access. Results A combination of enforcement by police, local authorities and immigration, being denied justice when reporting violence, and linked cuts to specialist health and support services created harmful conditions for sex workers. This disproportionately affected cisgender and transgender women who work on the streets, use drugs, are migrants and/or women of colour. Among women (n = 197), street-based sex workers experienced higher levels than indoor sex workers of recent violence from clients (73% vs. 36%), police (42% vs. 7%) and others (67% vs. 17%); homelessness (65% vs. 7%); anxiety and depression (71% vs 35%); physical ill-health (57% vs 31%); and recent law enforcement (87% vs. 9%). For street-based sex workers, recent arrest was associated with violence from others (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)) 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11 to 6.94). Displacement by police was associated with client violence (AOR 4.35; 95% CI 1.36 to 13.90) as were financial difficulties (AOR 4.66; CI 1.64 to 13.24). Among indoor sex workers, unstable residency (AOR 3.19; 95% CI 1.36 to 7.49) and financial difficulties (AOR 3.66; 95% CI 1.64 to 8.18) contributed to risk of client violence. Among all genders (n = 288), ethnically and racially minoritised sex workers (26.4%) reported more police encounters than white sex workers, partly linked to increased representation in street settings (51.4% vs. 30.7%; p = 0.002) but associations remained after adjusting for work setting. Simulated removal of police displacement and homelessness was associated with a 71% reduction in violence (95% credible interval 55% to 83%). Participants called for a redirection of funds from enforcement towards respectful, peer-led services. Limitations Restriction to one urban locality prevents generalisability of findings. More interviews with under-represented participants (e.g. trans/non-binary sex workers) may have yielded further insights into inequities. Correlation between different risk factors restricted outcomes of interest for the modelling analyses, which were largely limited to experience of violence. Conclusion Our research adds to international evidence on the harms of criminalisation and enforcement, particularly for women who work on street and/or are racially or ethnically minoritised. Findings add weight to calls to decriminalise sex work, tackle institutionally racist, misogynist and otherwise discriminatory practices against sex workers in police and other agencies, and to (re)commission experience-based, peer-led services by and for sex workers particularly benefiting the most marginalised communities. Future work Realist informed trials, co-produced with sex workers, would provide rigorous evidence on effective approaches to protect sex workers’ health, safety and rights. Funding This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number 15/55/58. Plain language summary Some sex workers experience greater levels of violence, anxiety, depression and drug use than people who do not sell sex. This research evaluated the effects of removing police enforcement on sex workers’ safety and health (violence, depression and anxiety) and access to health and social care in East London. The study was participatory: co-researchers with lived experience of sex work or of working closely with sex workers worked with university-based researchers to design, conduct and disseminate the research. We conducted qualitative research (interviews and neighbourhood walks) to understand how police enforcement affected sex workers’ safety, health and service access. We measured how much enforcement affected levels of violence, through a cohort study (recruiting participants and following up with them over time). We then developed a mathematical model to simulate the effects of removing enforcement. In this urban locality, we found that women (cisgender and transgender) who worked on the street experienced far higher levels of police enforcement and reported more violence from all perpetrators, including police themselves, than those working indoors. They reported higher levels of anxiety and depression and were less likely to be getting help for these problems. In our study, sex workers’ safety and mental health were affected by entrenched poverty, insecure housing, police enforcement and service cuts. Cisgender and transgender women who worked on the street, used drugs, were migrants and/or were women of colour were particularly targeted for enforcement, denied justice and affected by funding cuts to specialist health and support services. Ethnically and racially minoritised sex workers more frequently worked in lower-paid, street-based settings and, regardless of work setting, were more frequently arrested and imprisoned. Our mathematical modelling suggested that stopping the displacement of street-based sex workers alongside the provision of housing could result in a significant (71%) reduction in client violence. Participants recommended redirecting funds from enforcement towards respectful, peer-led services. Findings add weight to existing international evidence on ending enforcement against sex workers and the need to address other of violence and poor health, including reducing poverty, providing housing and commissioning appropriate, community-led services for sex workers.https://doi.org/10.3310/GFVC7006sex workparticipatoryviolencepolice enforcementmental healthinequalitiesstructural determinants
spellingShingle Pippa Grenfell
Jocelyn Elmes
Rachel Stuart
Janet Eastham
Josephine Walker
Chrissy Browne
Carolyn Henham
M Paz Hernandez Blanco
Kathleen Hill
Sibongile Rutsito
Maggie O’Neill
MD Sarker
Sarah Creighton
Peter Vickerman
Marie-Claude Boily
Lucy Platt
East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East London
Public Health Research
sex work
participatory
violence
police enforcement
mental health
inequalities
structural determinants
title East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East London
title_full East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East London
title_fullStr East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East London
title_full_unstemmed East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East London
title_short East London Project: a participatory mixed-method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers' safety, health and access to services in East London
title_sort east london project a participatory mixed method evaluation on how removing enforcement could affect sex workers safety health and access to services in east london
topic sex work
participatory
violence
police enforcement
mental health
inequalities
structural determinants
url https://doi.org/10.3310/GFVC7006
work_keys_str_mv AT pippagrenfell eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT jocelynelmes eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT rachelstuart eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT janeteastham eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT josephinewalker eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT chrissybrowne eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT carolynhenham eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT mpazhernandezblanco eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT kathleenhill eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT sibongilerutsito eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT maggieoneill eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT mdsarker eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT sarahcreighton eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT petervickerman eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT marieclaudeboily eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon
AT lucyplatt eastlondonprojectaparticipatorymixedmethodevaluationonhowremovingenforcementcouldaffectsexworkerssafetyhealthandaccesstoservicesineastlondon