Comparative Liquid Chromatographic Study for Concurrent Determination of Canagliflozin and Metformin in Combined Tablets

New HPLC-UV method (method A), for simultaneous determination of metformin (MET) and canagliflozin (CANA), was developed and compared to another novel UPLC-UV method (method B) in their tablet combination. Concerning method A, isocratic separation was done by C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 3 μm) using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wafaa A. Zaghary, Shereen Mowaka, Moataz S. Hendy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9197230
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:New HPLC-UV method (method A), for simultaneous determination of metformin (MET) and canagliflozin (CANA), was developed and compared to another novel UPLC-UV method (method B) in their tablet combination. Concerning method A, isocratic separation was done by C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 3 μm) using methanol and 0.03 M phosphate buffer (75:25, v/v) at pH 3.2 as a mobile phase. Meanwhile, chromatographic separation in method B was achieved via Hypersil® gold (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm). Mobile phase was methanol and 0.03 M phosphate buffer at ratio of 80:20  v/v. In both, detection was done at wavelength of 240 nm. Method A showed satisfactory linearity results over 1–50 μg·mL−1 and 0.5–100 μg·mL−1, while method B linearity was at 0.1–50 μg·mL−1 and 0.25–100 μg·mL−1 for CANA and MET, respectively. In terms of accuracy and precision, method A accuracy was 99.81±0.73 and 99.37±0.54, while method B gave accuracy of 99.47±1.03 and 99.73±0.89 for CANA and MET, respectively. For precision, the % RSD was found to be less than 2% for three concentrations analyzed three times. The two methods are convenient for quality laboratories, yet the UPLC method offered the advantage of shorter run times and higher sensitivity.
ISSN:2090-8865
2090-8873