Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets

INTRODUCTION. Over the past decades, there has been significant growth in adhesive technologies for fixed orthodontic appliances. Developments in adhesive systems have focused on simplified methods of use, improved composition and high bonding ability to tooth structure.AIM. The aim of this study is to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Almokaddam, N. S. Tuturov, I. Katbeh, A. Saleh
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: LLC "Endo Press" 2024-06-01
Series:Эндодонтия Today
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1319
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849394188549881856
author H. Almokaddam
N. S. Tuturov
I. Katbeh
A. Saleh
author_facet H. Almokaddam
N. S. Tuturov
I. Katbeh
A. Saleh
author_sort H. Almokaddam
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION. Over the past decades, there has been significant growth in adhesive technologies for fixed orthodontic appliances. Developments in adhesive systems have focused on simplified methods of use, improved composition and high bonding ability to tooth structure.AIM. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of a 5th generation adhesive system and a universal adhesive system in two etching techniques for fixation of metal brackets.MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study consisted sample of 30 removed human upper premolars. The teeth were randomly distributed into three groups, 10 in each group. In the group 1, the Transbond XT adhesive system (3M Unitek) was used, in the group 2 – the universal adhesive Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) in the etching technique, in the group 3 – Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) in the self-etching technique. The study used metal brackets for upper premolars Gemini Bracket MBT (3M Unitek, USA) with a micro-engraved base with an area of 10.61 mm.RESULTS. In group 1, the shear strength value was 21.2 ± 3.2 MPa, in group 2 – 21.6 ± 5.2 MPa, in group 3 – 17.7 ± 6.4 MPa. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups. According to the study, a decrease in the level of adhesive force was found when using a universal adhesive without prior etching of the enamel with phosphoric acid. However, this level remained within the clinically recommended range.CONCLUSIONS. Thus, all studied adhesive systems used in various etching techniques demonstrated high adhesive performance, providing strong adhesion of the orthodontic structure to the tooth surface.
format Article
id doaj-art-850d6c7ee86e49a19708a8fd0dbafee6
institution Kabale University
issn 1683-2981
1726-7242
language Russian
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher LLC "Endo Press"
record_format Article
series Эндодонтия Today
spelling doaj-art-850d6c7ee86e49a19708a8fd0dbafee62025-08-20T03:40:06ZrusLLC "Endo Press"Эндодонтия Today1683-29811726-72422024-06-0122217918510.36377/ET-00201086Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of bracketsH. Almokaddam0N. S. Tuturov1I. Katbeh2A. Saleh3Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice LumumbaPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice LumumbaPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice LumumbaPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice LumumbaINTRODUCTION. Over the past decades, there has been significant growth in adhesive technologies for fixed orthodontic appliances. Developments in adhesive systems have focused on simplified methods of use, improved composition and high bonding ability to tooth structure.AIM. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of a 5th generation adhesive system and a universal adhesive system in two etching techniques for fixation of metal brackets.MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study consisted sample of 30 removed human upper premolars. The teeth were randomly distributed into three groups, 10 in each group. In the group 1, the Transbond XT adhesive system (3M Unitek) was used, in the group 2 – the universal adhesive Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) in the etching technique, in the group 3 – Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) in the self-etching technique. The study used metal brackets for upper premolars Gemini Bracket MBT (3M Unitek, USA) with a micro-engraved base with an area of 10.61 mm.RESULTS. In group 1, the shear strength value was 21.2 ± 3.2 MPa, in group 2 – 21.6 ± 5.2 MPa, in group 3 – 17.7 ± 6.4 MPa. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups. According to the study, a decrease in the level of adhesive force was found when using a universal adhesive without prior etching of the enamel with phosphoric acid. However, this level remained within the clinically recommended range.CONCLUSIONS. Thus, all studied adhesive systems used in various etching techniques demonstrated high adhesive performance, providing strong adhesion of the orthodontic structure to the tooth surface.https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1319orthodontic adhesivebond strengthself-etching adhesive
spellingShingle H. Almokaddam
N. S. Tuturov
I. Katbeh
A. Saleh
Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
Эндодонтия Today
orthodontic adhesive
bond strength
self-etching adhesive
title Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
title_full Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
title_short Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
title_sort comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
topic orthodontic adhesive
bond strength
self-etching adhesive
url https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1319
work_keys_str_mv AT halmokaddam comparativeevaluationoftheshearstrengthoforthodonticadhesivesforfixationofbrackets
AT nstuturov comparativeevaluationoftheshearstrengthoforthodonticadhesivesforfixationofbrackets
AT ikatbeh comparativeevaluationoftheshearstrengthoforthodonticadhesivesforfixationofbrackets
AT asaleh comparativeevaluationoftheshearstrengthoforthodonticadhesivesforfixationofbrackets