Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trial

Background: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries are often at risk of developing hypoxemia, increased airway pressure, and barotrauma due to pneumoperitoneum. Prolongation of inspiratory time in a respiratory cycle has been found to improve oxygenation without any increase in peak airway press...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prathap Gunasekaran, Ramyavel Thangavelu, Sivakumar Segaran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_131_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591040084705280
author Prathap Gunasekaran
Ramyavel Thangavelu
Sivakumar Segaran
author_facet Prathap Gunasekaran
Ramyavel Thangavelu
Sivakumar Segaran
author_sort Prathap Gunasekaran
collection DOAJ
description Background: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries are often at risk of developing hypoxemia, increased airway pressure, and barotrauma due to pneumoperitoneum. Prolongation of inspiratory time in a respiratory cycle has been found to improve oxygenation without any increase in peak airway pressure. Hence, we studied the effect of equal ratio volume-controlled ventilation on the mechanics of respiration and hemodynamics in comparison with conventional ratio volume-controlled ventilation. Materials and Methods: Seventy-six general surgical patients aged 18–70 years of age belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II posted for upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A patients were ventilated with volume-controlled 1:1 ventilation whereas Group B patients were ventilated with 1:2 ratio ventilation. Intraoperatively, parameters of respiratory mechanics that included peak airway pressure, mean airway pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and hemodynamics (MAP and heart rate) were recorded. The parameters measured were compared between the two groups using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: There were no significant differences in peak airway and MAPs recorded between the two groups (P = 0.82 and P = 0.51, respectively). The hemodynamic parameters, saturation, and end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements also remained similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Volume-controlled equal ratio ventilation was found to be similar to conventional ratio ventilation in terms of parameters of respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries.
format Article
id doaj-art-8305c390e6c24b1c99661ae402ef6e29
institution Kabale University
issn 2542-6273
2455-3069
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
spelling doaj-art-8305c390e6c24b1c99661ae402ef6e292025-01-23T05:24:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine2542-62732455-30692024-01-01101313710.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_131_23Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trialPrathap GunasekaranRamyavel ThangaveluSivakumar SegaranBackground: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries are often at risk of developing hypoxemia, increased airway pressure, and barotrauma due to pneumoperitoneum. Prolongation of inspiratory time in a respiratory cycle has been found to improve oxygenation without any increase in peak airway pressure. Hence, we studied the effect of equal ratio volume-controlled ventilation on the mechanics of respiration and hemodynamics in comparison with conventional ratio volume-controlled ventilation. Materials and Methods: Seventy-six general surgical patients aged 18–70 years of age belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II posted for upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A patients were ventilated with volume-controlled 1:1 ventilation whereas Group B patients were ventilated with 1:2 ratio ventilation. Intraoperatively, parameters of respiratory mechanics that included peak airway pressure, mean airway pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and hemodynamics (MAP and heart rate) were recorded. The parameters measured were compared between the two groups using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: There were no significant differences in peak airway and MAPs recorded between the two groups (P = 0.82 and P = 0.51, respectively). The hemodynamic parameters, saturation, and end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements also remained similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Volume-controlled equal ratio ventilation was found to be similar to conventional ratio ventilation in terms of parameters of respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_131_23equal ratio ventilationlaparoscopic surgeriespneumoperitoneumrespiratory mechanics
spellingShingle Prathap Gunasekaran
Ramyavel Thangavelu
Sivakumar Segaran
Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trial
Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine
equal ratio ventilation
laparoscopic surgeries
pneumoperitoneum
respiratory mechanics
title Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of effects of volume-controlled equal inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio (1:1) ventilation with conventional ratio (1:2) ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of effects of volume controlled equal inspiratory to expiratory ratio 1 1 ventilation with conventional ratio 1 2 ventilation on respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics in patients undergoing upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries a randomized clinical trial
topic equal ratio ventilation
laparoscopic surgeries
pneumoperitoneum
respiratory mechanics
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_131_23
work_keys_str_mv AT prathapgunasekaran comparisonofeffectsofvolumecontrolledequalinspiratorytoexpiratoryratio11ventilationwithconventionalratio12ventilationonrespiratorymechanicsandhemodynamicsinpatientsundergoingupperabdominallaparoscopicsurgeriesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ramyavelthangavelu comparisonofeffectsofvolumecontrolledequalinspiratorytoexpiratoryratio11ventilationwithconventionalratio12ventilationonrespiratorymechanicsandhemodynamicsinpatientsundergoingupperabdominallaparoscopicsurgeriesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sivakumarsegaran comparisonofeffectsofvolumecontrolledequalinspiratorytoexpiratoryratio11ventilationwithconventionalratio12ventilationonrespiratorymechanicsandhemodynamicsinpatientsundergoingupperabdominallaparoscopicsurgeriesarandomizedclinicaltrial