A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024
ObjectiveHere, bibliometric and visual analytical techniques were employed to assess the key features of the 100 most cited publications concerning corticospinal tract (CST) regeneration.MethodsResearch was conducted within the Web of Science Core Collection to pinpoint the 100 most cited publicatio...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1509850/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832583537609408512 |
|---|---|
| author | Saijilafu Saijilafu Ling-Chen Ye Huanyi Li Haokun Li Xinyi Lin Kehui Hu Zekai Huang Chimedragchaa Chimedtseren Linjun Fang Saijilahu Ren-Jie Xu |
| author_facet | Saijilafu Saijilafu Ling-Chen Ye Huanyi Li Haokun Li Xinyi Lin Kehui Hu Zekai Huang Chimedragchaa Chimedtseren Linjun Fang Saijilahu Ren-Jie Xu |
| author_sort | Saijilafu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ObjectiveHere, bibliometric and visual analytical techniques were employed to assess the key features of the 100 most cited publications concerning corticospinal tract (CST) regeneration.MethodsResearch was conducted within the Web of Science Core Collection to pinpoint the 100 most cited publications on CST regeneration. From these, comprehensive data encompassing titles, authorship, key terms, publication venues, release timelines, geographic origins, and institutional affiliations were extracted, followed by an in-depth bibliometric examination.ResultsThe 100 most cited publications were all published between 2004 and 2024. These seminal papers amassed an aggregate of 18,321 citations, with individual citation counts ranging from 83 to 871 and a median of 136 citations per paper. Schwab M. E., stood out as the most prominent contributor, with significant authorship in 9 of the 100 papers. The United States dominated the geographical distribution, accounting for 49 of the articles. With 17 publications, the University of California System led the institutional rankings. A thorough keyword analysis revealed pivotal themes in the field, encompassing the optic nerve, gene expression, CST integrity and regeneration, diffusion tensor imaging, myelin-associated glycoproteins, inhibitors of neurite outgrowth, and methods of electrical and intracortical microstimulation.ConclusionThis investigation provides a bibliometric analysis of CST regeneration, underscoring the significant contribution of the United States to this field. Our findings unveiled the dynamics and trends within the field of CST regeneration, providing a scientific foundation for advancing clinical applications. Building on this analysis, the clinical application of CST regeneration should be optimized through interdisciplinary collaboration, enabling the exploration and validation of a variety of therapeutic approaches, including the use of neurotrophic factors, stem cell therapies, biomaterials, and electrical stimulation. Concurrently, additional clinical trials are necessary to test the safety and efficacy of these therapeutic methods and develop assessment tools for monitoring the recovery of patients. Furthermore, rehabilitation strategies should be refined, and professional education and training should be provided to enhance the understanding of CST regeneration treatments among both medical professionals and patients. The implementation of these strategies promises to enhance therapeutic outcomes and the quality of life of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-85d4625475c3487e8914e8e126154531 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1662-453X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
| spelling | doaj-art-85d4625475c3487e8914e8e1261545312025-01-28T11:37:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2025-01-011810.3389/fnins.2024.15098501509850A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 Saijilafu0 Saijilafu1Ling-Chen Ye2Huanyi Li3Haokun Li4Xinyi Lin5Kehui Hu6Zekai Huang7Chimedragchaa Chimedtseren8Linjun Fang9 Saijilahu10Ren-Jie Xu11Hangzhou Lin’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Novel Targets and Drug Study for Neural Repair of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Novel Targets and Drug Study for Neural Repair of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Novel Targets and Drug Study for Neural Repair of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Novel Targets and Drug Study for Neural Repair of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Novel Targets and Drug Study for Neural Repair of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaKey Laboratory of Novel Targets and Drug Study for Neural Repair of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaInstitute of Traditional Medicine and Technology of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar City, MongoliaHangzhou Lin’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, ChinaTongliao Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Tongliao, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, ChinaObjectiveHere, bibliometric and visual analytical techniques were employed to assess the key features of the 100 most cited publications concerning corticospinal tract (CST) regeneration.MethodsResearch was conducted within the Web of Science Core Collection to pinpoint the 100 most cited publications on CST regeneration. From these, comprehensive data encompassing titles, authorship, key terms, publication venues, release timelines, geographic origins, and institutional affiliations were extracted, followed by an in-depth bibliometric examination.ResultsThe 100 most cited publications were all published between 2004 and 2024. These seminal papers amassed an aggregate of 18,321 citations, with individual citation counts ranging from 83 to 871 and a median of 136 citations per paper. Schwab M. E., stood out as the most prominent contributor, with significant authorship in 9 of the 100 papers. The United States dominated the geographical distribution, accounting for 49 of the articles. With 17 publications, the University of California System led the institutional rankings. A thorough keyword analysis revealed pivotal themes in the field, encompassing the optic nerve, gene expression, CST integrity and regeneration, diffusion tensor imaging, myelin-associated glycoproteins, inhibitors of neurite outgrowth, and methods of electrical and intracortical microstimulation.ConclusionThis investigation provides a bibliometric analysis of CST regeneration, underscoring the significant contribution of the United States to this field. Our findings unveiled the dynamics and trends within the field of CST regeneration, providing a scientific foundation for advancing clinical applications. Building on this analysis, the clinical application of CST regeneration should be optimized through interdisciplinary collaboration, enabling the exploration and validation of a variety of therapeutic approaches, including the use of neurotrophic factors, stem cell therapies, biomaterials, and electrical stimulation. Concurrently, additional clinical trials are necessary to test the safety and efficacy of these therapeutic methods and develop assessment tools for monitoring the recovery of patients. Furthermore, rehabilitation strategies should be refined, and professional education and training should be provided to enhance the understanding of CST regeneration treatments among both medical professionals and patients. The implementation of these strategies promises to enhance therapeutic outcomes and the quality of life of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1509850/fullcorticospinal tract regenerationbibliometric analysisWeb of Science Core CollectionVOSviewerCiteSpace |
| spellingShingle | Saijilafu Saijilafu Ling-Chen Ye Huanyi Li Haokun Li Xinyi Lin Kehui Hu Zekai Huang Chimedragchaa Chimedtseren Linjun Fang Saijilahu Ren-Jie Xu A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 Frontiers in Neuroscience corticospinal tract regeneration bibliometric analysis Web of Science Core Collection VOSviewer CiteSpace |
| title | A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 |
| title_full | A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 |
| title_fullStr | A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 |
| title_full_unstemmed | A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 |
| title_short | A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 |
| title_sort | bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited articles on corticospinal tract regeneration from 2004 to 2024 |
| topic | corticospinal tract regeneration bibliometric analysis Web of Science Core Collection VOSviewer CiteSpace |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1509850/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT saijilafu abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT saijilafu abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT lingchenye abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT huanyili abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT haokunli abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT xinyilin abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT kehuihu abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT zekaihuang abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT chimedragchaachimedtseren abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT linjunfang abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT saijilahu abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT renjiexu abibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT saijilafu bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT saijilafu bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT lingchenye bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT huanyili bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT haokunli bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT xinyilin bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT kehuihu bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT zekaihuang bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT chimedragchaachimedtseren bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT linjunfang bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT saijilahu bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 AT renjiexu bibliometricanalysisofthetop100mostcitedarticlesoncorticospinaltractregenerationfrom2004to2024 |