Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education field

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to explore the perceived concept of “going gradeless” among education master’s students and academics within a Hong Kong university. This study aims to explore differing perspectives on “going gradeless” and identify the key potential issues associated with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xinzi Ow Yong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2025-06-01
Series:Higher Education Evaluation and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HEED-09-2024-0041/full/pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849472474921566208
author Xinzi Ow Yong
author_facet Xinzi Ow Yong
author_sort Xinzi Ow Yong
collection DOAJ
description Purpose – The purpose of this research is to explore the perceived concept of “going gradeless” among education master’s students and academics within a Hong Kong university. This study aims to explore differing perspectives on “going gradeless” and identify the key potential issues associated with its implementation in higher education. Design/methodology/approach – The research employed a qualitative method using purposive sampling to select participants for semi-structured focus interviews, and the sample consisted of nine education master’s students and two academics. The data collected from these interviews were systematically analyzed using NVivo software, and the codes were developed into themes within the participants' perceptions of “going gradeless.” Findings – The findings reveal that students and academics view going gradeless differently. Students have mixed feelings about a gradeless system. Most recognize the problems associated with an overemphasis on grades and the potential benefits of going gradeless, and they also express concerns about the personal advantages of recognized credentials, differentiation from peers and resistance to implementation. Conversely, academics call for a change in grading policy, citing the negative impact of grade-driven approaches on learning. However, they also raise concerns about institutional and cultural factors that could pose challenges to a gradeless system. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the underexplored area of gradeless learning in higher education, particularly within Confucian societies. By revealing differing perspectives between students and academics, offering critical considerations for policymakers and educators seeking to reform grading practices and enhance learning outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-855c0784e92c40bd91037c49875e403a
institution Kabale University
issn 2514-5789
2514-5797
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Emerald Publishing
record_format Article
series Higher Education Evaluation and Development
spelling doaj-art-855c0784e92c40bd91037c49875e403a2025-08-20T03:24:32ZengEmerald PublishingHigher Education Evaluation and Development2514-57892514-57972025-06-01191243710.1108/HEED-09-2024-0041Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education fieldXinzi Ow Yong0Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaPurpose – The purpose of this research is to explore the perceived concept of “going gradeless” among education master’s students and academics within a Hong Kong university. This study aims to explore differing perspectives on “going gradeless” and identify the key potential issues associated with its implementation in higher education. Design/methodology/approach – The research employed a qualitative method using purposive sampling to select participants for semi-structured focus interviews, and the sample consisted of nine education master’s students and two academics. The data collected from these interviews were systematically analyzed using NVivo software, and the codes were developed into themes within the participants' perceptions of “going gradeless.” Findings – The findings reveal that students and academics view going gradeless differently. Students have mixed feelings about a gradeless system. Most recognize the problems associated with an overemphasis on grades and the potential benefits of going gradeless, and they also express concerns about the personal advantages of recognized credentials, differentiation from peers and resistance to implementation. Conversely, academics call for a change in grading policy, citing the negative impact of grade-driven approaches on learning. However, they also raise concerns about institutional and cultural factors that could pose challenges to a gradeless system. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the underexplored area of gradeless learning in higher education, particularly within Confucian societies. By revealing differing perspectives between students and academics, offering critical considerations for policymakers and educators seeking to reform grading practices and enhance learning outcomes.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HEED-09-2024-0041/full/pdfGradeless learningGradeless systemHigher education grading policyConfucian societyStudent involvement
spellingShingle Xinzi Ow Yong
Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education field
Higher Education Evaluation and Development
Gradeless learning
Gradeless system
Higher education grading policy
Confucian society
Student involvement
title Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education field
title_full Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education field
title_fullStr Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education field
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education field
title_short Perceptions of “going gradeless” a case study of a master’s programme in the education field
title_sort perceptions of going gradeless a case study of a master s programme in the education field
topic Gradeless learning
Gradeless system
Higher education grading policy
Confucian society
Student involvement
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/HEED-09-2024-0041/full/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xinziowyong perceptionsofgoinggradelessacasestudyofamastersprogrammeintheeducationfield