Commentary: Why should we classify damage control in cardiac surgery?Central Message
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Rune Haaverstad, MD, PhD, Solveig Moss Kolseth, MD, PhD, Vegard S. Ellensen, MD, PhD |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | JTCVS Techniques |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250721006933 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Commentary: We are in the same minimally invasive boat, and we have to row in the same directionCentral Message
by: Luca Bertolaccini, MD, PhD, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Commentary: We must constantly look at things in different waysCentral Message
by: Luca Bertolaccini, MD, PhD, FCCP, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Prophylactic routine posterior pericardiotomy: Should we perform it in every patient?Central Message
by: Vasily I. Kaleda, MD, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Commentary: Squeezing cardiac surgery into the damage control rubricCentral Message
by: John A. Elefteriades, MD, PhD (Hon), et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Commentary: How do we deal with a freak of nature?Central Message
by: Michele Di Mauro, MD, PhD, MSc Biostat, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)