Research priority setting for implementation science and practice: a living systematic review protocol
Abstract Background Research priority setting has the potential to bridge knowledge gaps, optimize resource allocation, foster collaborations, and inform funding directions for implementation science and practice when these priorities are properly acted upon. This systematic review aims to determine...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Junqiang Zhao, Wenjun Chen, Wenhui Bai, Xiaoyan Zhang, Ruixue Hui, Sihan Chen, Guillaume Fontaine, Xiaolin Wei, Ning Zhang, Ian D. Graham |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Systematic Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02786-3 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Setting Priorities for Innovation Policy and Evaluating Their Performance: Evidence from Europe and Lessons for Ukraine
by: Gudrun Rumpf
Published: (2012-09-01) -
News Media Effects on Policy Priorities: A Second-Level Agenda-Setting Analysis of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Projects in Myanmar
by: Zeyar Oo, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Priority setting for biomedical research including Covid-19 in the northeastern part of Iran
by: Rahim Akrami, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01) -
Research priorities for cardiometabolic syndrome in humanitarian settings: A global consensus-based agenda
by: Chaza Akik, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Exploring Experiences and Designing Guidance for Involving and Engaging Children and Young People in James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships
by: Laura Postma, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)