Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania
Background/Objectives: Dental age estimation plays a critical role in pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, and forensic medicine. The Nolla method, widely applied globally, has shown variable accuracy across different populations. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the Noll...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Children |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/1/69 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832588779472289792 |
---|---|
author | Ligia Ioana Moga Abel Emanuel Moca Raluca Iurcov Dan Slăvescu Ligia Luminița Vaida |
author_facet | Ligia Ioana Moga Abel Emanuel Moca Raluca Iurcov Dan Slăvescu Ligia Luminița Vaida |
author_sort | Ligia Ioana Moga |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background/Objectives: Dental age estimation plays a critical role in pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, and forensic medicine. The Nolla method, widely applied globally, has shown variable accuracy across different populations. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the Nolla method in estimating the dental age of Romanian children and to identify potential discrepancies between dental and chronological ages. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 860 panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients aged 3–15.9 years in Oradea, Romania. The Nolla method was applied to estimate dental age, and the results were compared with chronological age. Statistical analyses, including Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U tests, were performed to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of the Nolla method. Results: The study analyzed 860 panoramic radiographs (356 boys and 504 girls). The average chronological age was 9.95 ± 2.48 years, while the average dental age, as estimated using the Nolla method, was 8.43 ± 2.13 years. Dental age was consistently lower than chronological age, with a median difference of 1.5 years (IQR: 0.9–2.2 years). Among the 13 age groups, the highest representation was found in the 8–8.9-year (14.7%) and 9–9.9-year (13.3%) groups. Gender differences were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001); girls demonstrated a larger median discrepancy of 1.7 years (IQR: 1.1–2.3 years) compared to boys at 1.15 years (IQR: 0.6–1.8 years). Notably, discrepancies increased with age, peaking at 2.6 years in the 14–14.9-year group (4.7% of the sample). The youngest group (3–3.9 years) showed the smallest difference of 0.3 years. Significant differences between chronological and dental ages were observed in 87.5% of the sample. Conclusions: The Nolla method consistently underestimated dental age in Romanian children, with greater discrepancies in older age groups and among girls. These findings highlight the need for the population-specific calibration of the method to improve its accuracy in both clinical and forensic contexts. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8402b354725b4fcf90fd8da2c6d539b2 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2227-9067 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Children |
spelling | doaj-art-8402b354725b4fcf90fd8da2c6d539b22025-01-24T13:27:11ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672025-01-011216910.3390/children12010069Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern RomaniaLigia Ioana Moga0Abel Emanuel Moca1Raluca Iurcov2Dan Slăvescu3Ligia Luminița Vaida4Doctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 1 Universității Street, 410087 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaBackground/Objectives: Dental age estimation plays a critical role in pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, and forensic medicine. The Nolla method, widely applied globally, has shown variable accuracy across different populations. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the Nolla method in estimating the dental age of Romanian children and to identify potential discrepancies between dental and chronological ages. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 860 panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients aged 3–15.9 years in Oradea, Romania. The Nolla method was applied to estimate dental age, and the results were compared with chronological age. Statistical analyses, including Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U tests, were performed to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of the Nolla method. Results: The study analyzed 860 panoramic radiographs (356 boys and 504 girls). The average chronological age was 9.95 ± 2.48 years, while the average dental age, as estimated using the Nolla method, was 8.43 ± 2.13 years. Dental age was consistently lower than chronological age, with a median difference of 1.5 years (IQR: 0.9–2.2 years). Among the 13 age groups, the highest representation was found in the 8–8.9-year (14.7%) and 9–9.9-year (13.3%) groups. Gender differences were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001); girls demonstrated a larger median discrepancy of 1.7 years (IQR: 1.1–2.3 years) compared to boys at 1.15 years (IQR: 0.6–1.8 years). Notably, discrepancies increased with age, peaking at 2.6 years in the 14–14.9-year group (4.7% of the sample). The youngest group (3–3.9 years) showed the smallest difference of 0.3 years. Significant differences between chronological and dental ages were observed in 87.5% of the sample. Conclusions: The Nolla method consistently underestimated dental age in Romanian children, with greater discrepancies in older age groups and among girls. These findings highlight the need for the population-specific calibration of the method to improve its accuracy in both clinical and forensic contexts.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/1/69dental ageNolla methodRomania |
spellingShingle | Ligia Ioana Moga Abel Emanuel Moca Raluca Iurcov Dan Slăvescu Ligia Luminița Vaida Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania Children dental age Nolla method Romania |
title | Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania |
title_full | Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania |
title_short | Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania |
title_sort | evaluating the nolla method for dental age estimation in children from northwestern romania |
topic | dental age Nolla method Romania |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/1/69 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ligiaioanamoga evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania AT abelemanuelmoca evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania AT ralucaiurcov evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania AT danslavescu evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania AT ligialuminitavaida evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania |