Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania

Background/Objectives: Dental age estimation plays a critical role in pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, and forensic medicine. The Nolla method, widely applied globally, has shown variable accuracy across different populations. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the Noll...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ligia Ioana Moga, Abel Emanuel Moca, Raluca Iurcov, Dan Slăvescu, Ligia Luminița Vaida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Children
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/1/69
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588779472289792
author Ligia Ioana Moga
Abel Emanuel Moca
Raluca Iurcov
Dan Slăvescu
Ligia Luminița Vaida
author_facet Ligia Ioana Moga
Abel Emanuel Moca
Raluca Iurcov
Dan Slăvescu
Ligia Luminița Vaida
author_sort Ligia Ioana Moga
collection DOAJ
description Background/Objectives: Dental age estimation plays a critical role in pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, and forensic medicine. The Nolla method, widely applied globally, has shown variable accuracy across different populations. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the Nolla method in estimating the dental age of Romanian children and to identify potential discrepancies between dental and chronological ages. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 860 panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients aged 3–15.9 years in Oradea, Romania. The Nolla method was applied to estimate dental age, and the results were compared with chronological age. Statistical analyses, including Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U tests, were performed to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of the Nolla method. Results: The study analyzed 860 panoramic radiographs (356 boys and 504 girls). The average chronological age was 9.95 ± 2.48 years, while the average dental age, as estimated using the Nolla method, was 8.43 ± 2.13 years. Dental age was consistently lower than chronological age, with a median difference of 1.5 years (IQR: 0.9–2.2 years). Among the 13 age groups, the highest representation was found in the 8–8.9-year (14.7%) and 9–9.9-year (13.3%) groups. Gender differences were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001); girls demonstrated a larger median discrepancy of 1.7 years (IQR: 1.1–2.3 years) compared to boys at 1.15 years (IQR: 0.6–1.8 years). Notably, discrepancies increased with age, peaking at 2.6 years in the 14–14.9-year group (4.7% of the sample). The youngest group (3–3.9 years) showed the smallest difference of 0.3 years. Significant differences between chronological and dental ages were observed in 87.5% of the sample. Conclusions: The Nolla method consistently underestimated dental age in Romanian children, with greater discrepancies in older age groups and among girls. These findings highlight the need for the population-specific calibration of the method to improve its accuracy in both clinical and forensic contexts.
format Article
id doaj-art-8402b354725b4fcf90fd8da2c6d539b2
institution Kabale University
issn 2227-9067
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Children
spelling doaj-art-8402b354725b4fcf90fd8da2c6d539b22025-01-24T13:27:11ZengMDPI AGChildren2227-90672025-01-011216910.3390/children12010069Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern RomaniaLigia Ioana Moga0Abel Emanuel Moca1Raluca Iurcov2Dan Slăvescu3Ligia Luminița Vaida4Doctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 1 Universității Street, 410087 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 10 Piața 1 Decembrie Street, 410073 Oradea, RomaniaBackground/Objectives: Dental age estimation plays a critical role in pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, and forensic medicine. The Nolla method, widely applied globally, has shown variable accuracy across different populations. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and accuracy of the Nolla method in estimating the dental age of Romanian children and to identify potential discrepancies between dental and chronological ages. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 860 panoramic radiographs from pediatric patients aged 3–15.9 years in Oradea, Romania. The Nolla method was applied to estimate dental age, and the results were compared with chronological age. Statistical analyses, including Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U tests, were performed to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of the Nolla method. Results: The study analyzed 860 panoramic radiographs (356 boys and 504 girls). The average chronological age was 9.95 ± 2.48 years, while the average dental age, as estimated using the Nolla method, was 8.43 ± 2.13 years. Dental age was consistently lower than chronological age, with a median difference of 1.5 years (IQR: 0.9–2.2 years). Among the 13 age groups, the highest representation was found in the 8–8.9-year (14.7%) and 9–9.9-year (13.3%) groups. Gender differences were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001); girls demonstrated a larger median discrepancy of 1.7 years (IQR: 1.1–2.3 years) compared to boys at 1.15 years (IQR: 0.6–1.8 years). Notably, discrepancies increased with age, peaking at 2.6 years in the 14–14.9-year group (4.7% of the sample). The youngest group (3–3.9 years) showed the smallest difference of 0.3 years. Significant differences between chronological and dental ages were observed in 87.5% of the sample. Conclusions: The Nolla method consistently underestimated dental age in Romanian children, with greater discrepancies in older age groups and among girls. These findings highlight the need for the population-specific calibration of the method to improve its accuracy in both clinical and forensic contexts.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/1/69dental ageNolla methodRomania
spellingShingle Ligia Ioana Moga
Abel Emanuel Moca
Raluca Iurcov
Dan Slăvescu
Ligia Luminița Vaida
Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania
Children
dental age
Nolla method
Romania
title Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania
title_full Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania
title_fullStr Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania
title_short Evaluating the Nolla Method for Dental Age Estimation in Children from Northwestern Romania
title_sort evaluating the nolla method for dental age estimation in children from northwestern romania
topic dental age
Nolla method
Romania
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/1/69
work_keys_str_mv AT ligiaioanamoga evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania
AT abelemanuelmoca evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania
AT ralucaiurcov evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania
AT danslavescu evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania
AT ligialuminitavaida evaluatingthenollamethodfordentalageestimationinchildrenfromnorthwesternromania