The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with retinal vein occlusion secondary to macular edema (RVO-ME). Materials and Methods. Relevant databases were searched to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li Xiaodong, Xie Xuejun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4007002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561855239815168
author Li Xiaodong
Xie Xuejun
author_facet Li Xiaodong
Xie Xuejun
author_sort Li Xiaodong
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with retinal vein occlusion secondary to macular edema (RVO-ME). Materials and Methods. Relevant databases were searched to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating DEX for DME and RVO-ME. The search was conducted until March 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.4.1 software after screening the literature by inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting information, and evaluating the methodological quality of the included studies. Results. The study showed that DEX treatment of RVO-ME was associated with an improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (MD = −9.08, 95% CI: −10.89–7.27, P<0.00001) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (MD = 93.47, 95% CI: 28.55–159.39, P=0.005). DEX treatment of DME was significantly better than anti-VEGF treatment in terms of CRT reduction (MD = −72.35, 95% CI: −115.0–29.69, P=0.0009). The safety study showed that the risk of cataract from RVO-ME (OR = 5.06, 95% CI: 1.96 to 13.06, P=0.0008) and the incidence of high intraocular pressure (OR = 6.67, 95% CI: 3.46 to 12.86, P<0.00001) were significantly higher with DEX than with anti-VEGF therapy. The risk of cataract from DME (OR = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.10 to 10.54, P=0.00022) was significantly higher with DEX than with anti-VEGF therapy (OR = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.10 to 10.54, P=0.0002). The incidence of high IOP (OR = 13.77, 95% CI: 4.96 to 38.18, P<0.00001) was significantly higher with DEX than with anti-VEGF therapy. Conclusions. In patients with DME and RVO-ME, DEX was more efficacious but slightly less safe than anti-VEGF therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-846f25fff41c41958a057f3bbce8f618
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-846f25fff41c41958a057f3bbce8f6182025-02-03T01:24:09ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-00582022-01-01202210.1155/2022/4007002The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsLi Xiaodong0Xie Xuejun1Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineDepartment of OphthalmologyPurpose. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with retinal vein occlusion secondary to macular edema (RVO-ME). Materials and Methods. Relevant databases were searched to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating DEX for DME and RVO-ME. The search was conducted until March 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.4.1 software after screening the literature by inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting information, and evaluating the methodological quality of the included studies. Results. The study showed that DEX treatment of RVO-ME was associated with an improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (MD = −9.08, 95% CI: −10.89–7.27, P<0.00001) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (MD = 93.47, 95% CI: 28.55–159.39, P=0.005). DEX treatment of DME was significantly better than anti-VEGF treatment in terms of CRT reduction (MD = −72.35, 95% CI: −115.0–29.69, P=0.0009). The safety study showed that the risk of cataract from RVO-ME (OR = 5.06, 95% CI: 1.96 to 13.06, P=0.0008) and the incidence of high intraocular pressure (OR = 6.67, 95% CI: 3.46 to 12.86, P<0.00001) were significantly higher with DEX than with anti-VEGF therapy. The risk of cataract from DME (OR = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.10 to 10.54, P=0.00022) was significantly higher with DEX than with anti-VEGF therapy (OR = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.10 to 10.54, P=0.0002). The incidence of high IOP (OR = 13.77, 95% CI: 4.96 to 38.18, P<0.00001) was significantly higher with DEX than with anti-VEGF therapy. Conclusions. In patients with DME and RVO-ME, DEX was more efficacious but slightly less safe than anti-VEGF therapy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4007002
spellingShingle Li Xiaodong
Xie Xuejun
The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Journal of Ophthalmology
title The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema and Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for diabetic macular edema and macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4007002
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaodong theefficacyandsafetyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaandmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiexuejun theefficacyandsafetyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaandmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lixiaodong efficacyandsafetyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaandmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiexuejun efficacyandsafetyofdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantfordiabeticmacularedemaandmacularedemasecondarytoretinalveinocclusionametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials