Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens

A mixed Eimeria spp. challenge model was designed to assess the effects of challenge on broiler chicken performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome for future use to evaluate alternative strategies for controlling coccidiosis in broiler chickens. The experimental design involved broile...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danielle Graham, Victor M. Petrone-Garcia, Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco, Makenly E. Coles, Marco A. Juarez-Estrada, Juan D. Latorre, Jianmin Chai, Stephanie Shouse, Jiangchao Zhao, Aaron J. Forga, Roberto Senas-Cuesta, Lauren Laverty, Kristen Martin, Carolina Trujillo-Peralta, Ileana Loeza, Latasha S. Gray, Billy M. Hargis, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1224647/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591525616287744
author Danielle Graham
Victor M. Petrone-Garcia
Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco
Makenly E. Coles
Marco A. Juarez-Estrada
Juan D. Latorre
Jianmin Chai
Stephanie Shouse
Jiangchao Zhao
Aaron J. Forga
Roberto Senas-Cuesta
Lauren Laverty
Kristen Martin
Carolina Trujillo-Peralta
Ileana Loeza
Latasha S. Gray
Billy M. Hargis
Guillermo Tellez-Isaias
author_facet Danielle Graham
Victor M. Petrone-Garcia
Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco
Makenly E. Coles
Marco A. Juarez-Estrada
Juan D. Latorre
Jianmin Chai
Stephanie Shouse
Jiangchao Zhao
Aaron J. Forga
Roberto Senas-Cuesta
Lauren Laverty
Kristen Martin
Carolina Trujillo-Peralta
Ileana Loeza
Latasha S. Gray
Billy M. Hargis
Guillermo Tellez-Isaias
author_sort Danielle Graham
collection DOAJ
description A mixed Eimeria spp. challenge model was designed to assess the effects of challenge on broiler chicken performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome for future use to evaluate alternative strategies for controlling coccidiosis in broiler chickens. The experimental design involved broiler chickens divided into two groups: a control group (uninfected) and a positive control group, infected with Eimeria acervulina (EA), Eimeria maxima (EM), and Eimeria tenella (ET). At day-of-hatch, 240 off-sex male broiler chicks were randomized and allocated to one of two treatment groups. The treatment groups included: (1) Non-challenged (NC, n = 5 replicate pens); and (2) challenged control (PC, n = 7 replicate pens) with 20 chickens/pen. Pen weights were recorded at d0, d16, d31, d42, and d52 to determine average body weight (BW) and (BWG). Feed intake was measured at d16, d31, d42, and d52 to calculate feed conversion ratio (FCR). Four diet phases included a starter d0–16, grower d16–31, finisher d31–42, and withdrawal d42–52 diet. At d18, chickens were orally challenged with 200 EA, 3,000 EM, and 500 ET sporulated oocysts/chicken. At d24 (6-day post-challenge) and d37 (19-day post-challenge), intestinal lesion scores were recorded. Additionally, at d24, FITC-d was used as a biomarker to evaluate intestinal permeability and ileal tissue sections were collected for histopathology and gene expression of tight junction proteins. Ileal and cecal contents were also collected to assess the impact of challenge on the microbiome. BWG and FCR from d16–31 was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in PC compared to NC. At d24, intestinal lesion scores were markedly higher in the PC compared to the NC. Intestinal permeability was significantly increased in the PC group based on serum FITC-d levels. Cadherin 1 (CDH1), calprotectin (CALPR), and connexin 45 (Cx45) expression was also upregulated in the ileum of the PC group at d24 (6-day post-challenge) while villin 1 (VIL1) was downregulated in the ileum of the PC group. Additionally, Clostridium perfringens (ASV1) was enriched in the cecal content of the PC group. This model could be used to assess the effect of alternative coccidiosis control methods during the post-challenge with EA, EM, and ET.
