Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides

Using the existing two-dimensional experimental data and Open-source Fields Operation and Manipulation (OpenFOAM) software, this study performs a comprehensive comparative analysis of three types of landslide-generated tsunamis (subaerial, partially submerged, and submarine). The primary objective w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomoyuki Takabatake, Ryosei Takemoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:GeoHazards
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2624-795X/5/4/54
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850242189086425088
author Tomoyuki Takabatake
Ryosei Takemoto
author_facet Tomoyuki Takabatake
Ryosei Takemoto
author_sort Tomoyuki Takabatake
collection DOAJ
description Using the existing two-dimensional experimental data and Open-source Fields Operation and Manipulation (OpenFOAM) software, this study performs a comprehensive comparative analysis of three types of landslide-generated tsunamis (subaerial, partially submerged, and submarine). The primary objective was to assess whether numerical simulations can accurately reproduce the experimental results of each type and to compare the predictive equations of the tsunami amplitudes derived from experimental and simulated data. The mesh size and dynamic viscosity parameters were initially optimized for a specific partially submerged landslide tsunami scenario and then applied across a broader range of experimental scenarios. Most of the simulated wave amplitudes remained within the 50% error margin, although significant discrepancies were observed between landslide types. When focusing on the crest amplitude of the first wave, the simulations of subaerial landslides least deviated from the experimental data, with a mean absolute percentage error of approximately 20%, versus approximately 40% for the partially submerged and submarine landslides. The predictive equations derived from the simulations closely matched those from the experimental data, confirming that OpenFOAM can effectively capture complex landslide–tsunami dynamics. Nonetheless, variations in the coefficients related to slope angles highlight the need for further calibration to enhance the simulation fidelity.
format Article
id doaj-art-861ec4ecfeef49a3b4e3fdfeda33b0ba
institution OA Journals
issn 2624-795X
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series GeoHazards
spelling doaj-art-861ec4ecfeef49a3b4e3fdfeda33b0ba2025-08-20T02:00:22ZengMDPI AGGeoHazards2624-795X2024-10-01541152117110.3390/geohazards5040054Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine LandslidesTomoyuki Takabatake0Ryosei Takemoto1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kindai University, Higashi Osaka City 577-8502, Osaka, JapanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kindai University, Higashi Osaka City 577-8502, Osaka, JapanUsing the existing two-dimensional experimental data and Open-source Fields Operation and Manipulation (OpenFOAM) software, this study performs a comprehensive comparative analysis of three types of landslide-generated tsunamis (subaerial, partially submerged, and submarine). The primary objective was to assess whether numerical simulations can accurately reproduce the experimental results of each type and to compare the predictive equations of the tsunami amplitudes derived from experimental and simulated data. The mesh size and dynamic viscosity parameters were initially optimized for a specific partially submerged landslide tsunami scenario and then applied across a broader range of experimental scenarios. Most of the simulated wave amplitudes remained within the 50% error margin, although significant discrepancies were observed between landslide types. When focusing on the crest amplitude of the first wave, the simulations of subaerial landslides least deviated from the experimental data, with a mean absolute percentage error of approximately 20%, versus approximately 40% for the partially submerged and submarine landslides. The predictive equations derived from the simulations closely matched those from the experimental data, confirming that OpenFOAM can effectively capture complex landslide–tsunami dynamics. Nonetheless, variations in the coefficients related to slope angles highlight the need for further calibration to enhance the simulation fidelity.https://www.mdpi.com/2624-795X/5/4/54tsunamilandslidesubaerial landslidepartially submerged landslidesubmarine landslideOpenFOAM
spellingShingle Tomoyuki Takabatake
Ryosei Takemoto
Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides
GeoHazards
tsunami
landslide
subaerial landslide
partially submerged landslide
submarine landslide
OpenFOAM
title Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides
title_full Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides
title_fullStr Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides
title_short Numerical Modeling of Tsunamis Generated by Subaerial, Partially Submerged, and Submarine Landslides
title_sort numerical modeling of tsunamis generated by subaerial partially submerged and submarine landslides
topic tsunami
landslide
subaerial landslide
partially submerged landslide
submarine landslide
OpenFOAM
url https://www.mdpi.com/2624-795X/5/4/54
work_keys_str_mv AT tomoyukitakabatake numericalmodelingoftsunamisgeneratedbysubaerialpartiallysubmergedandsubmarinelandslides
AT ryoseitakemoto numericalmodelingoftsunamisgeneratedbysubaerialpartiallysubmergedandsubmarinelandslides