Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Life-saving or Resource Wasting?
The morbidity and mortality for patients having a cardiac arrest is substantial. Even if optimally performed, conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation is an inadequate substitute for native cardiac output and results in a ‘low-flow’ perfusion state. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Andrea M Elliott, Sean van Diepen, Steven M Hollenberg, Samuel Bernard |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Radcliffe Medical Media
2024-08-01
|
| Series: | US Cardiology Review |
| Online Access: | https://www.uscjournal.com/articleindex/usc.2024.14 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Reply to: Patient selection and early withdrawal of life support in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR): Do we have a problem?
by: Lis Frykler Abazi, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Multi-dimensional outcomes following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
by: Tharusan Thevathasan, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01) -
Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (clinical case)
by: E. G. Gavrilova, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation—Where Do We Currently Stand?
by: Brandon E. Ferrell, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adults with shock‐refractory cardiac arrest
by: Dennis Miraglia, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)