Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS Observations
Abstract Volcanic eruptions provide broad spectral forcing to the atmosphere and understanding the primary mechanisms that are relevant to explain the variety in waveform characteristics in the Ionosphere‐Thermosphere (IT) is still an important open question for the community. In this study, Global...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Space Weather |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003502 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841536416497008640 |
---|---|
author | J. Tyska Y. Deng S. Zhang C. Y. Lin |
author_facet | J. Tyska Y. Deng S. Zhang C. Y. Lin |
author_sort | J. Tyska |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Volcanic eruptions provide broad spectral forcing to the atmosphere and understanding the primary mechanisms that are relevant to explain the variety in waveform characteristics in the Ionosphere‐Thermosphere (IT) is still an important open question for the community. In this study, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Total Electron Content (TEC) data are analyzed and compared to simulations performed by the Global Ionosphere‐Thermosphere Model with Local Mesh Refinement (GITM‐R) for the first phase of the 2015 Calbuco eruption that occurred on 22 April. A simplified source representation and spectral acoustic‐gravity wave (AGW) propagation model are used to specify the perturbation at the lower boundary of GITM‐R at 100 km altitude. Two assumptions on the propagation structure, Direct Spherical (DS) and Ground Coupled (GC), are compared to the GNSS data and these modeling specifications show good agreement with different aspects of the observations for some waveform characteristics. Most notably, GITM‐R is able to reproduce the relative wave amplitude of AGWs as a function of radial distance from the vent, showing acoustic dominant forcing in the near field (<500 km) and gravity dominant forcing in the far‐field (>500 km). The estimated apparent phase speeds from GITM‐R simulations are consistent with observations with ∼10% difference from observation for both acoustic wave packets and a trailing gravity mode. The relevance of the simplifications made in the lower atmosphere to the simulated IT response is then discussed. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8775306aee934b93b12f1e6fb3535059 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1542-7390 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Space Weather |
spelling | doaj-art-8775306aee934b93b12f1e6fb35350592025-01-14T16:30:41ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-02-01222n/an/a10.1029/2023SW003502Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS ObservationsJ. Tyska0Y. Deng1S. Zhang2C. Y. Lin3University of Texas at Arlington Arlington TX USAUniversity of Texas at Arlington Arlington TX USAMassachusetts Institute of Technology Haystack Observatory Westford MA USANational Central University Taoyuan TaiwanAbstract Volcanic eruptions provide broad spectral forcing to the atmosphere and understanding the primary mechanisms that are relevant to explain the variety in waveform characteristics in the Ionosphere‐Thermosphere (IT) is still an important open question for the community. In this study, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Total Electron Content (TEC) data are analyzed and compared to simulations performed by the Global Ionosphere‐Thermosphere Model with Local Mesh Refinement (GITM‐R) for the first phase of the 2015 Calbuco eruption that occurred on 22 April. A simplified source representation and spectral acoustic‐gravity wave (AGW) propagation model are used to specify the perturbation at the lower boundary of GITM‐R at 100 km altitude. Two assumptions on the propagation structure, Direct Spherical (DS) and Ground Coupled (GC), are compared to the GNSS data and these modeling specifications show good agreement with different aspects of the observations for some waveform characteristics. Most notably, GITM‐R is able to reproduce the relative wave amplitude of AGWs as a function of radial distance from the vent, showing acoustic dominant forcing in the near field (<500 km) and gravity dominant forcing in the far‐field (>500 km). The estimated apparent phase speeds from GITM‐R simulations are consistent with observations with ∼10% difference from observation for both acoustic wave packets and a trailing gravity mode. The relevance of the simplifications made in the lower atmosphere to the simulated IT response is then discussed.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003502acoustic‐gravity wavesionosphere‐thermosphere couplingnatural hazard |
spellingShingle | J. Tyska Y. Deng S. Zhang C. Y. Lin Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS Observations Space Weather acoustic‐gravity waves ionosphere‐thermosphere coupling natural hazard |
title | Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS Observations |
title_full | Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS Observations |
title_fullStr | Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS Observations |
title_full_unstemmed | Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS Observations |
title_short | Ionospheric Disturbances Generated by the 2015 Calbuco Eruption: Comparison of GITM‐R Simulations and GNSS Observations |
title_sort | ionospheric disturbances generated by the 2015 calbuco eruption comparison of gitm r simulations and gnss observations |
topic | acoustic‐gravity waves ionosphere‐thermosphere coupling natural hazard |
url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jtyska ionosphericdisturbancesgeneratedbythe2015calbucoeruptioncomparisonofgitmrsimulationsandgnssobservations AT ydeng ionosphericdisturbancesgeneratedbythe2015calbucoeruptioncomparisonofgitmrsimulationsandgnssobservations AT szhang ionosphericdisturbancesgeneratedbythe2015calbucoeruptioncomparisonofgitmrsimulationsandgnssobservations AT cylin ionosphericdisturbancesgeneratedbythe2015calbucoeruptioncomparisonofgitmrsimulationsandgnssobservations |