Pour une critique plurielle de l’intelligence artificielle
Recently, the Zilsel review published a special issue on artificial intelligence that merits the attention of the entire community of researchers in the humanities and social sciences given the importance of the stakes associated with it. This dossier, which was coordinated by Olessia Kirtchik, brin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Société d'Anthropologie des Connaissances
2021-03-01
|
| Series: | Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/rac/19266 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Recently, the Zilsel review published a special issue on artificial intelligence that merits the attention of the entire community of researchers in the humanities and social sciences given the importance of the stakes associated with it. This dossier, which was coordinated by Olessia Kirtchik, brings together the contributions of four specialists: Francis Chateauraynaud, Harry Collins, Fabian Muniesa and Andrew Pickering. Also, in this article, I propose to discuss these four contributions in order to point out their advantages and their limits to constitute what could be called a sociology of artificial intelligence. In this way, I will show that it is possible to understand the perspectives of the above-mentioned authors as a coherent assemblage of points of view offering a plural and critical view of artificial intelligence. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1760-5393 |