Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra
Abstract Artificial light at night poses a global threat to biodiversity and is increasing at a rate greater than any other pollutant. We conducted a field experiment to investigate the effects of short‐term nighttime illumination on nocturnal flying insects and insectivorous bats in previously unli...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Ecosphere |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70291 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849761990736609280 |
|---|---|
| author | Kylie A. Robert Alicia M. Dimovski Peter Contos Nyil Khwaja Stephen R. Griffiths |
| author_facet | Kylie A. Robert Alicia M. Dimovski Peter Contos Nyil Khwaja Stephen R. Griffiths |
| author_sort | Kylie A. Robert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Artificial light at night poses a global threat to biodiversity and is increasing at a rate greater than any other pollutant. We conducted a field experiment to investigate the effects of short‐term nighttime illumination on nocturnal flying insects and insectivorous bats in previously unlit remnant bushland. We compared these organisms' responses to three types of light‐emitting diode (LED) lights, each with a unique spectral composition (cool white [CW], λP 457 nm; filtered white [FW], λP 586 nm; and amber [A], λP 601 nm), as well as a control (C) group without illumination. Our findings revealed that both CW and FW LEDs significantly increased the total activity of flying insects, particularly the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera. By contrast, total bat activity was independent of light treatment, but there was a marginally non‐significant effect on bats presumed to be light sensitive. Amber lights appear to mitigate the disruptive effects of light on at least one light sensitive bat species. Intriguingly, despite a positive association in one bat species with insect abundance, there was no corresponding increase in feeding activity around illuminated sites in this or any other species. These observations suggest that bats may not solely exploit the attraction of insects to LED lights as a feeding resource and that those species that persist in these environments are perhaps more light tolerant than light exploitive. Overall, our study highlights potentially complex responses of Australian insectivorous bats and flying insects to short‐term LED lighting and contributes further insights into the ecological consequences of nighttime lighting. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-84e7ba4cf6f84fcbad2d28b0baef2017 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2150-8925 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecosphere |
| spelling | doaj-art-84e7ba4cf6f84fcbad2d28b0baef20172025-08-20T03:05:52ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252025-05-01165n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70291Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectraKylie A. Robert0Alicia M. Dimovski1Peter Contos2Nyil Khwaja3Stephen R. Griffiths4School of Agriculture, Biomedicine & Environment, La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria AustraliaSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine & Environment, La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria AustraliaSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine & Environment, La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria AustraliaDepartment of Energy, Environment & Climate Action Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Heidelberg Victoria AustraliaSchool of Agriculture, Biomedicine & Environment, La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria AustraliaAbstract Artificial light at night poses a global threat to biodiversity and is increasing at a rate greater than any other pollutant. We conducted a field experiment to investigate the effects of short‐term nighttime illumination on nocturnal flying insects and insectivorous bats in previously unlit remnant bushland. We compared these organisms' responses to three types of light‐emitting diode (LED) lights, each with a unique spectral composition (cool white [CW], λP 457 nm; filtered white [FW], λP 586 nm; and amber [A], λP 601 nm), as well as a control (C) group without illumination. Our findings revealed that both CW and FW LEDs significantly increased the total activity of flying insects, particularly the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera. By contrast, total bat activity was independent of light treatment, but there was a marginally non‐significant effect on bats presumed to be light sensitive. Amber lights appear to mitigate the disruptive effects of light on at least one light sensitive bat species. Intriguingly, despite a positive association in one bat species with insect abundance, there was no corresponding increase in feeding activity around illuminated sites in this or any other species. These observations suggest that bats may not solely exploit the attraction of insects to LED lights as a feeding resource and that those species that persist in these environments are perhaps more light tolerant than light exploitive. Overall, our study highlights potentially complex responses of Australian insectivorous bats and flying insects to short‐term LED lighting and contributes further insights into the ecological consequences of nighttime lighting.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70291ALANartificial light at nightbat–insect interactionsChiropteralight pollutionurban ecology |
| spellingShingle | Kylie A. Robert Alicia M. Dimovski Peter Contos Nyil Khwaja Stephen R. Griffiths Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra Ecosphere ALAN artificial light at night bat–insect interactions Chiroptera light pollution urban ecology |
| title | Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra |
| title_full | Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra |
| title_fullStr | Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra |
| title_full_unstemmed | Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra |
| title_short | Divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental LED illumination of different spectra |
| title_sort | divergent responses of insectivorous bats and flying insects to experimental led illumination of different spectra |
| topic | ALAN artificial light at night bat–insect interactions Chiroptera light pollution urban ecology |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70291 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kyliearobert divergentresponsesofinsectivorousbatsandflyinginsectstoexperimentalledilluminationofdifferentspectra AT aliciamdimovski divergentresponsesofinsectivorousbatsandflyinginsectstoexperimentalledilluminationofdifferentspectra AT petercontos divergentresponsesofinsectivorousbatsandflyinginsectstoexperimentalledilluminationofdifferentspectra AT nyilkhwaja divergentresponsesofinsectivorousbatsandflyinginsectstoexperimentalledilluminationofdifferentspectra AT stephenrgriffiths divergentresponsesofinsectivorousbatsandflyinginsectstoexperimentalledilluminationofdifferentspectra |