Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in Africa. Receptor-defined subtypes are a major determinant of treatment options and disease outcomes but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the frequency of poor prognosis estrogen receptor (ER) negative subtype...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Eng, Valerie McCormack, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-09-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001720
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849411945418981376
author Amanda Eng
Valerie McCormack
Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
author_facet Amanda Eng
Valerie McCormack
Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
author_sort Amanda Eng
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in Africa. Receptor-defined subtypes are a major determinant of treatment options and disease outcomes but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the frequency of poor prognosis estrogen receptor (ER) negative subtypes in Africa. We systematically reviewed publications reporting on the frequency of breast cancer receptor-defined subtypes in indigenous populations in Africa.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Medline, Embase, and Global Health were searched for studies published between 1st January 1980 and 15th April 2014. Reported proportions of ER positive (ER+), progesterone receptor positive (PR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) disease were extracted and 95% CI calculated. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool estimates. Fifty-four studies from North Africa (n=12,284 women with breast cancer) and 26 from sub-Saharan Africa (n=4,737) were eligible. There was marked between-study heterogeneity in the ER+ estimates in both regions (I2>90%), with the majority reporting proportions between 0.40 and 0.80 in North Africa and between 0.20 and 0.70 in sub-Saharan Africa. Similarly, large between-study heterogeneity was observed for PR+ and HER2+ estimates (I2>80%, in all instances). Meta-regression analyses showed that the proportion of ER+ disease was 10% (4%-17%) lower for studies based on archived tumor blocks rather than prospectively collected specimens, and 9% (2%-17%) lower for those with ≥ 40% versus those with <40% grade 3 tumors. For prospectively collected samples, the pooled proportions for ER+ and triple negative tumors were 0.59 (0.56-0.62) and 0.21 (0.17-0.25), respectively, regardless of region. Limitations of the study include the lack of standardized procedures across the various studies; the low methodological quality of many studies in terms of the representativeness of their case series and the quality of the procedures for collection, fixation, and receptor testing; and the possibility that women with breast cancer may have contributed to more than one study.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The published data from the more appropriate prospectively measured specimens are consistent with the majority of breast cancers in Africa being ER+. As no single subtype dominates in the continent availability of receptor testing should be a priority, especially for young women with early stage disease where appropriate receptor-specific treatment modalities offer the greatest potential for reducing years of life lost. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
format Article
id doaj-art-842c4feb3d6d4bba8cadf07f2d0931dc
institution Kabale University
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language English
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Medicine
spelling doaj-art-842c4feb3d6d4bba8cadf07f2d0931dc2025-08-20T03:34:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762014-09-01119e100172010.1371/journal.pmed.1001720Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Amanda EngValerie McCormackIsabel dos-Santos-Silva<h4>Background</h4>Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in Africa. Receptor-defined subtypes are a major determinant of treatment options and disease outcomes but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the frequency of poor prognosis estrogen receptor (ER) negative subtypes in Africa. We systematically reviewed publications reporting on the frequency of breast cancer receptor-defined subtypes in indigenous populations in Africa.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Medline, Embase, and Global Health were searched for studies published between 1st January 1980 and 15th April 2014. Reported proportions of ER positive (ER+), progesterone receptor positive (PR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) disease were extracted and 95% CI calculated. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool estimates. Fifty-four studies from North Africa (n=12,284 women with breast cancer) and 26 from sub-Saharan Africa (n=4,737) were eligible. There was marked between-study heterogeneity in the ER+ estimates in both regions (I2>90%), with the majority reporting proportions between 0.40 and 0.80 in North Africa and between 0.20 and 0.70 in sub-Saharan Africa. Similarly, large between-study heterogeneity was observed for PR+ and HER2+ estimates (I2>80%, in all instances). Meta-regression analyses showed that the proportion of ER+ disease was 10% (4%-17%) lower for studies based on archived tumor blocks rather than prospectively collected specimens, and 9% (2%-17%) lower for those with ≥ 40% versus those with <40% grade 3 tumors. For prospectively collected samples, the pooled proportions for ER+ and triple negative tumors were 0.59 (0.56-0.62) and 0.21 (0.17-0.25), respectively, regardless of region. Limitations of the study include the lack of standardized procedures across the various studies; the low methodological quality of many studies in terms of the representativeness of their case series and the quality of the procedures for collection, fixation, and receptor testing; and the possibility that women with breast cancer may have contributed to more than one study.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The published data from the more appropriate prospectively measured specimens are consistent with the majority of breast cancers in Africa being ER+. As no single subtype dominates in the continent availability of receptor testing should be a priority, especially for young women with early stage disease where appropriate receptor-specific treatment modalities offer the greatest potential for reducing years of life lost. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001720
spellingShingle Amanda Eng
Valerie McCormack
Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS Medicine
title Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort receptor defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in africa a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001720
work_keys_str_mv AT amandaeng receptordefinedsubtypesofbreastcancerinindigenouspopulationsinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT valeriemccormack receptordefinedsubtypesofbreastcancerinindigenouspopulationsinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT isabeldossantossilva receptordefinedsubtypesofbreastcancerinindigenouspopulationsinafricaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis