Gavrilo Stefanović Venclović’s Mač duhovni: The use of Turkish loanwords in translations of biblical quotations
The paper presents the Turkish loanwords used in biblical quotations in Venclović’s translation of Mech duhovniy (Mač duhovni, Sword of the Spirit). By comparing them with the source in Church Slavonic (of the Russian redaction), Turkish loanwords that are used as a direct translation of a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Južnoslovenski Filolog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2024/0350-185X2402063M.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The paper presents the Turkish loanwords used in biblical quotations in
Venclović’s translation of Mech duhovniy (Mač duhovni, Sword of the Spirit).
By comparing them with the source in Church Slavonic (of the Russian
redaction), Turkish loanwords that are used as a direct translation of a
Church Slavonic word (zejtin, krevet, misirski, hazina, haramija, hrsuzin,
čak) were extracted, as well as those that change the translated real object
(korkuluk, minđuša, tabandže), those that are part of more or less broader
explications (adet, badava, bašča, dumen, durma, đubre, zanat, inatiti se,
kavga, kadar, somun, tane) and those that appear both as a translation of a
certain CSl. word and within an explication (ama, bak(a)rni). In addition, a
comparison was made with Vuk’s translation of the New Testament and
Daničić’s translation of the Old Testament, to detect possible overlaps,
since Turkish loanwords were used in both translations. In the places where
a single Church Slavonic word is translated with a Turkish loanword, all
other translations of the same CSl. word were found in the entire analyzed
part of the manuscript, to show in which cases Venclović used a Turkish
loanword, even though he had other vernacular words at his disposal. For 15
Turkish words, we can claim that Venclović had another equivalent in his
lexical stock, and in 11 cases a purely vernacular word (as an equivalent
for the Turkish words ama, đubre, zanat, inatiti se, kavga, korkuluk,
krevet, minđuša, somun, hazina, čak), and in three instances a common word
for vernacular and Church Slavonic (as an equivalent for the Turkish
loanwords adet, zejtin, haramija). In one case, he only used the Church
Slavonic word as an equivalent for the Turkish word hrsuzin. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0350-185X 2406-0763 |