The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community
In this paper, I present a design case of the problem-identification process prior to the initiation of a Networked Improvement Community (NIC). A NIC is a type of research-practice partnership (RPP) that brings together researchers and practitioners to tackle complex problems of practice, and in do...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Stockholm University Press
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | Designs for Learning |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://account.designsforlearning.nu/index.php/su-j-dl/article/view/186 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850197506242117632 |
|---|---|
| author | Julie Kallio |
| author_facet | Julie Kallio |
| author_sort | Julie Kallio |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper, I present a design case of the problem-identification process prior to the initiation of a Networked Improvement Community (NIC). A NIC is a type of research-practice partnership (RPP) that brings together researchers and practitioners to tackle complex problems of practice, and in doing so, proposes a social reorganization of the traditional education change processes. Central to initiating a NIC, and RPPs more broadly, is the identification of a common problem of practice, but this step often takes place before research on a partnership begins. To investigate how a problem of practice is identified, I use the case of PiPNIC, the Personalization in Practice – Networked Improvement Community, in which a team of university-based researchers used participatory design methods to identify a common problem of practice that would ultimately bring together educators from five schools to participate in the NIC. In the case, I show how the research team constructed a rich problem-solution space and identified a different problem of practice than the research team initially conceived. The problem-identification process, I therefore argue, should be included as a critical component of the NIC initiation framework, and I suggest the “problem-solution space” as a conceptual tool for the joint negotiation of problem identification. The case illuminates how NICs operationalize a social reorganization of research and development in education. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-85d85fcfb33743a1b3b0410f686464f2 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2001-7480 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | Stockholm University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Designs for Learning |
| spelling | doaj-art-85d85fcfb33743a1b3b0410f686464f22025-08-20T02:13:07ZengStockholm University PressDesigns for Learning2001-74802022-05-0114158–7158–7110.16993/dfl.186193The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement CommunityJulie Kallio0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1924-1440University of Wisconsin – MadisonIn this paper, I present a design case of the problem-identification process prior to the initiation of a Networked Improvement Community (NIC). A NIC is a type of research-practice partnership (RPP) that brings together researchers and practitioners to tackle complex problems of practice, and in doing so, proposes a social reorganization of the traditional education change processes. Central to initiating a NIC, and RPPs more broadly, is the identification of a common problem of practice, but this step often takes place before research on a partnership begins. To investigate how a problem of practice is identified, I use the case of PiPNIC, the Personalization in Practice – Networked Improvement Community, in which a team of university-based researchers used participatory design methods to identify a common problem of practice that would ultimately bring together educators from five schools to participate in the NIC. In the case, I show how the research team constructed a rich problem-solution space and identified a different problem of practice than the research team initially conceived. The problem-identification process, I therefore argue, should be included as a critical component of the NIC initiation framework, and I suggest the “problem-solution space” as a conceptual tool for the joint negotiation of problem identification. The case illuminates how NICs operationalize a social reorganization of research and development in education.https://account.designsforlearning.nu/index.php/su-j-dl/article/view/186participatory designresearch-practice partnershipsproblem identification |
| spellingShingle | Julie Kallio The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community Designs for Learning participatory design research-practice partnerships problem identification |
| title | The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community |
| title_full | The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community |
| title_fullStr | The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community |
| title_short | The Problem-identification Process Prior to the Initiation of a Networked Improvement Community |
| title_sort | problem identification process prior to the initiation of a networked improvement community |
| topic | participatory design research-practice partnerships problem identification |
| url | https://account.designsforlearning.nu/index.php/su-j-dl/article/view/186 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT juliekallio theproblemidentificationprocesspriortotheinitiationofanetworkedimprovementcommunity AT juliekallio problemidentificationprocesspriortotheinitiationofanetworkedimprovementcommunity |