Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)

Objective To quantify how well phase III randomised clinical trials in both SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) represents a real-world SLE cohort.Methods Literature reviews were performed of major published phase III SLE (n=12) and LN (n=6) clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov). Inclusion and exclusion cri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ian N Bruce, Eoghan M McCarthy, Ben Parker, Sarah Dyball, Sophie Collinson, Emily Sutton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-01
Series:Lupus Science and Medicine
Online Access:https://lupus.bmj.com/content/8/1/e000513.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064184988925952
author Ian N Bruce
Eoghan M McCarthy
Ben Parker
Sarah Dyball
Sophie Collinson
Emily Sutton
author_facet Ian N Bruce
Eoghan M McCarthy
Ben Parker
Sarah Dyball
Sophie Collinson
Emily Sutton
author_sort Ian N Bruce
collection DOAJ
description Objective To quantify how well phase III randomised clinical trials in both SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) represents a real-world SLE cohort.Methods Literature reviews were performed of major published phase III SLE (n=12) and LN (n=6) clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov). Inclusion and exclusion criteria common across these trials were collated for non-renal SLE or LN trials, and applied to patients recruited to the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) starting either biological or standard-of-care (SOC) therapies.Results We recruited 837 patients to the BILAG-BR from September 2010 to June 2018, starting either SOC (n=125, 15%) or a biological medication (n=712, 85%). Active LN, defined as a BILAG A in the renal domain occurred in 20% (n=166). Overall, 530 (63%) patients were ineligible to participate in non-renal SLE clinical trials and 72 (43%) patients with active LN would be ineligible for LN trials. The most common reasons for ineligibility from the non-renal lupus trials included active renal involvement (n=166, 20%) and low disease activity (n=114, 15%). For LN trials, the most common exclusion met was pre-existing renal impairment (n=15, 9%). Patients with fewer comorbidities were more likely to be eligible to participate in non-renal SLE trials.Conclusions In this national register of patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, nearly two-thirds would not be eligible for recruitment to key SLE clinical trials nor would almost half of those with active LN. Eligibility criteria may excessively constrain enrolment and thus, how we can generalise trial results in a real-world setting.
format Article
id doaj-art-83289292fbbe44128d68d206ee9d0efe
institution DOAJ
issn 2053-8790
language English
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Lupus Science and Medicine
spelling doaj-art-83289292fbbe44128d68d206ee9d0efe2025-08-20T02:49:22ZengBMJ Publishing GroupLupus Science and Medicine2053-87902021-04-018110.1136/lupus-2021-000513Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)Ian N Bruce0Eoghan M McCarthy1Ben Parker2Sarah Dyball3Sophie Collinson4Emily Sutton5Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UKThe Kellgren Centre for Rheumatology, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Manchester BRC, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United KingdomCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UKKellgren Centre for Rheumatology, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United KingdomCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UKObjective To quantify how well phase III randomised clinical trials in both SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) represents a real-world SLE cohort.Methods Literature reviews were performed of major published phase III SLE (n=12) and LN (n=6) clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov). Inclusion and exclusion criteria common across these trials were collated for non-renal SLE or LN trials, and applied to patients recruited to the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) starting either biological or standard-of-care (SOC) therapies.Results We recruited 837 patients to the BILAG-BR from September 2010 to June 2018, starting either SOC (n=125, 15%) or a biological medication (n=712, 85%). Active LN, defined as a BILAG A in the renal domain occurred in 20% (n=166). Overall, 530 (63%) patients were ineligible to participate in non-renal SLE clinical trials and 72 (43%) patients with active LN would be ineligible for LN trials. The most common reasons for ineligibility from the non-renal lupus trials included active renal involvement (n=166, 20%) and low disease activity (n=114, 15%). For LN trials, the most common exclusion met was pre-existing renal impairment (n=15, 9%). Patients with fewer comorbidities were more likely to be eligible to participate in non-renal SLE trials.Conclusions In this national register of patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, nearly two-thirds would not be eligible for recruitment to key SLE clinical trials nor would almost half of those with active LN. Eligibility criteria may excessively constrain enrolment and thus, how we can generalise trial results in a real-world setting.https://lupus.bmj.com/content/8/1/e000513.full
spellingShingle Ian N Bruce
Eoghan M McCarthy
Ben Parker
Sarah Dyball
Sophie Collinson
Emily Sutton
Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)
Lupus Science and Medicine
title Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)
title_full Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)
title_fullStr Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)
title_full_unstemmed Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)
title_short Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR)
title_sort lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real world setting results from the british isles lupus assessment group biologics register bilag br
url https://lupus.bmj.com/content/8/1/e000513.full
work_keys_str_mv AT iannbruce lupusclinicaltrialeligibilityinarealworldsettingresultsfromthebritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbiologicsregisterbilagbr
AT eoghanmmccarthy lupusclinicaltrialeligibilityinarealworldsettingresultsfromthebritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbiologicsregisterbilagbr
AT benparker lupusclinicaltrialeligibilityinarealworldsettingresultsfromthebritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbiologicsregisterbilagbr
AT sarahdyball lupusclinicaltrialeligibilityinarealworldsettingresultsfromthebritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbiologicsregisterbilagbr
AT sophiecollinson lupusclinicaltrialeligibilityinarealworldsettingresultsfromthebritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbiologicsregisterbilagbr
AT emilysutton lupusclinicaltrialeligibilityinarealworldsettingresultsfromthebritishisleslupusassessmentgroupbiologicsregisterbilagbr