Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis

Introduction This study evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) during deep-regional hyperthermia (HT) in pelvic and lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas.Materials and methods 17 pelvic (45 treatments) and 16 lower-extremity (42 treatments) patients underwent standard regio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Spyridon N. Karkavitsas, Marianne Göger-Neff, Maria Kawula, Kemal Sumser, Benjamin Zilles, Martin Wadepohl, Guillaume Landry, Christopher Kurz, Wolfgang G. Kunz, Olaf Dietrich, Lars H. Lindner, Margarethus M. Paulides
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560903627046912
author Spyridon N. Karkavitsas
Marianne Göger-Neff
Maria Kawula
Kemal Sumser
Benjamin Zilles
Martin Wadepohl
Guillaume Landry
Christopher Kurz
Wolfgang G. Kunz
Olaf Dietrich
Lars H. Lindner
Margarethus M. Paulides
author_facet Spyridon N. Karkavitsas
Marianne Göger-Neff
Maria Kawula
Kemal Sumser
Benjamin Zilles
Martin Wadepohl
Guillaume Landry
Christopher Kurz
Wolfgang G. Kunz
Olaf Dietrich
Lars H. Lindner
Margarethus M. Paulides
author_sort Spyridon N. Karkavitsas
collection DOAJ
description Introduction This study evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) during deep-regional hyperthermia (HT) in pelvic and lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas.Materials and methods 17 pelvic (45 treatments) and 16 lower-extremity (42 treatments) patients underwent standard regional HT and chemotherapy. Pairs of double-echo gradient-echo scans were acquired during the MR protocol 1.4 s apart. For each pair, precision was quantified using phase data from both echoes (‘dual-echo’) or only one (‘single-echo’) in- or excluding body fat pixels in the field drift correction region of interest. The precision of each method was compared to that of the MRT approach using a built-in clinical software tool (SigmaVision). Accuracy was assessed in three lower-extremity patients (six treatments) using interstitial temperature probes. The Jaccard coefficient quantified pretreatment motion; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed its predictability for acceptable precision (<1 °C) during HT.Results Compared to the built-in dual-echo approach, single-echo thermometry improved the mean temporal precision from 1.32 ± 0.40 °C to 1.07 ± 0.34 °C (pelvis) and from 0.99 ± 0.28 °C to 0.76 ± 0.23 °C (lower extremities). With body fat-based field drift correction, single-echo mean accuracy improved from 1.4 °C to 1.0 °C. Pretreatment bulk motion provided excellent precision prediction with an area under the curve of 0.80–0.86 (pelvis) and 0.81–0.83 (lower extremities), compared to gastrointestinal air motion (0.52–0.58).Conclusion Single-echo MRT exhibited better precision than dual-echo MRT. Body fat-based field-drift correction significantly improved MRT accuracy. Pretreatment bulk motion showed improved prediction of acceptable MRT temporal precision over gastrointestinal air motion.
format Article
id doaj-art-85a9921f4260473fa1a5c85f6e724e14
institution Kabale University
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
spelling doaj-art-85a9921f4260473fa1a5c85f6e724e142025-01-03T09:30:27ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572024-12-0141110.1080/02656736.2024.2405105Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvisSpyridon N. Karkavitsas0Marianne Göger-Neff1Maria Kawula2Kemal Sumser3Benjamin Zilles4Martin Wadepohl5Guillaume Landry6Christopher Kurz7Wolfgang G. Kunz8Olaf Dietrich9Lars H. Lindner10Margarethus M. Paulides11Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyCare + Cure lab of the Electromagnetics group (EM4C + C), Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsDepartment of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyDr. Sennewald Medizintechnik GmbH, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, GermanyCare + Cure lab of the Electromagnetics group (EM4C + C), Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsIntroduction This study evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) during deep-regional hyperthermia (HT) in pelvic and lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas.Materials and methods 17 pelvic (45 treatments) and 16 lower-extremity (42 treatments) patients underwent standard regional HT and chemotherapy. Pairs of double-echo gradient-echo scans were acquired during the MR protocol 1.4 s apart. For each pair, precision was quantified using phase data from both echoes (‘dual-echo’) or only one (‘single-echo’) in- or excluding body fat pixels in the field drift correction region of interest. The precision of each method was compared to that of the MRT approach using a built-in clinical software tool (SigmaVision). Accuracy was assessed in three lower-extremity patients (six treatments) using interstitial temperature probes. The Jaccard coefficient quantified pretreatment motion; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed its predictability for acceptable precision (<1 °C) during HT.Results Compared to the built-in dual-echo approach, single-echo thermometry improved the mean temporal precision from 1.32 ± 0.40 °C to 1.07 ± 0.34 °C (pelvis) and from 0.99 ± 0.28 °C to 0.76 ± 0.23 °C (lower extremities). With body fat-based field drift correction, single-echo mean accuracy improved from 1.4 °C to 1.0 °C. Pretreatment bulk motion provided excellent precision prediction with an area under the curve of 0.80–0.86 (pelvis) and 0.81–0.83 (lower extremities), compared to gastrointestinal air motion (0.52–0.58).Conclusion Single-echo MRT exhibited better precision than dual-echo MRT. Body fat-based field-drift correction significantly improved MRT accuracy. Pretreatment bulk motion showed improved prediction of acceptable MRT temporal precision over gastrointestinal air motion.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105MR thermometryPRFSaccuracyprecisionmotion-dependenceautomatic segmentation
spellingShingle Spyridon N. Karkavitsas
Marianne Göger-Neff
Maria Kawula
Kemal Sumser
Benjamin Zilles
Martin Wadepohl
Guillaume Landry
Christopher Kurz
Wolfgang G. Kunz
Olaf Dietrich
Lars H. Lindner
Margarethus M. Paulides
Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis
International Journal of Hyperthermia
MR thermometry
PRFS
accuracy
precision
motion-dependence
automatic segmentation
title Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis
title_full Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis
title_fullStr Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis
title_short Evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during MR-guided hyperthermia treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis
title_sort evaluation of magnetic resonance thermometry performance during mr guided hyperthermia treatment of soft tissue sarcomas in the lower extremities and pelvis
topic MR thermometry
PRFS
accuracy
precision
motion-dependence
automatic segmentation
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2024.2405105
work_keys_str_mv AT spyridonnkarkavitsas evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT mariannegogerneff evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT mariakawula evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT kemalsumser evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT benjaminzilles evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT martinwadepohl evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT guillaumelandry evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT christopherkurz evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT wolfganggkunz evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT olafdietrich evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT larshlindner evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis
AT margarethusmpaulides evaluationofmagneticresonancethermometryperformanceduringmrguidedhyperthermiatreatmentofsofttissuesarcomasinthelowerextremitiesandpelvis