A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research

Mentorship is a vital part of the training provided in the K and T programs funded by the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). However, the inputs, indicators, and outcomes associated with a successful mentoring relationship remain poorly understood. In this review, we critically examin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Phillip Ianni, Elias Samuels, Ellen Champagne, Eric Nehl, Deborah DiazGranados
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866125100964/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849770289802510336
author Phillip Ianni
Elias Samuels
Ellen Champagne
Eric Nehl
Deborah DiazGranados
author_facet Phillip Ianni
Elias Samuels
Ellen Champagne
Eric Nehl
Deborah DiazGranados
author_sort Phillip Ianni
collection DOAJ
description Mentorship is a vital part of the training provided in the K and T programs funded by the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). However, the inputs, indicators, and outcomes associated with a successful mentoring relationship remain poorly understood. In this review, we critically examine the current body of literature on mentorship in a CTSA context. We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature for relevant research articles. We included articles that were contextualized within a CTSA hub, examined a mentorship program, and conducted evaluation research. Through an initial search of online databases and by reviewing reference sections of relevant articles, we identified 141 potentially relevant articles. Twenty-five of these articles met our inclusion criteria. We identified three categories of research: nationwide institutional surveys of CTSA mentorship programs, mentored research training programs, and mentor training programs. While the findings highlighted the effectiveness of mentor training and mentored training programs, there is a notable lack of assessment of mentoring inputs and indicators. Based on our review, we propose a model for the evaluation of CTSA mentorship that includes measurable inputs, indicators, and outcomes. This model provides a holistic framework for evaluators and CTSA program directors to better understand their mentorship programs.
format Article
id doaj-art-8375e5c50bad4348adfb3930db7fdb05
institution DOAJ
issn 2059-8661
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj-art-8375e5c50bad4348adfb3930db7fdb052025-08-20T03:03:04ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612025-01-01910.1017/cts.2025.10096A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future researchPhillip Ianni0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1264-7322Elias Samuels1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-3382Ellen Champagne2Eric Nehl3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-9235Deborah DiazGranados4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-7093Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USAWright Regional Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USAMentorship is a vital part of the training provided in the K and T programs funded by the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA). However, the inputs, indicators, and outcomes associated with a successful mentoring relationship remain poorly understood. In this review, we critically examine the current body of literature on mentorship in a CTSA context. We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature for relevant research articles. We included articles that were contextualized within a CTSA hub, examined a mentorship program, and conducted evaluation research. Through an initial search of online databases and by reviewing reference sections of relevant articles, we identified 141 potentially relevant articles. Twenty-five of these articles met our inclusion criteria. We identified three categories of research: nationwide institutional surveys of CTSA mentorship programs, mentored research training programs, and mentor training programs. While the findings highlighted the effectiveness of mentor training and mentored training programs, there is a notable lack of assessment of mentoring inputs and indicators. Based on our review, we propose a model for the evaluation of CTSA mentorship that includes measurable inputs, indicators, and outcomes. This model provides a holistic framework for evaluators and CTSA program directors to better understand their mentorship programs.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866125100964/type/journal_articleTranslational sciencementor trainingctsaevaluationmentorship
spellingShingle Phillip Ianni
Elias Samuels
Ellen Champagne
Eric Nehl
Deborah DiazGranados
A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Translational science
mentor training
ctsa
evaluation
mentorship
title A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research
title_full A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research
title_fullStr A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research
title_short A scoping review of mentorship in a CTSA context: A summary of past work and an agenda for future research
title_sort scoping review of mentorship in a ctsa context a summary of past work and an agenda for future research
topic Translational science
mentor training
ctsa
evaluation
mentorship
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866125100964/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipianni ascopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT eliassamuels ascopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT ellenchampagne ascopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT ericnehl ascopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT deborahdiazgranados ascopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT phillipianni scopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT eliassamuels scopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT ellenchampagne scopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT ericnehl scopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch
AT deborahdiazgranados scopingreviewofmentorshipinactsacontextasummaryofpastworkandanagendaforfutureresearch