A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for extracting high-positioned supernumerary teeth in the maxillary anterior midline region. Three surgical methods, the labial approach, the palatal approach, and a longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: CHENG Xu, ZHENG Xianyu, DING Ding, HUANG Shanshan, WU Xiaoting, ZHANG Hengguo
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Stomatology 2025-05-01
Series:Kouqiang yixue
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.stomatology.cn/fileup/1003-9872/PDF/1747804518913-2059594312.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850117570830532608
author CHENG Xu, ZHENG Xianyu, DING Ding, HUANG Shanshan, WU Xiaoting, ZHANG Hengguo
author_facet CHENG Xu, ZHENG Xianyu, DING Ding, HUANG Shanshan, WU Xiaoting, ZHANG Hengguo
author_sort CHENG Xu, ZHENG Xianyu, DING Ding, HUANG Shanshan, WU Xiaoting, ZHANG Hengguo
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for extracting high-positioned supernumerary teeth in the maxillary anterior midline region. Three surgical methods, the labial approach, the palatal approach, and a longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were compared. Methods A total of 102 patients were recruited from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Anhui Medical University between January and September 2024. They were randomly assigned via a random-digit table to three groups: the labial approach group (n=32), the palatal approach group (n=34), and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum group (n=36). Operation time, bone removal volume, postoperative midfacial swelling, degree of pain, and patient satisfaction across the three groups were recorded and compared. Results The average operation time in the labial approach group ((20.50±3.02) min) and the longitudinal incision group ((21.66±2.31) min) were both significantly shorter than that in the palatal approach group ((29.19±3.40) min). In contrast, the palatal approach group demonstrated markedly lower postoperative swelling and pain scores (P< 0.05), along with the highest patient satisfaction, as reflected in the OHIP-14 scale. However, the palatal approach required the greatest bone removal volume, measuring (91.19 ± 9.86)mm3. Conclusion Despite the palatal approach yielding superior outcomes in terms of postoperative pain control, swelling reduction, and patient satisfaction, it necessitated longer operation time and involved greater bone removal. Meanwhile, the labial approach and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were comparable in all measured parameters, showing no statistically significant differences. Therefore, when extracting high midline impacted teeth in the maxillary anterior region, the choice of surgical approach should balance safety, minimal invasiveness, and patient satisfaction.
format Article
id doaj-art-86116a7b1be24ef9b291c05ec07abae4
institution OA Journals
issn 1003-9872
language zho
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Editorial Office of Stomatology
record_format Article
series Kouqiang yixue
spelling doaj-art-86116a7b1be24ef9b291c05ec07abae42025-08-20T02:36:03ZzhoEditorial Office of StomatologyKouqiang yixue1003-98722025-05-0145534234610.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2025.05.004A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxillaCHENG Xu, ZHENG Xianyu, DING Ding, HUANG Shanshan, WU Xiaoting, ZHANG Hengguo0College & Hospital of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University, Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province, Hefei 230032, ChinaObjective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches for extracting high-positioned supernumerary teeth in the maxillary anterior midline region. Three surgical methods, the labial approach, the palatal approach, and a longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were compared. Methods A total of 102 patients were recruited from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Anhui Medical University between January and September 2024. They were randomly assigned via a random-digit table to three groups: the labial approach group (n=32), the palatal approach group (n=34), and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum group (n=36). Operation time, bone removal volume, postoperative midfacial swelling, degree of pain, and patient satisfaction across the three groups were recorded and compared. Results The average operation time in the labial approach group ((20.50±3.02) min) and the longitudinal incision group ((21.66±2.31) min) were both significantly shorter than that in the palatal approach group ((29.19±3.40) min). In contrast, the palatal approach group demonstrated markedly lower postoperative swelling and pain scores (P< 0.05), along with the highest patient satisfaction, as reflected in the OHIP-14 scale. However, the palatal approach required the greatest bone removal volume, measuring (91.19 ± 9.86)mm3. Conclusion Despite the palatal approach yielding superior outcomes in terms of postoperative pain control, swelling reduction, and patient satisfaction, it necessitated longer operation time and involved greater bone removal. Meanwhile, the labial approach and the longitudinal incision beside the upper lip frenum were comparable in all measured parameters, showing no statistically significant differences. Therefore, when extracting high midline impacted teeth in the maxillary anterior region, the choice of surgical approach should balance safety, minimal invasiveness, and patient satisfaction.https://www.stomatology.cn/fileup/1003-9872/PDF/1747804518913-2059594312.pdf|supernumerary teeth|surgical approach|upper labial frenum|operation time|cone beam ct|visual analogue scale|minimally invasive|patient satisfaction
spellingShingle CHENG Xu, ZHENG Xianyu, DING Ding, HUANG Shanshan, WU Xiaoting, ZHANG Hengguo
A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla
Kouqiang yixue
|supernumerary teeth|surgical approach|upper labial frenum|operation time|cone beam ct|visual analogue scale|minimally invasive|patient satisfaction
title A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla
title_full A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla
title_fullStr A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla
title_full_unstemmed A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla
title_short A clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla
title_sort clinical comparative study on three surgical approaches for the removal of impacted supernumerary teeth in the midline area of the anterior maxilla
topic |supernumerary teeth|surgical approach|upper labial frenum|operation time|cone beam ct|visual analogue scale|minimally invasive|patient satisfaction
url https://www.stomatology.cn/fileup/1003-9872/PDF/1747804518913-2059594312.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chengxuzhengxianyudingdinghuangshanshanwuxiaotingzhanghengguo aclinicalcomparativestudyonthreesurgicalapproachesfortheremovalofimpactedsupernumeraryteethinthemidlineareaoftheanteriormaxilla
AT chengxuzhengxianyudingdinghuangshanshanwuxiaotingzhanghengguo clinicalcomparativestudyonthreesurgicalapproachesfortheremovalofimpactedsupernumeraryteethinthemidlineareaoftheanteriormaxilla