A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation
The present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2011-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Differential Equations |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/169707 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849401240250744832 |
|---|---|
| author | L. Jebli |
| author_facet | L. Jebli |
| author_sort | L. Jebli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and the level of precision, it is found that the direct MoM is more efficient than other iterative CGM. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-85e124e797de457a8ea0ca1848e90912 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-9643 1687-9651 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2011-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Differential Equations |
| spelling | doaj-art-85e124e797de457a8ea0ca1848e909122025-08-20T03:37:49ZengWileyInternational Journal of Differential Equations1687-96431687-96512011-01-01201110.1155/2011/169707169707A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral EquationL. Jebli0Groupe Canal, Radio et Propagation, LPHE-Modélisation et Simulation, Avenue Ibn Battouta, Faculté des Sciences, Rabat, MoroccoThe present paper aims to compare Harrington's direct method of moment (MoM) with the conjugate gradient method (CGM) by evaluating the total current solving the electric field integral equation (EFIE). Based on their performances, the number of iterations needed for convergence, storage, and the level of precision, it is found that the direct MoM is more efficient than other iterative CGM.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/169707 |
| spellingShingle | L. Jebli A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation International Journal of Differential Equations |
| title | A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation |
| title_full | A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation |
| title_fullStr | A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation |
| title_short | A Comparison of Two Methods for Solving Electromagnetic Field Integral Equation |
| title_sort | comparison of two methods for solving electromagnetic field integral equation |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/169707 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ljebli acomparisonoftwomethodsforsolvingelectromagneticfieldintegralequation AT ljebli comparisonoftwomethodsforsolvingelectromagneticfieldintegralequation |