Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience

Surgery is pivotal in treating esophageal cancer; hybrid esophagectomy, which combines minimally invasive and open techniques, shows promising outcomes. This historical cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of standard open esophagectomy with hybrid esophagectomy. Overall, 58 patients who unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evgeny Toneev, Oleg Aleksandrov, Oleg Pikin, Lyudmila Danilova, Oleg Midlenko, Vladimir Midlenko, Andrey Chavga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2024-10-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijms.sums.ac.ir/article_50377_a04ed9fba3695139c003ea4d42923f1c.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850209699191848960
author Evgeny Toneev
Oleg Aleksandrov
Oleg Pikin
Lyudmila Danilova
Oleg Midlenko
Vladimir Midlenko
Andrey Chavga
author_facet Evgeny Toneev
Oleg Aleksandrov
Oleg Pikin
Lyudmila Danilova
Oleg Midlenko
Vladimir Midlenko
Andrey Chavga
author_sort Evgeny Toneev
collection DOAJ
description Surgery is pivotal in treating esophageal cancer; hybrid esophagectomy, which combines minimally invasive and open techniques, shows promising outcomes. This historical cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of standard open esophagectomy with hybrid esophagectomy. Overall, 58 patients who underwent either hybrid or open esophagectomy at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Clinic, Russia, from January 2015 to December 2023 were included. Data on demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The primary measures were overall complications and anastomotic leakage rates. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson’s Chi square test and t test via StatTech software (version 2.8.8). The number of removed lymph nodes was higher in the hybrid group (24±9) than in the open group (15±7) (P<0.001). In addition, the hybrid esophagectomy group showed significant reductions in operational time and blood loss (P<0.001 and P=0.014, respectively). The need for blood transfusion was higher in the open esophagectomy group (P=0.043). The postoperative length of stay in the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (open=20±8 days, hybrid=17±7 days, P=0.178). Cardiac complications were more frequent after an open esophagectomy (P=0.044). Hybrid esophagectomy reduced postoperative cardiac complications and other adverse events while maintaining satisfactory oncological outcomes. It had advantages over standard open esophagectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirements, suggesting its efficacy for esophageal cancer patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-83bcd796d17847f3be5012d84450ce47
institution OA Journals
issn 0253-0716
1735-3688
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-83bcd796d17847f3be5012d84450ce472025-08-20T02:09:56ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Medical Sciences0253-07161735-36882024-10-01491067167610.30476/ijms.2024.101493.341950377Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre ExperienceEvgeny Toneev0Oleg Aleksandrov1Oleg Pikin2Lyudmila Danilova3Oleg Midlenko4Vladimir Midlenko5Andrey Chavga6State Healthcare Institution Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, RussiaNational Medical Research Center of Phthisiopulmonology, P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, RussiaP.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, RussiaState Healthcare Institution, Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovsk, RussiaState Healthcare Institution, Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovsk, RussiaDepartment of Hospital Surgery, Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, RussiaAnesthesiology, Resuscitation, Urology, Traumatology and Orthopedics, Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, RussiaSurgery is pivotal in treating esophageal cancer; hybrid esophagectomy, which combines minimally invasive and open techniques, shows promising outcomes. This historical cohort study compared the surgical outcomes of standard open esophagectomy with hybrid esophagectomy. Overall, 58 patients who underwent either hybrid or open esophagectomy at the Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Oncology Clinic, Russia, from January 2015 to December 2023 were included. Data on demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The primary measures were overall complications and anastomotic leakage rates. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson’s Chi square test and t test via StatTech software (version 2.8.8). The number of removed lymph nodes was higher in the hybrid group (24±9) than in the open group (15±7) (P<0.001). In addition, the hybrid esophagectomy group showed significant reductions in operational time and blood loss (P<0.001 and P=0.014, respectively). The need for blood transfusion was higher in the open esophagectomy group (P=0.043). The postoperative length of stay in the hospital did not differ significantly between the two groups (open=20±8 days, hybrid=17±7 days, P=0.178). Cardiac complications were more frequent after an open esophagectomy (P=0.044). Hybrid esophagectomy reduced postoperative cardiac complications and other adverse events while maintaining satisfactory oncological outcomes. It had advantages over standard open esophagectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirements, suggesting its efficacy for esophageal cancer patients.https://ijms.sums.ac.ir/article_50377_a04ed9fba3695139c003ea4d42923f1c.pdfesophageal neoplasmsesophagectomypostoperative complications
spellingShingle Evgeny Toneev
Oleg Aleksandrov
Oleg Pikin
Lyudmila Danilova
Oleg Midlenko
Vladimir Midlenko
Andrey Chavga
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences
esophageal neoplasms
esophagectomy
postoperative complications
title Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience
title_full Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience
title_short Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in Hybrid and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Regional Russian Cancer Centre Experience
title_sort comparative analysis of surgical outcomes in hybrid and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer a regional russian cancer centre experience
topic esophageal neoplasms
esophagectomy
postoperative complications
url https://ijms.sums.ac.ir/article_50377_a04ed9fba3695139c003ea4d42923f1c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT evgenytoneev comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesinhybridandopenesophagectomyforesophagealcanceraregionalrussiancancercentreexperience
AT olegaleksandrov comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesinhybridandopenesophagectomyforesophagealcanceraregionalrussiancancercentreexperience
AT olegpikin comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesinhybridandopenesophagectomyforesophagealcanceraregionalrussiancancercentreexperience
AT lyudmiladanilova comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesinhybridandopenesophagectomyforesophagealcanceraregionalrussiancancercentreexperience
AT olegmidlenko comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesinhybridandopenesophagectomyforesophagealcanceraregionalrussiancancercentreexperience
AT vladimirmidlenko comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesinhybridandopenesophagectomyforesophagealcanceraregionalrussiancancercentreexperience
AT andreychavga comparativeanalysisofsurgicaloutcomesinhybridandopenesophagectomyforesophagealcanceraregionalrussiancancercentreexperience