Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle

Recently, the Zilsel review published a special issue on artificial intelligence that merits the attention of the entire community of researchers in the humanities and social sciences given the importance of the stakes associated with it. This dossier, which was coordinated by Olessia Kirtchik, brin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean-Sébastien Vayre
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Société d'Anthropologie des Connaissances 2021-03-01
Series:Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/rac/19266
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850188526837039104
author Jean-Sébastien Vayre
author_facet Jean-Sébastien Vayre
author_sort Jean-Sébastien Vayre
collection DOAJ
description Recently, the Zilsel review published a special issue on artificial intelligence that merits the attention of the entire community of researchers in the humanities and social sciences given the importance of the stakes associated with it. This dossier, which was coordinated by Olessia Kirtchik, brings together the contributions of four specialists: Francis Chateauraynaud, Harry Collins, Fabian Muniesa and Andrew Pickering. Also, in this article, I propose to discuss these four contributions in order to point out their advantages and their limits to constitute what could be called a sociology of artificial intelligence. In this way, I will show that it is possible to understand the perspectives of the above-mentioned authors as a coherent assemblage of points of view offering a plural and critical view of artificial intelligence.
format Article
id doaj-art-87a3fd17c8bb4d0eb1a35e22aaef967e
institution OA Journals
issn 1760-5393
language fra
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Société d'Anthropologie des Connaissances
record_format Article
series Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances
spelling doaj-art-87a3fd17c8bb4d0eb1a35e22aaef967e2025-08-20T02:15:52ZfraSociété d'Anthropologie des ConnaissancesRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances1760-53932021-03-0115110.4000/rac.19266Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielleJean-Sébastien VayreRecently, the Zilsel review published a special issue on artificial intelligence that merits the attention of the entire community of researchers in the humanities and social sciences given the importance of the stakes associated with it. This dossier, which was coordinated by Olessia Kirtchik, brings together the contributions of four specialists: Francis Chateauraynaud, Harry Collins, Fabian Muniesa and Andrew Pickering. Also, in this article, I propose to discuss these four contributions in order to point out their advantages and their limits to constitute what could be called a sociology of artificial intelligence. In this way, I will show that it is possible to understand the perspectives of the above-mentioned authors as a coherent assemblage of points of view offering a plural and critical view of artificial intelligence.https://journals.openedition.org/rac/19266sociologypluralismartificial intelligencecriticismsymmetry
spellingShingle Jean-Sébastien Vayre
Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle
Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances
sociology
pluralism
artificial intelligence
criticism
symmetry
title Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle
title_full Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle
title_fullStr Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle
title_full_unstemmed Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle
title_short Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle
title_sort pour une critique plurielle de l intelligence artificielle
topic sociology
pluralism
artificial intelligence
criticism
symmetry
url https://journals.openedition.org/rac/19266
work_keys_str_mv AT jeansebastienvayre pourunecritiqueplurielledelintelligenceartificielle