Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma

Objective: Mepolizumab is indicated as an additional treatment of severe refractory eosinophilic asthma. The observed differences in population subgroups according to plasma eosinophil count, the existence of patients with high levels of immunoglobulin E who are candidates of omalizumab and mepol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel David Gil-Sierra, Leticia García-Mochón, Emilio Jesús Alegre-del Rey, Catalina Alarcón de la Lastra-Romero, Marina Sánchez-Hidalgo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-11-01
Series:Farmacia Hospitalaria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/11221.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850180637383720960
author Manuel David Gil-Sierra
Leticia García-Mochón
Emilio Jesús Alegre-del Rey
Catalina Alarcón de la Lastra-Romero
Marina Sánchez-Hidalgo
author_facet Manuel David Gil-Sierra
Leticia García-Mochón
Emilio Jesús Alegre-del Rey
Catalina Alarcón de la Lastra-Romero
Marina Sánchez-Hidalgo
author_sort Manuel David Gil-Sierra
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Mepolizumab is indicated as an additional treatment of severe refractory eosinophilic asthma. The observed differences in population subgroups according to plasma eosinophil count, the existence of patients with high levels of immunoglobulin E who are candidates of omalizumab and mepolizumab, as well as mepolizumab’s economic impact, lead to make efficient economic studies for clinical decision making. The aim was to analyze mepolizumab’s cost-efficacy and budget impact. Method: Cost comparison and the use of mepolizumab’s budgetary impact was performed, from the Spanish National Health System’s perspective. Among the assessed alternatives, inhaled systemic corticosteroids, plus long acting beta agonist (β2) and/or oral systemic corticosteroids in patients with non immunoglobulin E-mediated severe allergic asthma, and said treatment along with omalizumab in patients with immunoglobulin E mediated eosinophilic allergic asthma were included. Its efficacy was evaluated through avoided clinically relevant exacerbations. The direct costs associated with exacerbation were assessed. Results: Mepolizumab’s long run average incremental cost regarding omalizumab’s is 797 euros per patient a year. Considering omalizumab’s alternative discounted price, including mepolizumab for patients with immunoglobulin E mediated eosinophilic allergic asthma would increase public spending from 2.3 to 4.6 million euros. Given omalizumab’s notified price, the gradual introduction of mepolizumab in the Spanish National Health System would save 3.6 million euros in three years. For non immunoglobulin E-mediated severe asthma patients, the avoided cost/exacerbation by introducing mepolizumab is 15,085 euros, assuming a gradual market penetration of mepolizumab. In patients with ≥ 500 eosinophils/μL, this cost decreases to 7,767 euros per avoided exacerbation with a budgetary impact of 183.2 million euros in three years with a progressive penetration of mepolizumab. Conclusions: The cost comparison between mepolizumab and omalizumab in immunoglobulin E mediated eosinophilic asthma patients suggests a use of the lower cost drug, promoting price competition. Additionally, prioritizing its use among non immunoglobulin E-mediated severe refractory eosinophilic asthma patients and ≥ 500 eosinophils/μL plasma level patients, would improve its efficiency as well as reducing its budgetary impact.
format Article
id doaj-art-8307deefe40f460caa68c104913eea6a
institution OA Journals
issn 1130-6343
2171-8695
language English
publishDate 2019-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Farmacia Hospitalaria
spelling doaj-art-8307deefe40f460caa68c104913eea6a2025-08-20T02:18:04ZengElsevierFarmacia Hospitalaria1130-63432171-86952019-11-0143618719310.7399/fh.11221Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthmaManuel David Gil-Sierra0Leticia García-Mochón1Emilio Jesús Alegre-del Rey2Catalina Alarcón de la Lastra-Romero3Marina Sánchez-Hidalgo4Pharmacy Service, University Hospital of Puerto Real, Puerto Real, SpainAndalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain. Center for Biomedical Research in Network in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. Institute of Biosanitary Research ibs. Granada, Granada, Spain. University Hospitals of Granada / University of Granada, Granada, Spain.Pharmacy Service, Puerto Real University Hospital, Puerto Real. SpainDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, SpainDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, SpainObjective: Mepolizumab is indicated as an additional treatment of severe refractory eosinophilic asthma. The observed differences in population subgroups according to plasma eosinophil count, the existence of patients with high levels of immunoglobulin E who are candidates of omalizumab and mepolizumab, as well as mepolizumab’s economic impact, lead to make efficient economic studies for clinical decision making. The aim was to analyze mepolizumab’s cost-efficacy and budget impact. Method: Cost comparison and the use of mepolizumab’s budgetary impact was performed, from the Spanish National Health System’s perspective. Among the assessed alternatives, inhaled systemic corticosteroids, plus long acting beta agonist (β2) and/or oral systemic corticosteroids in patients with non immunoglobulin E-mediated severe allergic asthma, and said treatment along with omalizumab in patients with immunoglobulin E mediated eosinophilic allergic asthma were included. Its efficacy was evaluated through avoided clinically relevant exacerbations. The direct costs associated with exacerbation were assessed. Results: Mepolizumab’s long run average incremental cost regarding omalizumab’s is 797 euros per patient a year. Considering omalizumab’s alternative discounted price, including mepolizumab for patients with immunoglobulin E mediated eosinophilic allergic asthma would increase public spending from 2.3 to 4.6 million euros. Given omalizumab’s notified price, the gradual introduction of mepolizumab in the Spanish National Health System would save 3.6 million euros in three years. For non immunoglobulin E-mediated severe asthma patients, the avoided cost/exacerbation by introducing mepolizumab is 15,085 euros, assuming a gradual market penetration of mepolizumab. In patients with ≥ 500 eosinophils/μL, this cost decreases to 7,767 euros per avoided exacerbation with a budgetary impact of 183.2 million euros in three years with a progressive penetration of mepolizumab. Conclusions: The cost comparison between mepolizumab and omalizumab in immunoglobulin E mediated eosinophilic asthma patients suggests a use of the lower cost drug, promoting price competition. Additionally, prioritizing its use among non immunoglobulin E-mediated severe refractory eosinophilic asthma patients and ≥ 500 eosinophils/μL plasma level patients, would improve its efficiency as well as reducing its budgetary impact.http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/11221.pdfcostseconomic assessmentbudgetary impactmepolizumabomalizumab
spellingShingle Manuel David Gil-Sierra
Leticia García-Mochón
Emilio Jesús Alegre-del Rey
Catalina Alarcón de la Lastra-Romero
Marina Sánchez-Hidalgo
Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
Farmacia Hospitalaria
costs
economic assessment
budgetary impact
mepolizumab
omalizumab
title Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
title_full Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
title_fullStr Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
title_short Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
title_sort economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma
topic costs
economic assessment
budgetary impact
mepolizumab
omalizumab
url http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/11221.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT manueldavidgilsierra economicevaluationandbudgetaryburdenofmepolizumabinsevererefractoryeosinophilicasthma
AT leticiagarciamochon economicevaluationandbudgetaryburdenofmepolizumabinsevererefractoryeosinophilicasthma
AT emiliojesusalegredelrey economicevaluationandbudgetaryburdenofmepolizumabinsevererefractoryeosinophilicasthma
AT catalinaalarcondelalastraromero economicevaluationandbudgetaryburdenofmepolizumabinsevererefractoryeosinophilicasthma
AT marinasanchezhidalgo economicevaluationandbudgetaryburdenofmepolizumabinsevererefractoryeosinophilicasthma