Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-Frying

Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, combined with multivariate calibration techniques such as stepwise decorrelation of variables (SELECT) and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, was used to develop robust, reduced-spectrum regression models for quantifying key phenolic compound markers in variou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taha Mehany, José M. González-Sáiz, Consuelo Pizarro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Antioxidants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/6/672
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850156152158945280
author Taha Mehany
José M. González-Sáiz
Consuelo Pizarro
author_facet Taha Mehany
José M. González-Sáiz
Consuelo Pizarro
author_sort Taha Mehany
collection DOAJ
description Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, combined with multivariate calibration techniques such as stepwise decorrelation of variables (SELECT) and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, was used to develop robust, reduced-spectrum regression models for quantifying key phenolic compound markers in various olive oils. These oils included nine extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) varieties, refined olive oil (ROO) blended with virgin olive oil (VOO) or EVOO, and pomace olive oil, both with and without hydroxytyrosol (HTyr) supplementation. Olive oils were analyzed before and after deep frying. The results show that HTyr ranged from 7.28 mg/kg in Manzanilla (lowest) to 21.43 mg/kg in Royuela (highest). Tyrosol (Tyr) varied from 5.87 mg/kg in Royuela (lowest) to 14.86 mg/kg in Hojiblanca (highest). Similar trends were observed in all phenolic fractions across olive oil cultivars before and after deep-frying. HTyr supplementation significantly increased both HTyr and Tyr levels in non-fried and fried supplemented oils, with HTyr rising from single digits in some controls (around 0 mg/kg) to over 300 mg/kg in most of the supplemented samples. SELECT efficiently reduced redundancy by selecting the most vital wavelengths and thus significantly improved the regression models for key phenolic compounds, including HTyr, Tyr, caffeic acid, decarboxymethyl ligstroside aglycone in dialdehyde form (oleocanthal), decarboxymethyl oleuropein aglycone in dialdehyde form (oleacein), homovanillic acid, pinoresinol, oleuropein aglycone in oxidized aldehyde and hydroxylic form (OAOAH), ligstroside aglycone in oxidized aldehyde and hydroxylic form (LAOAH), and total phenolic content (TPC), achieving correlation coefficients (R) of 0.91–0.98. The SELECT-OLS method generated highly predictive models with minimal complexity, using at most 30 wavelengths out of 700. The number of decorrelated predictors varied, at 12, 14, 15, 30, 30, 21, 30, 30, 30, and 18 for HTyr, Tyr, caffeic acid, oleocanthal, oleacein, homovanillic acid, pinoresinol, OAOAH, LAOAH, and TPC, respectively, demonstrating the adaptability of the SELECT-OLS approach to different spectral patterns. These reliable calibration models enabled online and routine quantification of phenolic compounds in EVOO, VOO, ROO, including both non-fried and fried as well as supplemented and non-supplemented samples. They performed well across eight deep-frying conditions (3–6 h at 170–210 °C). Implementing an NIR instrument with optimized variable selection would simplify spectral analysis and reduce costs. The developed models all demonstrated strong predictive performance, with low leave-one-out mean prediction errors (LOOMPEs) with values of 15.69, 8.47, 3.64, 9.18, 16.71, 3.26, 8.57, 13.56, 56.36, and 82.38 mg/kg for HTyr, Tyr, caffeic acid, oleocanthal, oleacein, homovanillic acid, pinoresinol, OAOAH, LAOAH, and TPC, respectively. These results confirm that NIR spectroscopy combined with SELECT-OLS is a feasible, rapid, non-destructive, and eco-friendly tool for the reliable evaluation and quantification of phenolic content in edible oils.
