Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training

# BACKGROUND The Tuck Jump Assessment (TJA) is a test used to assess technique flaws during a 10-second, high intensity, jumping bout. Although the TJA has broad clinical applicability, there is no standardized training to maximize the TJA measurement properties. # HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE To determine t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Racine, Meghan Warren, Craig Smith, Monica R. Lininger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North American Sports Medicine Institute 2021-02-01
Series:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.18662
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825139386945110016
author Kevin Racine
Meghan Warren
Craig Smith
Monica R. Lininger
author_facet Kevin Racine
Meghan Warren
Craig Smith
Monica R. Lininger
author_sort Kevin Racine
collection DOAJ
description # BACKGROUND The Tuck Jump Assessment (TJA) is a test used to assess technique flaws during a 10-second, high intensity, jumping bout. Although the TJA has broad clinical applicability, there is no standardized training to maximize the TJA measurement properties. # HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE To determine the reliability of the TJA using varied healthcare professionals following an online standardized training program. The authors hypothesized that the total score will have moderate to excellent levels of intra- and interrater reliability. # STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional reliability. # METHODS A website was created by a physical therapist (PT) with videos, written descriptors of the 10 TJA technique flaws, and examples of what constituted no flaw, minor flaw, or major flaw (0,1,2) using published standards. The website was then validated (both face and content) by four experts. Three raters of different professions: a PT, an AT, and a Strength and Conditioning Coach Certified (SCCC) were selected due to their expertise with injury and movement. Raters used the online standardized training, scored 41 videos of participants' TJAs, then scored them again two weeks later. Reliability estimates were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for total scores of 10 technique flaws and Krippendorff α (K α) for the individual technique flaws (ordinal). # RESULTS Eleven of 50 individual technique flaws were above the acceptable level (K α = 0.80). The total score had moderate interrater reliability in both sessions (Session 1: ICC~2,2~ = 0.64; 95% CI (Confidence Interval) (0.34-0.81); Standard Error Measurement (SEM) = 0.66 technique flaws and Session 2: ICC~2,2~ = 0.56; 95% CI (0.04-0.79); SEM = 1.30). Rater 1had a good reliability (ICC~2,2~ = 0.76; 95% CI (0.54-0.87); SEM = 0.26), rater 2 had a moderate reliability (ICC~2,2~ = 0.62; 95% CI (0.24-0.80); SEM =0.41) and rater 3 had excellent reliability (ICC~2,2~ = 0.98; 95% CI (0.97-0.99); SEM =0.01). # CONCLUSION All raters had at least good reliability estimates for the total score. The same level of consistency was not seen when evaluating each technique flaw. These findings suggest that the total score may not be as accurate when compared to individual technique flaws and should be used with caution. # LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b
format Article
id doaj-art-83cbc60515844ecc99c221791c05b658
institution Kabale University
issn 2159-2896
language English
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher North American Sports Medicine Institute
record_format Article
series International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
spelling doaj-art-83cbc60515844ecc99c221791c05b6582025-02-11T20:29:54ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962021-02-01161Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater TrainingKevin RacineMeghan WarrenCraig SmithMonica R. Lininger# BACKGROUND The Tuck Jump Assessment (TJA) is a test used to assess technique flaws during a 10-second, high intensity, jumping bout. Although the TJA has broad clinical applicability, there is no standardized training to maximize the TJA measurement properties. # HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE To determine the reliability of the TJA using varied healthcare professionals following an online standardized training program. The authors hypothesized that the total score will have moderate to excellent levels of intra- and interrater reliability. # STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional reliability. # METHODS A website was created by a physical therapist (PT) with videos, written descriptors of the 10 TJA technique flaws, and examples of what constituted no flaw, minor flaw, or major flaw (0,1,2) using published standards. The website was then validated (both face and content) by four experts. Three raters of different professions: a PT, an AT, and a Strength and Conditioning Coach Certified (SCCC) were selected due to their expertise with injury and movement. Raters used the online standardized training, scored 41 videos of participants' TJAs, then scored them again two weeks later. Reliability estimates were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for total scores of 10 technique flaws and Krippendorff α (K α) for the individual technique flaws (ordinal). # RESULTS Eleven of 50 individual technique flaws were above the acceptable level (K α = 0.80). The total score had moderate interrater reliability in both sessions (Session 1: ICC~2,2~ = 0.64; 95% CI (Confidence Interval) (0.34-0.81); Standard Error Measurement (SEM) = 0.66 technique flaws and Session 2: ICC~2,2~ = 0.56; 95% CI (0.04-0.79); SEM = 1.30). Rater 1had a good reliability (ICC~2,2~ = 0.76; 95% CI (0.54-0.87); SEM = 0.26), rater 2 had a moderate reliability (ICC~2,2~ = 0.62; 95% CI (0.24-0.80); SEM =0.41) and rater 3 had excellent reliability (ICC~2,2~ = 0.98; 95% CI (0.97-0.99); SEM =0.01). # CONCLUSION All raters had at least good reliability estimates for the total score. The same level of consistency was not seen when evaluating each technique flaw. These findings suggest that the total score may not be as accurate when compared to individual technique flaws and should be used with caution. # LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3bhttps://doi.org/10.26603/001c.18662
spellingShingle Kevin Racine
Meghan Warren
Craig Smith
Monica R. Lininger
Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
title Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training
title_full Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training
title_fullStr Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training
title_short Reliability of the Tuck Jump Assessment Using Standardized Rater Training
title_sort reliability of the tuck jump assessment using standardized rater training
url https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.18662
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinracine reliabilityofthetuckjumpassessmentusingstandardizedratertraining
AT meghanwarren reliabilityofthetuckjumpassessmentusingstandardizedratertraining
AT craigsmith reliabilityofthetuckjumpassessmentusingstandardizedratertraining
AT monicarlininger reliabilityofthetuckjumpassessmentusingstandardizedratertraining