Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)

Introduction Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical treatment to lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Although it has been proven to have substantial efficacy in improving functional outcomes, it has shown a high incidence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Chen, Bi-Ming He, Zhen-Kai Shi, Hai-Feng Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-01-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e092489.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850147044986978304
author Rui Chen
Bi-Ming He
Zhen-Kai Shi
Hai-Feng Wang
author_facet Rui Chen
Bi-Ming He
Zhen-Kai Shi
Hai-Feng Wang
author_sort Rui Chen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical treatment to lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Although it has been proven to have substantial efficacy in improving functional outcomes, it has shown a high incidence of complications, including transurethral resection syndrome, massive bleeding, urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) is a novel non-thermal ablation technique that delivers pulsed high-voltage but low-energy electric current to the cell membrane, thereby leading to cell death. H-FIRE has been reported to be tissue-selective, which leads to fewer side effects. However, no data are available on whether H-FIRE is non-inferior compared with TURP in treating patients with LUTS/BPO regarding safety and efficacy.Methods and analysis This trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled, double-blinded and non-inferiority study in which all men with LUTS/BPO are included. This study aims to determine whether the HI-FIRE is non-inferior to TURP for achieving better functional outcomes as measured by the co-primary outcome of the change from baseline in maximal flow rate (Qmax) and the urinary symptoms by questionnaire of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scoring at 3 months after surgical treatment. The main inclusion criteria are men with prostatic volume range 30 to 100 mL, Qmax<15 mL/s and IPSS>8. A sample size of 118 participants is required, accounting for a 20% loss. All participants will be randomly allocated at a ratio of 1:1 to the H-FIRE arm (n=59) and the TURP arm (n=59). The primary outcome is to assess the change from baseline in Qmax and IPSS scoring at 3 months after surgical treatment.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. The results of the study will be disseminated and published in international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05306145.
format Article
id doaj-art-862d39e5a8734ef38e5d6cfd5b6b0a96
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-862d39e5a8734ef38e5d6cfd5b6b0a962025-08-20T02:27:41ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-01-0115110.1136/bmjopen-2024-092489Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)Rui Chen0Bi-Ming He1Zhen-Kai Shi2Hai-Feng Wang32 Department of Urology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China1 Department of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China1 Department of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China1 Department of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaIntroduction Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical treatment to lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Although it has been proven to have substantial efficacy in improving functional outcomes, it has shown a high incidence of complications, including transurethral resection syndrome, massive bleeding, urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) is a novel non-thermal ablation technique that delivers pulsed high-voltage but low-energy electric current to the cell membrane, thereby leading to cell death. H-FIRE has been reported to be tissue-selective, which leads to fewer side effects. However, no data are available on whether H-FIRE is non-inferior compared with TURP in treating patients with LUTS/BPO regarding safety and efficacy.Methods and analysis This trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled, double-blinded and non-inferiority study in which all men with LUTS/BPO are included. This study aims to determine whether the HI-FIRE is non-inferior to TURP for achieving better functional outcomes as measured by the co-primary outcome of the change from baseline in maximal flow rate (Qmax) and the urinary symptoms by questionnaire of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scoring at 3 months after surgical treatment. The main inclusion criteria are men with prostatic volume range 30 to 100 mL, Qmax<15 mL/s and IPSS>8. A sample size of 118 participants is required, accounting for a 20% loss. All participants will be randomly allocated at a ratio of 1:1 to the H-FIRE arm (n=59) and the TURP arm (n=59). The primary outcome is to assess the change from baseline in Qmax and IPSS scoring at 3 months after surgical treatment.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. The results of the study will be disseminated and published in international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05306145.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e092489.full
spellingShingle Rui Chen
Bi-Ming He
Zhen-Kai Shi
Hai-Feng Wang
Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)
BMJ Open
title Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)
title_full Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)
title_fullStr Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)
title_short Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial)
title_sort study protocol for a single centre non inferior double blinded randomised controlled trial in china comparing the efficacy and safety of high frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction the giant trial
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/1/e092489.full
work_keys_str_mv AT ruichen studyprotocolforasinglecentrenoninferiordoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialinchinacomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofhighfrequencyirreversibleelectroporationwithtransurethralresectionoftheprostateintreatinglowerurinarytractsymptomsandbenignprostaticobstruc
AT biminghe studyprotocolforasinglecentrenoninferiordoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialinchinacomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofhighfrequencyirreversibleelectroporationwithtransurethralresectionoftheprostateintreatinglowerurinarytractsymptomsandbenignprostaticobstruc
AT zhenkaishi studyprotocolforasinglecentrenoninferiordoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialinchinacomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofhighfrequencyirreversibleelectroporationwithtransurethralresectionoftheprostateintreatinglowerurinarytractsymptomsandbenignprostaticobstruc
AT haifengwang studyprotocolforasinglecentrenoninferiordoubleblindedrandomisedcontrolledtrialinchinacomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofhighfrequencyirreversibleelectroporationwithtransurethralresectionoftheprostateintreatinglowerurinarytractsymptomsandbenignprostaticobstruc