format Article
id doaj-art-8718a2a1eebf4438b0e7e47136655440
institution OA Journals
issn 2076-3921
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Antioxidants
spelling doaj-art-8718a2a1eebf4438b0e7e471366554402025-08-20T02:24:39ZengMDPI AGAntioxidants2076-39212025-05-0114667210.3390/antiox14060672Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-FryingTaha Mehany0José M. González-Sáiz1Consuelo Pizarro2Department of Chemistry, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, SpainDepartment of Chemistry, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, SpainDepartment of Chemistry, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, SpainNear-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, combined with multivariate calibration techniques such as stepwise decorrelation of variables (SELECT) and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, was used to develop robust, reduced-spectrum regression models for quantifying key phenolic compound markers in various olive oils. These oils included nine extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) varieties, refined olive oil (ROO) blended with virgin olive oil (VOO) or EVOO, and pomace olive oil, both with and without hydroxytyrosol (HTyr) supplementation. Olive oils were analyzed before and after deep frying. The results show that HTyr ranged from 7.28 mg/kg in Manzanilla (lowest) to 21.43 mg/kg in Royuela (highest). Tyrosol (Tyr) varied from 5.87 mg/kg in Royuela (lowest) to 14.86 mg/kg in Hojiblanca (highest). Similar trends were observed in all phenolic fractions across olive oil cultivars before and after deep-frying. HTyr supplementation significantly increased both HTyr and Tyr levels in non-fried and fried supplemented oils, with HTyr rising from single digits in some controls (around 0 mg/kg) to over 300 mg/kg in most of the supplemented samples. SELECT efficiently reduced redundancy by selecting the most vital wavelengths and thus significantly improved the regression models for key phenolic compounds, including HTyr, Tyr, caffeic acid, decarboxymethyl ligstroside aglycone in dialdehyde form (oleocanthal), decarboxymethyl oleuropein aglycone in dialdehyde form (oleacein), homovanillic acid, pinoresinol, oleuropein aglycone in oxidized aldehyde and hydroxylic form (OAOAH), ligstroside aglycone in oxidized aldehyde and hydroxylic form (LAOAH), and total phenolic content (TPC), achieving correlation coefficients (R) of 0.91–0.98. The SELECT-OLS method generated highly predictive models with minimal complexity, using at most 30 wavelengths out of 700. The number of decorrelated predictors varied, at 12, 14, 15, 30, 30, 21, 30, 30, 30, and 18 for HTyr, Tyr, caffeic acid, oleocanthal, oleacein, homovanillic acid, pinoresinol, OAOAH, LAOAH, and TPC, respectively, demonstrating the adaptability of the SELECT-OLS approach to different spectral patterns. These reliable calibration models enabled online and routine quantification of phenolic compounds in EVOO, VOO, ROO, including both non-fried and fried as well as supplemented and non-supplemented samples. They performed well across eight deep-frying conditions (3–6 h at 170–210 °C). Implementing an NIR instrument with optimized variable selection would simplify spectral analysis and reduce costs. The developed models all demonstrated strong predictive performance, with low leave-one-out mean prediction errors (LOOMPEs) with values of 15.69, 8.47, 3.64, 9.18, 16.71, 3.26, 8.57, 13.56, 56.36, and 82.38 mg/kg for HTyr, Tyr, caffeic acid, oleocanthal, oleacein, homovanillic acid, pinoresinol, OAOAH, LAOAH, and TPC, respectively. These results confirm that NIR spectroscopy combined with SELECT-OLS is a feasible, rapid, non-destructive, and eco-friendly tool for the reliable evaluation and quantification of phenolic content in edible oils.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/6/672antioxidantscaffeic acidcalibration modelsEVOOhydroxytyrosolligstroside aglycone
spellingShingle Taha Mehany
José M. González-Sáiz
Consuelo Pizarro
Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-Frying
Antioxidants
antioxidants
caffeic acid
calibration models
EVOO
hydroxytyrosol
ligstroside aglycone
title Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-Frying
title_full Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-Frying
title_fullStr Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-Frying
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-Frying
title_short Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Olive Oils by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multiple Regression: Effects of Cultivar, Hydroxytyrosol Supplementation, and Deep-Frying
title_sort quantification of phenolic compounds in olive oils by near infrared spectroscopy and multiple regression effects of cultivar hydroxytyrosol supplementation and deep frying
topic antioxidants
caffeic acid
calibration models
EVOO
hydroxytyrosol
ligstroside aglycone
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/6/672
work_keys_str_mv AT tahamehany quantificationofphenoliccompoundsinoliveoilsbynearinfraredspectroscopyandmultipleregressioneffectsofcultivarhydroxytyrosolsupplementationanddeepfrying
AT josemgonzalezsaiz quantificationofphenoliccompoundsinoliveoilsbynearinfraredspectroscopyandmultipleregressioneffectsofcultivarhydroxytyrosolsupplementationanddeepfrying
AT consuelopizarro quantificationofphenoliccompoundsinoliveoilsbynearinfraredspectroscopyandmultipleregressioneffectsofcultivarhydroxytyrosolsupplementationanddeepfrying