Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method

The present work addresses a comprehensive compression characterization of Polylactic Acid (PLA) parts produced through the material extrusion (MEX) process, focusing on large strain ranges (0–80 %). Additionally, an optimization study of the infill pattern (IP) was conducted using the Multiple-Crit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristina Vălean, Emanoil Linul, Dipen Kumar Rajak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Results in Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025000246
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841545917933551616
author Cristina Vălean
Emanoil Linul
Dipen Kumar Rajak
author_facet Cristina Vălean
Emanoil Linul
Dipen Kumar Rajak
author_sort Cristina Vălean
collection DOAJ
description The present work addresses a comprehensive compression characterization of Polylactic Acid (PLA) parts produced through the material extrusion (MEX) process, focusing on large strain ranges (0–80 %). Additionally, an optimization study of the infill pattern (IP) was conducted using the Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method. The study showed that the compressive behavior of the examined parts is similar to cellular materials (e.g., foams) and varies based on the IP, exhibiting brittle, quasi-brittle, or ductile fracture modes. The highest compressive modulus (745.35 MPa) and compressive strength (33.95 MPa) were observed for the Hilbert Curve IP, while the lowest values were recorded for the Lightning IP. Honeycomb IP presented the best energy absorption performance (16.65 MJ/m3), whereas Lightning IP had the lowest (0.14 MJ/m3). In terms of specific properties, Star IP was found as the most efficient, owing to its lightweight design, outperforming other IPs. Considering conventional and specific compressive properties through the MCDA method, Star IP was identified as the optimal pattern across three key criteria: “stiffness-driven”, “strength-driven”, and “energy absorption-driven” structures. Lightning IP exhibited the shortest printing time and lightest weight, whereas Honeycomb IP exhibited the maximum time and weight. Finally, the dimensional accuracy of all MEX-printed specimens was exceptionally high, with dimensional relative errors below 0.15 %.
format Article
id doaj-art-851ae3f7436f41b2b961e8cf3a43f6a5
institution Kabale University
issn 2590-1230
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Results in Engineering
spelling doaj-art-851ae3f7436f41b2b961e8cf3a43f6a52025-01-11T06:41:54ZengElsevierResults in Engineering2590-12302025-03-0125103936Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis methodCristina Vălean0Emanoil Linul1Dipen Kumar Rajak2Department of Mechanics and Strength of Materials, Politehnica University Timisoara, 1 Mihai Viteazu Avenue, 300 222 Timisoara, Romania; Research Institute for Renewable Energies, Politehnica University Timisoara, 138 Musicescu Gavril Street, Timisoara 300 774, RomaniaDepartment of Mechanics and Strength of Materials, Politehnica University Timisoara, 1 Mihai Viteazu Avenue, 300 222 Timisoara, Romania; Corresponding author.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, UP, India; CSIR-Advanced Materials and Processes Research Institute, Bhopal 462026, MP, IndiaThe present work addresses a comprehensive compression characterization of Polylactic Acid (PLA) parts produced through the material extrusion (MEX) process, focusing on large strain ranges (0–80 %). Additionally, an optimization study of the infill pattern (IP) was conducted using the Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method. The study showed that the compressive behavior of the examined parts is similar to cellular materials (e.g., foams) and varies based on the IP, exhibiting brittle, quasi-brittle, or ductile fracture modes. The highest compressive modulus (745.35 MPa) and compressive strength (33.95 MPa) were observed for the Hilbert Curve IP, while the lowest values were recorded for the Lightning IP. Honeycomb IP presented the best energy absorption performance (16.65 MJ/m3), whereas Lightning IP had the lowest (0.14 MJ/m3). In terms of specific properties, Star IP was found as the most efficient, owing to its lightweight design, outperforming other IPs. Considering conventional and specific compressive properties through the MCDA method, Star IP was identified as the optimal pattern across three key criteria: “stiffness-driven”, “strength-driven”, and “energy absorption-driven” structures. Lightning IP exhibited the shortest printing time and lightest weight, whereas Honeycomb IP exhibited the maximum time and weight. Finally, the dimensional accuracy of all MEX-printed specimens was exceptionally high, with dimensional relative errors below 0.15 %.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025000246Material extrusionInfill patternPolylactic acidCompressive propertiesOptimization
spellingShingle Cristina Vălean
Emanoil Linul
Dipen Kumar Rajak
Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method
Results in Engineering
Material extrusion
Infill pattern
Polylactic acid
Compressive properties
Optimization
title Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method
title_full Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method
title_fullStr Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method
title_full_unstemmed Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method
title_short Compressive performance of 3D-printed lightweight structures: Infill pattern optimization via Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis method
title_sort compressive performance of 3d printed lightweight structures infill pattern optimization via multiple criteria decision analysis method
topic Material extrusion
Infill pattern
Polylactic acid
Compressive properties
Optimization
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025000246
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinavalean compressiveperformanceof3dprintedlightweightstructuresinfillpatternoptimizationviamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismethod
AT emanoillinul compressiveperformanceof3dprintedlightweightstructuresinfillpatternoptimizationviamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismethod
AT dipenkumarrajak compressiveperformanceof3dprintedlightweightstructuresinfillpatternoptimizationviamultiplecriteriadecisionanalysismethod