format Article
id doaj-art-83390a32ea354a0294ac863b224cad9c
institution Kabale University
issn 2297-1769
language English
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj-art-83390a32ea354a0294ac863b224cad9c2025-01-22T10:55:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692023-08-011010.3389/fvets.2023.12246471224647Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickensDanielle Graham0Victor M. Petrone-Garcia1Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco2Makenly E. Coles3Marco A. Juarez-Estrada4Juan D. Latorre5Jianmin Chai6Stephanie Shouse7Jiangchao Zhao8Aaron J. Forga9Roberto Senas-Cuesta10Lauren Laverty11Kristen Martin12Carolina Trujillo-Peralta13Ileana Loeza14Latasha S. Gray15Billy M. Hargis16Guillermo Tellez-Isaias17Division of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesCollege of Higher Studies Cuautitlan, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Cuautitlan Izcalli, MexicoDepartment of Medicine and Zootechnics of Birds, College of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics (UNAM), Mexico City, MexicoDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDepartment of Medicine and Zootechnics of Birds, College of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics (UNAM), Mexico City, MexicoDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, ChinaDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesDivision of Agriculture, Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United StatesA mixed Eimeria spp. challenge model was designed to assess the effects of challenge on broiler chicken performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome for future use to evaluate alternative strategies for controlling coccidiosis in broiler chickens. The experimental design involved broiler chickens divided into two groups: a control group (uninfected) and a positive control group, infected with Eimeria acervulina (EA), Eimeria maxima (EM), and Eimeria tenella (ET). At day-of-hatch, 240 off-sex male broiler chicks were randomized and allocated to one of two treatment groups. The treatment groups included: (1) Non-challenged (NC, n = 5 replicate pens); and (2) challenged control (PC, n = 7 replicate pens) with 20 chickens/pen. Pen weights were recorded at d0, d16, d31, d42, and d52 to determine average body weight (BW) and (BWG). Feed intake was measured at d16, d31, d42, and d52 to calculate feed conversion ratio (FCR). Four diet phases included a starter d0–16, grower d16–31, finisher d31–42, and withdrawal d42–52 diet. At d18, chickens were orally challenged with 200 EA, 3,000 EM, and 500 ET sporulated oocysts/chicken. At d24 (6-day post-challenge) and d37 (19-day post-challenge), intestinal lesion scores were recorded. Additionally, at d24, FITC-d was used as a biomarker to evaluate intestinal permeability and ileal tissue sections were collected for histopathology and gene expression of tight junction proteins. Ileal and cecal contents were also collected to assess the impact of challenge on the microbiome. BWG and FCR from d16–31 was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in PC compared to NC. At d24, intestinal lesion scores were markedly higher in the PC compared to the NC. Intestinal permeability was significantly increased in the PC group based on serum FITC-d levels. Cadherin 1 (CDH1), calprotectin (CALPR), and connexin 45 (Cx45) expression was also upregulated in the ileum of the PC group at d24 (6-day post-challenge) while villin 1 (VIL1) was downregulated in the ileum of the PC group. Additionally, Clostridium perfringens (ASV1) was enriched in the cecal content of the PC group. This model could be used to assess the effect of alternative coccidiosis control methods during the post-challenge with EA, EM, and ET.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1224647/fullcoccidiosischickensintestinal permeabilityperformancechallenge model
spellingShingle Danielle Graham
Victor M. Petrone-Garcia
Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco
Makenly E. Coles
Marco A. Juarez-Estrada
Juan D. Latorre
Jianmin Chai
Stephanie Shouse
Jiangchao Zhao
Aaron J. Forga
Roberto Senas-Cuesta
Lauren Laverty
Kristen Martin
Carolina Trujillo-Peralta
Ileana Loeza
Latasha S. Gray
Billy M. Hargis
Guillermo Tellez-Isaias
Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
coccidiosis
chickens
intestinal permeability
performance
challenge model
title Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens
title_full Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens
title_fullStr Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens
title_short Assessing the effects of a mixed Eimeria spp. challenge on performance, intestinal integrity, and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens
title_sort assessing the effects of a mixed eimeria spp challenge on performance intestinal integrity and the gut microbiome of broiler chickens
topic coccidiosis
chickens
intestinal permeability
performance
challenge model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1224647/full
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellegraham assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT victormpetronegarcia assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT xochitlhernandezvelasco assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT makenlyecoles assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT marcoajuarezestrada assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT juandlatorre assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT jianminchai assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT stephanieshouse assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT jiangchaozhao assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT aaronjforga assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT robertosenascuesta assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT laurenlaverty assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT kristenmartin assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT carolinatrujilloperalta assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT ileanaloeza assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT latashasgray assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT billymhargis assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens
AT guillermotellezisaias assessingtheeffectsofamixedeimeriasppchallengeonperformanceintestinalintegrityandthegutmicrobiomeofbroilerchickens