From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists' awareness of academic controversies.
This study sheds light on how journalists respond to evolving debates within academia around topics including research integrity, improper use of metrics to measure research quality and impact, and the risks and benefits of the open science movement. It does so through a codebook thematic analysis o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Alice Fleerackers, Laura L Moorhead, Juan Pablo Alperin, Michelle Riedlinger, Lauren A Maggio |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309274 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Second-order citations in altmetrics: A case study analyzing the audiences of COVID-19 research in the news and on social media
by: Juan Pablo Alperin, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Unreviewed science in the news: The evolution of preprint media coverage from 2014–2021
by: Alice Fleerackers, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas
by: Natascha Chtena, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01) -
“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Natascha Chtena, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
“It’s messy and it’s massive”: How has the open science debate developed in the post-COVID era? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Natascha Chtena, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01)