PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis

Abstract Background Immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has transformed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, yet optimal strategies for elderly patients remain uncertain. Elderly patients (≥ 65 years) exhibit immune senescence (e.g., T-cell dysfunction, chronic inflammation),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunye Mao, An Wang, Xiangwei Ge, Jinzhao Zhai, Yi Hu, Jinliang Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03791-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849767419868872704
author Yunye Mao
An Wang
Xiangwei Ge
Jinzhao Zhai
Yi Hu
Jinliang Wang
author_facet Yunye Mao
An Wang
Xiangwei Ge
Jinzhao Zhai
Yi Hu
Jinliang Wang
author_sort Yunye Mao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has transformed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, yet optimal strategies for elderly patients remain uncertain. Elderly patients (≥ 65 years) exhibit immune senescence (e.g., T-cell dysfunction, chronic inflammation), which may compromise immunotherapy efficacy and amplify toxicity risks, yet direct comparisons of monotherapy versus combination regimens in this population are lacking. Real-world comparisons of monotherapy versus combination therapy in this vulnerable group are lacking, hindering personalized clinical decisions. Objective This real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy versus combination therapy with chemotherapy in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with advanced NSCLC and develop a prognostic nomogram to guide personalized treatment decisions. Methods In this multicenter retrospective study, 641 patients (149 monotherapy, 492 combination therapy) with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were analyzed. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). A nomogram incorporating clinical variables was constructed using LASSO-Cox regression. Results In a retrospective analysis of 641 elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with advanced NSCLC, combination therapy (n = 492) demonstrated superior median OS compared to monotherapy (n = 149) (35.37 vs. 20.53 months; HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.48–0.80, P < 0.001), though PFS did not differ significantly (11.87 vs. 10.67 months; HR = 0.94, P = 0.535). Age-stratified analysis revealed marked OS benefits for patients < 75 years receiving combination therapy (36.10 vs. 18.67 months, P < 0.001), whereas no advantage was observed in those ≥ 75 years (29.23 vs. 34.93 months, P = 0.645). Cox regression identified combination therapy as a protective factor (HR = 0.54, P < 0.001), while ECOG PS ≥ 2 (HR = 1.87, P = 0.002), liver metastasis (HR = 1.62, P = 0.013), bone metastasis (HR = 1.84, P < 0.001), and malignant pleural effusion (HR = 1.64, P < 0.001) independently worsened prognosis. The incidence of AEs of any-grade (P < 0.001) and grade 3–4 (P = 0.003) in the immunotherapy combination group was significantly higher than that in the immunotherapy monotherapy group. A prognostic nomogram integrating treatment type, ECOG PS score, and other six variables had an AUC value of 0.70–0.71 for predicting 1–2 year OS. Conclusions For elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, immune combination therapy improved median OS over monotherapy. It was safe and effective, suggesting a viable treatment option, though further evaluation is needed for those aged 75 and older. A prognostic nomogram for OS following immunotherapy was developed, showing superior accuracy.
