Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia

Does letter-form constrain errors in peripheral dyslexia? In Hebrew, 5 of the 22 letters have two different letter forms, one is used only when the letter occurs in word-final position, the other form is used in initial and middle positions. Is the information on final-forms encoded in the letter id...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naama Friedmann, Aviah Gvion
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/635634
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850214442433773568
author Naama Friedmann
Aviah Gvion
author_facet Naama Friedmann
Aviah Gvion
author_sort Naama Friedmann
collection DOAJ
description Does letter-form constrain errors in peripheral dyslexia? In Hebrew, 5 of the 22 letters have two different letter forms, one is used only when the letter occurs in word-final position, the other form is used in initial and middle positions. Is the information on final-forms encoded in the letter identity information and used for word identification, or is it discarded? The current research explored this question through the effect of final vs. non final letter form on the error pattern in neglect dyslexia (neglexia) and letter position dyslexia (LPD). Left word-based neglexia results in errors of omission, substitution and addition of letters in the left side of words, which in Hebrew is the end of the word. We examined whether final letter form blocks the addition of letters to the end of the word and whether omissions of letters after letters in non-final form are avoided. The predominant error type in LPD is migration of letters within words. We tested whether migrations also occur when they cause form change of either final-form letters that move to middle position or middle-form letters that move to final position. These questions were assessed in both acquired and developmental neglexia and LPD. The results indicated a strong effect of final letter-form on acquired neglexia and on acquired and developmental LPD, which almost completely prevented form-changing errors. This effect was not found in developmental neglexia, where words that end in final-form letters were actually more impaired than other words, probably because final-form letters appear only on the neglected side of the word for Hebrew-reading children with left developmental neglexia. These data show that early visuo-orthographic analysis is sensitive to final letter form and that final letter form constrains errors in peripheral dyslexia.
format Article
id doaj-art-85557879fc534217b3baf0eb2a7dc1b3
institution OA Journals
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
language English
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Behavioural Neurology
spelling doaj-art-85557879fc534217b3baf0eb2a7dc1b32025-08-20T02:08:54ZengWileyBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85842005-01-01162-314515810.1155/2005/635634Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position DyslexiaNaama Friedmann0Aviah Gvion1Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelTel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelDoes letter-form constrain errors in peripheral dyslexia? In Hebrew, 5 of the 22 letters have two different letter forms, one is used only when the letter occurs in word-final position, the other form is used in initial and middle positions. Is the information on final-forms encoded in the letter identity information and used for word identification, or is it discarded? The current research explored this question through the effect of final vs. non final letter form on the error pattern in neglect dyslexia (neglexia) and letter position dyslexia (LPD). Left word-based neglexia results in errors of omission, substitution and addition of letters in the left side of words, which in Hebrew is the end of the word. We examined whether final letter form blocks the addition of letters to the end of the word and whether omissions of letters after letters in non-final form are avoided. The predominant error type in LPD is migration of letters within words. We tested whether migrations also occur when they cause form change of either final-form letters that move to middle position or middle-form letters that move to final position. These questions were assessed in both acquired and developmental neglexia and LPD. The results indicated a strong effect of final letter-form on acquired neglexia and on acquired and developmental LPD, which almost completely prevented form-changing errors. This effect was not found in developmental neglexia, where words that end in final-form letters were actually more impaired than other words, probably because final-form letters appear only on the neglected side of the word for Hebrew-reading children with left developmental neglexia. These data show that early visuo-orthographic analysis is sensitive to final letter form and that final letter form constrains errors in peripheral dyslexia.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/635634
spellingShingle Naama Friedmann
Aviah Gvion
Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia
Behavioural Neurology
title Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia
title_full Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia
title_fullStr Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia
title_full_unstemmed Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia
title_short Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia
title_sort letter form as a constraint for errors in neglect dyslexia and letter position dyslexia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/635634
work_keys_str_mv AT naamafriedmann letterformasaconstraintforerrorsinneglectdyslexiaandletterpositiondyslexia
AT aviahgvion letterformasaconstraintforerrorsinneglectdyslexiaandletterpositiondyslexia