When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of Others

The current study explored whether other people’s judgments about one’s own performance affect one’s perception of them. In two experiments, participants were provided with scenarios of high (e.g., 90%) or low (e.g., 70%) estimations of exam performance from “others” and “themselves”, as compared to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoonhee Jang, Heungchul Lee, Lisa K. Son
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/1/22
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588635139997696
author Yoonhee Jang
Heungchul Lee
Lisa K. Son
author_facet Yoonhee Jang
Heungchul Lee
Lisa K. Son
author_sort Yoonhee Jang
collection DOAJ
description The current study explored whether other people’s judgments about one’s own performance affect one’s perception of them. In two experiments, participants were provided with scenarios of high (e.g., 90%) or low (e.g., 70%) estimations of exam performance from “others” and “themselves”, as compared to a fixed, benchmark performance score (e.g., 80%). Accordingly, there were four conditions varying by other- and self-estimations: high–high, high–low, low–high, and low–low. Participants were asked to choose the one, given a series of all possible pairs of two peers, who they would get along with better; and who they thought noticed/observed them better. Results showed that participants judged that they would get along with the other who overestimated their performance, suggesting that individuals exhibit a preference for others who demonstrate overconfidence in their abilities. However, they ranked the other with matching (to their own) estimations—either overconfident or underconfident—as having noticed/observed them better. These patterns were consistently found in Likert-scale responses. The results indicate that metacognitive judgments need not necessarily be matching when assessing the performance of another to form relationships, and that both the context and the relation between one’s self and other’s judgments play a large role in social perception.
format Article
id doaj-art-86266d816b904b6fb7eef8fca1b7c8d7
institution Kabale University
issn 2227-7102
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj-art-86266d816b904b6fb7eef8fca1b7c8d72025-01-24T13:30:10ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022024-12-011512210.3390/educsci15010022When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of OthersYoonhee Jang0Heungchul Lee1Lisa K. Son2Department of Psychology, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USANet Intelligence Research, Seoul 01133, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Psychology, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USAThe current study explored whether other people’s judgments about one’s own performance affect one’s perception of them. In two experiments, participants were provided with scenarios of high (e.g., 90%) or low (e.g., 70%) estimations of exam performance from “others” and “themselves”, as compared to a fixed, benchmark performance score (e.g., 80%). Accordingly, there were four conditions varying by other- and self-estimations: high–high, high–low, low–high, and low–low. Participants were asked to choose the one, given a series of all possible pairs of two peers, who they would get along with better; and who they thought noticed/observed them better. Results showed that participants judged that they would get along with the other who overestimated their performance, suggesting that individuals exhibit a preference for others who demonstrate overconfidence in their abilities. However, they ranked the other with matching (to their own) estimations—either overconfident or underconfident—as having noticed/observed them better. These patterns were consistently found in Likert-scale responses. The results indicate that metacognitive judgments need not necessarily be matching when assessing the performance of another to form relationships, and that both the context and the relation between one’s self and other’s judgments play a large role in social perception.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/1/22metacognitionsocial perceptionconfidence judgmentssocial cues
spellingShingle Yoonhee Jang
Heungchul Lee
Lisa K. Son
When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of Others
Education Sciences
metacognition
social perception
confidence judgments
social cues
title When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of Others
title_full When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of Others
title_fullStr When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of Others
title_full_unstemmed When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of Others
title_short When Your Judgment (Mis)Matches Mine: How One’s Self and Others’ Metacognitive Judgments Impact Our Perception of Others
title_sort when your judgment mis matches mine how one s self and others metacognitive judgments impact our perception of others
topic metacognition
social perception
confidence judgments
social cues
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonheejang whenyourjudgmentmismatchesminehowonesselfandothersmetacognitivejudgmentsimpactourperceptionofothers
AT heungchullee whenyourjudgmentmismatchesminehowonesselfandothersmetacognitivejudgmentsimpactourperceptionofothers
AT lisakson whenyourjudgmentmismatchesminehowonesselfandothersmetacognitivejudgmentsimpactourperceptionofothers