format Article
id doaj-art-84a9d0e47fee4f9a83eb2f23dd449a3b
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2466
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
spelling doaj-art-84a9d0e47fee4f9a83eb2f23dd449a3b2025-08-20T03:04:12ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662025-07-0125111510.1186/s12890-025-03791-xPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosisYunye Mao0An Wang1Xiangwei Ge2Jinzhao Zhai3Yi Hu4Jinliang Wang5Senior Department of Oncology, the, Fifth Medical Center , PLA General HospitalSenior Department of Oncology, the, Fifth Medical Center , PLA General HospitalSenior Department of Oncology, the, Fifth Medical Center , PLA General HospitalSenior Department of Oncology, the, Fifth Medical Center , PLA General HospitalSenior Department of Oncology, the, Fifth Medical Center , PLA General HospitalSenior Department of Oncology, the, Fifth Medical Center , PLA General HospitalAbstract Background Immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has transformed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, yet optimal strategies for elderly patients remain uncertain. Elderly patients (≥ 65 years) exhibit immune senescence (e.g., T-cell dysfunction, chronic inflammation), which may compromise immunotherapy efficacy and amplify toxicity risks, yet direct comparisons of monotherapy versus combination regimens in this population are lacking. Real-world comparisons of monotherapy versus combination therapy in this vulnerable group are lacking, hindering personalized clinical decisions. Objective This real-world study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy versus combination therapy with chemotherapy in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with advanced NSCLC and develop a prognostic nomogram to guide personalized treatment decisions. Methods In this multicenter retrospective study, 641 patients (149 monotherapy, 492 combination therapy) with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were analyzed. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). A nomogram incorporating clinical variables was constructed using LASSO-Cox regression. Results In a retrospective analysis of 641 elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with advanced NSCLC, combination therapy (n = 492) demonstrated superior median OS compared to monotherapy (n = 149) (35.37 vs. 20.53 months; HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.48–0.80, P < 0.001), though PFS did not differ significantly (11.87 vs. 10.67 months; HR = 0.94, P = 0.535). Age-stratified analysis revealed marked OS benefits for patients < 75 years receiving combination therapy (36.10 vs. 18.67 months, P < 0.001), whereas no advantage was observed in those ≥ 75 years (29.23 vs. 34.93 months, P = 0.645). Cox regression identified combination therapy as a protective factor (HR = 0.54, P < 0.001), while ECOG PS ≥ 2 (HR = 1.87, P = 0.002), liver metastasis (HR = 1.62, P = 0.013), bone metastasis (HR = 1.84, P < 0.001), and malignant pleural effusion (HR = 1.64, P < 0.001) independently worsened prognosis. The incidence of AEs of any-grade (P < 0.001) and grade 3–4 (P = 0.003) in the immunotherapy combination group was significantly higher than that in the immunotherapy monotherapy group. A prognostic nomogram integrating treatment type, ECOG PS score, and other six variables had an AUC value of 0.70–0.71 for predicting 1–2 year OS. Conclusions For elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, immune combination therapy improved median OS over monotherapy. It was safe and effective, suggesting a viable treatment option, though further evaluation is needed for those aged 75 and older. A prognostic nomogram for OS following immunotherapy was developed, showing superior accuracy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03791-xElderly patientsAdvanced non-small cell lung cancerImmunotherapyImmune combination therapy
spellingShingle Yunye Mao
An Wang
Xiangwei Ge
Jinzhao Zhai
Yi Hu
Jinliang Wang
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Elderly patients
Advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Immunotherapy
Immune combination therapy
title PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis
title_full PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis
title_fullStr PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis
title_full_unstemmed PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis
title_short PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis
title_sort pd 1 pd l1 inhibitors monotherapy vs combination therapy in elderly advanced nsclc a real world study and nomogram for survival prognosis
topic Elderly patients
Advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Immunotherapy
Immune combination therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03791-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yunyemao pd1pdl1inhibitorsmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyinelderlyadvancednsclcarealworldstudyandnomogramforsurvivalprognosis
AT anwang pd1pdl1inhibitorsmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyinelderlyadvancednsclcarealworldstudyandnomogramforsurvivalprognosis
AT xiangweige pd1pdl1inhibitorsmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyinelderlyadvancednsclcarealworldstudyandnomogramforsurvivalprognosis
AT jinzhaozhai pd1pdl1inhibitorsmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyinelderlyadvancednsclcarealworldstudyandnomogramforsurvivalprognosis
AT yihu pd1pdl1inhibitorsmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyinelderlyadvancednsclcarealworldstudyandnomogramforsurvivalprognosis
AT jinliangwang pd1pdl1inhibitorsmonotherapyvscombinationtherapyinelderlyadvancednsclcarealworldstudyandnomogramforsurvivalprognosis