Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of paraspinal muscle morphology and composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSA). Methods This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022371879). Four databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fangda Si, Aobo Wang, Ying Chen, Ning Fan, Tianyi Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09047-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849767077447991296
author Fangda Si
Aobo Wang
Ying Chen
Ning Fan
Tianyi Wang
author_facet Fangda Si
Aobo Wang
Ying Chen
Ning Fan
Tianyi Wang
author_sort Fangda Si
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of paraspinal muscle morphology and composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSA). Methods This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022371879). Four databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from their inception until December 15, 2024. The scope of paraspinal muscles included multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), psoas major (PM), and paraspinal extensor muscles (PEM; combined multifidus and erector spinae). The cross-sectional area (CSA) and fat signal fraction (FSF) were the metrics for quantifying paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, respectively. The outcomes of interest were SSA parameters, including C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI minus LL mismatch (PI − LL). The methodological quality and risk of bias of each included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and its adapted form. Correlation coefficients extracted from included studies were transformed to a Fisher’s z correlational coefficient to perform a meta-analysis and to generate a pooled effect size (z) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Sixteen observational studies with 1535 participants were included in the meta-analysis. We found a positive association of paraspinal muscle CSA with TK (MFCSA, z = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.32, p = 0.041; PEMCSA, z = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.28, p = 0.002) and LL (PMCSA, z = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.22, p = 0.019), whereas a negative correlation with SVA (MFCSA, z = − 0.35, 95% CI: −0.67 to − 0.02, p = 0.036; PEMCSA, z = − 0.25, 95% CI: −0.45 to − 0.05, p = 0.015), PT (PMCSA, z = − 0.22, 95% CI: −0.39 to − 0.05, p = 0.012), PI (PMCSA, z = − 0.13, 95% CI: −0.23 to − 0.02, p = 0.020), and PI-LL (MFCSA, z = − 0.50, 95% CI: −0.69 to − 0.30, p < 0.00001; PMCSA, z = − 0.20, 95% CI: −0.34 to − 0.05, p = 0.007; PEMCSA, z = − 0.28, 95% CI: −0.38 to − 0.18, p < 0.00001). Meanwhile, paraspinal muscle FSF showed a positive correlation with SVA (PEMFSF, z = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.47, p < 0.00001), PT (PEMFSF, z = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.54, p < 0.00001), and PI-LL (PEMFSF, z = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.41, p < 0.00001), while a negative correlation with PI (PMFSF, z = − 0.14, 95% CI: −0.27 to − 0.01, p = 0.029) and SS (PEMFSF, z = − 0.25, 95% CI: −0.41 to − 0.08, p = 0.004). We also observed the associations were stronger in populations without degenerative spinal diseases, in studies that used computed tomography for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition assessment, and in studies with moderate study quality. Of the 15 significant associations reported here, only 3 were supported by moderate to high-level evidence, while others were supported by very low to low evidence certainty. Conclusion Paraspinal muscle morphology and composition were associated with SSA. Further studies are warranted to establish causality and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
format Article
id doaj-art-862a1ec02a2c442a8f429679888f0bbb
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj-art-862a1ec02a2c442a8f429679888f0bbb2025-08-20T03:04:21ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742025-08-0126112110.1186/s12891-025-09047-3Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysisFangda Si0Aobo Wang1Ying Chen2Ning Fan3Tianyi Wang4Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, China-Japan Friendship HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedics, China-Japan Friendship HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityAbstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of paraspinal muscle morphology and composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSA). Methods This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022371879). Four databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from their inception until December 15, 2024. The scope of paraspinal muscles included multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), psoas major (PM), and paraspinal extensor muscles (PEM; combined multifidus and erector spinae). The cross-sectional area (CSA) and fat signal fraction (FSF) were the metrics for quantifying paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, respectively. The outcomes of interest were SSA parameters, including C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and PI minus LL mismatch (PI − LL). The methodological quality and risk of bias of each included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and its adapted form. Correlation coefficients extracted from included studies were transformed to a Fisher’s z correlational coefficient to perform a meta-analysis and to generate a pooled effect size (z) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Sixteen observational studies with 1535 participants were included in the meta-analysis. We found a positive association of paraspinal muscle CSA with TK (MFCSA, z = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.32, p = 0.041; PEMCSA, z = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.28, p = 0.002) and LL (PMCSA, z = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.22, p = 0.019), whereas a negative correlation with SVA (MFCSA, z = − 0.35, 95% CI: −0.67 to − 0.02, p = 0.036; PEMCSA, z = − 0.25, 95% CI: −0.45 to − 0.05, p = 0.015), PT (PMCSA, z = − 0.22, 95% CI: −0.39 to − 0.05, p = 0.012), PI (PMCSA, z = − 0.13, 95% CI: −0.23 to − 0.02, p = 0.020), and PI-LL (MFCSA, z = − 0.50, 95% CI: −0.69 to − 0.30, p < 0.00001; PMCSA, z = − 0.20, 95% CI: −0.34 to − 0.05, p = 0.007; PEMCSA, z = − 0.28, 95% CI: −0.38 to − 0.18, p < 0.00001). Meanwhile, paraspinal muscle FSF showed a positive correlation with SVA (PEMFSF, z = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.47, p < 0.00001), PT (PEMFSF, z = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.54, p < 0.00001), and PI-LL (PEMFSF, z = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.41, p < 0.00001), while a negative correlation with PI (PMFSF, z = − 0.14, 95% CI: −0.27 to − 0.01, p = 0.029) and SS (PEMFSF, z = − 0.25, 95% CI: −0.41 to − 0.08, p = 0.004). We also observed the associations were stronger in populations without degenerative spinal diseases, in studies that used computed tomography for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition assessment, and in studies with moderate study quality. Of the 15 significant associations reported here, only 3 were supported by moderate to high-level evidence, while others were supported by very low to low evidence certainty. Conclusion Paraspinal muscle morphology and composition were associated with SSA. Further studies are warranted to establish causality and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09047-3Paraspinal musclesSarcopeniaFat infiltrationSagittal spinopelvic alignmentMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Fangda Si
Aobo Wang
Ying Chen
Ning Fan
Tianyi Wang
Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Paraspinal muscles
Sarcopenia
Fat infiltration
Sagittal spinopelvic alignment
Meta-analysis
title Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort association of paraspinal muscle morphology or composition with sagittal spinopelvic alignment a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Paraspinal muscles
Sarcopenia
Fat infiltration
Sagittal spinopelvic alignment
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09047-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fangdasi associationofparaspinalmusclemorphologyorcompositionwithsagittalspinopelvicalignmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aobowang associationofparaspinalmusclemorphologyorcompositionwithsagittalspinopelvicalignmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yingchen associationofparaspinalmusclemorphologyorcompositionwithsagittalspinopelvicalignmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ningfan associationofparaspinalmusclemorphologyorcompositionwithsagittalspinopelvicalignmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianyiwang associationofparaspinalmusclemorphologyorcompositionwithsagittalspinopelvicalignmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis