The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism
This exploration addresses some aspects of Zoroastrianism, examining how the ancient Persian belief system aligns with the dynamic and indeterminate principles of Fuzzy, Neutrosophic, and MultiAlist systems. Zoroastrianism, rooted in the eternal struggle between good and evil, light and darkness, e...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education,
2024-02-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.journal-fea.com/article_190173_280d116da5cafb50c719499d23d3fbee.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832577823854821376 |
|---|---|
| author | Florentin Smarandache |
| author_facet | Florentin Smarandache |
| author_sort | Florentin Smarandache |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This exploration addresses some aspects of Zoroastrianism, examining how the ancient Persian belief system aligns with the dynamic and indeterminate principles of Fuzzy, Neutrosophic, and MultiAlist systems. Zoroastrianism, rooted in the eternal struggle between good and evil, light and darkness, exhibits parallels with Neutrosophy's acknowledgment of indeterminacy, incompleteness, and the dynamic interplay of opposites. The prophet Zarathustra's vision of a neutrosophic God challenges conventional notions of divine attributes, emphasizing a dynamic and evolving universe. Before investigating these vague areas, the concept of unclear conceptual borders is explored, emphasizing the indeterminacy and imprecision inherent in defining opposites or partially opposite concepts. The law of included infinitely-many-middles suggests that between opposites, there exist infinitely many nuances or middle values. Sorites' paradoxes challenge traditional logic by exposing the difficulties in defining vague boundaries. Neutrosophic Interpretation suggests introducing a buffer zone between opposites, resulting in Neutrosophic Sorites Paradoxes. Moreover, this exploration highlights the need for a more flexible and nuanced understanding of conceptual boundaries, acknowledging the dynamic and indeterminate nature of many philosophical and logical constructs. Finally, we delve into the application of neutrosophy to various cultural and philosophical concepts. The legendary figure of Gilgamesh, described as two-thirds god and one-third human, is examined through both traditional and neutrosophic perspectives. Additionally, Hindu concepts of Dharma, Adharma, and Karma are reexamined within the context of neutrosophy. The logic of the Diamond Sutra in Mahayana Buddhism, characterized by paradoxical language and a focus on emptiness, aligns with neutrosophic principles in challenging fixed notions and embracing the interconnected and indeterminate aspects of reality. Despite diverse cultural origins, these examples share a common thread in questioning absolutes and embracing the dynamic nature of existence. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8709a4224fa147d1a3c8f93e8e0de406 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2783-1442 2717-3453 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
| publisher | Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications |
| spelling | doaj-art-8709a4224fa147d1a3c8f93e8e0de4062025-01-30T15:07:00ZengAyandegan Institute of Higher Education,Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications2783-14422717-34532024-02-015111510.22105/jfea.2024.190173190173The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianismFlorentin Smarandache0Mathematics, Physics and Natural Science Division, University of New Mexico 705 Gurley Ave., Gallup, NM 87301, USA.This exploration addresses some aspects of Zoroastrianism, examining how the ancient Persian belief system aligns with the dynamic and indeterminate principles of Fuzzy, Neutrosophic, and MultiAlist systems. Zoroastrianism, rooted in the eternal struggle between good and evil, light and darkness, exhibits parallels with Neutrosophy's acknowledgment of indeterminacy, incompleteness, and the dynamic interplay of opposites. The prophet Zarathustra's vision of a neutrosophic God challenges conventional notions of divine attributes, emphasizing a dynamic and evolving universe. Before investigating these vague areas, the concept of unclear conceptual borders is explored, emphasizing the indeterminacy and imprecision inherent in defining opposites or partially opposite concepts. The law of included infinitely-many-middles suggests that between opposites, there exist infinitely many nuances or middle values. Sorites' paradoxes challenge traditional logic by exposing the difficulties in defining vague boundaries. Neutrosophic Interpretation suggests introducing a buffer zone between opposites, resulting in Neutrosophic Sorites Paradoxes. Moreover, this exploration highlights the need for a more flexible and nuanced understanding of conceptual boundaries, acknowledging the dynamic and indeterminate nature of many philosophical and logical constructs. Finally, we delve into the application of neutrosophy to various cultural and philosophical concepts. The legendary figure of Gilgamesh, described as two-thirds god and one-third human, is examined through both traditional and neutrosophic perspectives. Additionally, Hindu concepts of Dharma, Adharma, and Karma are reexamined within the context of neutrosophy. The logic of the Diamond Sutra in Mahayana Buddhism, characterized by paradoxical language and a focus on emptiness, aligns with neutrosophic principles in challenging fixed notions and embracing the interconnected and indeterminate aspects of reality. Despite diverse cultural origins, these examples share a common thread in questioning absolutes and embracing the dynamic nature of existence.https://www.journal-fea.com/article_190173_280d116da5cafb50c719499d23d3fbee.pdfzoroastrianismzarathustraahura mazdagilgameshdharmaadharmakarmahappinessdiamond sutrachinvat bridgecyrus the gratevaguenessneutrosophysorites paradoxesneutrosophic sorites paradoxesfuzzy informationgranulationmultialismmultialist systemsmulipolar thinking |
| spellingShingle | Florentin Smarandache The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications zoroastrianism zarathustra ahura mazda gilgamesh dharma adharma karma happiness diamond sutra chinvat bridge cyrus the grate vagueness neutrosophy sorites paradoxes neutrosophic sorites paradoxes fuzzy information granulation multialism multialist systems mulipolar thinking |
| title | The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism |
| title_full | The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism |
| title_fullStr | The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism |
| title_full_unstemmed | The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism |
| title_short | The dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism |
| title_sort | dynamic interplay of opposites in zoroastrianism |
| topic | zoroastrianism zarathustra ahura mazda gilgamesh dharma adharma karma happiness diamond sutra chinvat bridge cyrus the grate vagueness neutrosophy sorites paradoxes neutrosophic sorites paradoxes fuzzy information granulation multialism multialist systems mulipolar thinking |
| url | https://www.journal-fea.com/article_190173_280d116da5cafb50c719499d23d3fbee.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT florentinsmarandache thedynamicinterplayofoppositesinzoroastrianism AT florentinsmarandache dynamicinterplayofoppositesinzoroastrianism |